Innovation Ecosystems in the Automotive Industry between Opportunities and Limitations

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The creation of effective innovation ecosystems (IES) at the national or sectoral level remains a difficult and not always feasible task. Basing on evidence from the Brazilian automotive industry, a case of unused opportunities for building a strong IES is considered. This is due to the insensitivity of such ecosystems to new complicated configurations and the formats of non-traditional interaction that they suggest - a “new ecology of competition”, etc. The internal context of companies in relation to the practice of open innovation has been studied. Despite joint projects with close value chain partners, carmakers are showing a closed attitude to external collaboration, unlike players in industries such as aerospace or information and communications technology that gained growth and major transformation by building a broader IES. Only a high demand from the government for creating a strong IES can change the situation.

Авторлар туралы

Rikardo daSil'va

Polytechnique Montreal

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ricardohsilva@usp.br
Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada; University of São Paulo, Butanta, São Paulo - State of São Paulo, Brazil

Paulo Kaminski

University of São Paulo

Email: pckamins@usp.br
Butanta, São Paulo - State of São Paulo, Brazil

Rafael Marin

Gradus Management Consulting

Email: rafaelortegamarin@gmail.com
São Paulo, Brazil

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Adner R. (2006) Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, April. https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem, дата обращения 18.02.2021.
  2. Adner R., Kapoor R. (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (3), 306-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
  3. Aquilani B., Abbate T., Codini A. (2017) Overcoming cultural barriers in open innovation processes through intermediaries: A theoretical framework. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 15(3), 447-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0067-5
  4. Armellini F., Kaminski P.C., Beaudry C. (2011) Consortium for research and innovation in aerospace in Quebec, Canada a reference model for the Brazilian aerospace industry. Product Management & Development, 9(2), 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/pmd.2012.002
  5. Autio E., Thomas L.D.W. (2014) Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management. In: Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management (eds. M. Dodgson, D.M. Gann, N. Phillips), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.012
  6. Balland P.A., Boschma R., Frenken K. (2015) Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
  7. Banister D. (2007) Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 7-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1271
  8. Baptista R., Swann P. (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
  9. Bathelty H., Cohendet P. (2014) The creation of knowledge: Local building, global accessing and economic development-toward an agenda. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(5), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu027
  10. Beadry C., Swann P. (2001) Growth in Industrial Clusters: A Bird's Eye View of the United Kingdom, Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  11. Beaudry C. (2001) Entry, growth and patenting in industrial clusters: A study of the aerospace industry in the UK. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3), 405-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510110079000
  12. Beaudry C., Breschi S. (2003) Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4), 325-342,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590290020197
  13. Beirao G., Sarsfield Cabral J.A. (2007) Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009
  14. Bell G.G. (2005) Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.448
  15. Bellini F., Dulskaia I., Savastano M., D'Ascenzo F. (2019) Business Models Innovation for Sustainable Urban Mobility in Small and Medium-Sized European Cities. Management and Marketing, 14(3), 266-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0019
  16. Benitez G.B., Ayala N.F., Frank A.G. (2020) Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107735
  17. Bianchi M., Cavaliere A., Chiaroni D., Frattini F., Chiesa V. (2011) Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002
  18. Bigliardi B., Dormio A.I., Galati F. (2012) The adoption of open innovation within the telecommunication industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 27-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211192825
  19. Breunig K.J., Aas T.H., Hydle K.M. (2014) Incentives and performance measures for open innovation practices. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(1), 45-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-10-2013-0049
  20. Broekel T., Boschma R. (2012) Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr010
  21. Burns L.D. (2013) A vision of our transport future. Nature, 497, 181-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/497181a
  22. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. (2009) ‘Mode 3' and ‘Quadruple Helix': Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374
  23. Chesbrough H.W. (2003) Open Innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
  24. Chesbrough H.W., Appleyard M.M. (2007) Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F41166416.
  25. Chong Z.J., Qin B., Bandyopadhyay T., Wongpiromsarn T., Rankin E.S., Ang M.H., Frazzoli E., Rus D., Hsu D., Low K.H. (2011) Autonomous personal vehicle for the first- and last-mile transportation services. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) 17-19 September 2011, Qingdao, China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS.2011.6070337
  26. Cooper R.G. (2015) What's Next?: After Stage-Gate. Research-Technology Management, 57(1), 20-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5606963
  27. Da Silva R.H., Kaminski P.C., Marin R.O. (2021) Innovation Ecosystems in the Automotive Industry between Opportunities and Limitations. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(3), 66-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.3.66.80
  28. Dahl M.S., Pedersen C.O.R. (2004) Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: Myth or reality? Research Policy, 33(10), 1673-1689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.004
  29. Dahlander L., Gann D.M. (2010) How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
  30. Delgado M., Porter M.E., Stern S. (2016) Defining clusters of related industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(1), 1-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv017
  31. Forza C. (2002) Survey research in operations management: A process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(2), 152-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414310
  32. Fransman M. (2010) The new ICT ecosystem: Implications for policy and regulation, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  33. Gassmann O., Enkel E. (2004) Towards a theory of Open Innovation: Three core process archetypes. 2004, Paper presented at the R&D Management Conference, January 2004. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/36384702_Towards_a_Theory_of_Open_Innovation_Three_Core_Process_Archetypes, дата обращения 20.07.2021.
  34. Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2014) Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
  35. Gomes L.A., Facin A.L.F., Salerno M.S., Ikenami R.K. (2018) Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(11), 30-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
  36. Graham-Rowe E., Skippon S., Gardner B., Abraham C. (2011) Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(5), 401-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.02.001
  37. Henn S., Bathelt H. (2015) Knowledge generation and field reproduction in temporary clusters and the role of business conferences. Geoforum, 58, 104-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.015
  38. Hering S., Redlich T., Wulfsberg J.P., Bruhns F.-L. (2011) Open innovation in the automotive industry. ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 106(9), 647-652.
  39. Ho C.Q., Hensher D.A., Mulley C., Wong Y.Z. (2018) Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for Mobility as a Service (MaaS): A stated choice study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 302-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.025
  40. Humphrey J., Schmitz H. (2002) How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000022198
  41. Iammarino S., McCann P. (2006) The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35(7), 1018-1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004
  42. Iansiti M., Levien R. (2002) The New Operational Dynamics of Business Ecosystems: Implications for Policy, Operations and Technology Strategy (Harvard Business School Working Paper 03-030), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1166-06.2006
  43. Iansiti M., Levien R. (2004) Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, March. https://hbr.org/2004/03/strategy-as-ecology, дата обращения 18.02.2021.
  44. Ili S., Albers A., Miller S. (2010) Open innovation in the automotive industry. R&D Management, 40(3), 246-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00595.x
  45. Jittrapirom P., Caiati V., Feneri A.M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi S., Alonso-Gonzalez M.J., Narayan J. (2017) Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2), 13-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931
  46. Kapoor R., Lee J.M. (2013) Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 274-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2010
  47. Karim D.M. (2017) Creating an Innovative Mobility Ecosystem for Urban Planning Areas. In: Disrupting Mobility (eds. G. Meyer, S. Shaheen), Hedelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, pp. 21-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8_2
  48. Koen P.A., Bertels H.M.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2014) Managing the front end of innovation-part II: Results from a three-year study. Research Technology Management, May-June, 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5703199
  49. Lewin A.Y., Valikangas L., Chen J. (2017) Enabling Open Innovation: Lessons from Haier. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 5-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1440.101002
  50. Lines T., Monypenny R. (2006) Industrial Clustering: A Literature Review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238712690_Industrial_Clustering, дата обращения 10.07.2021.
  51. Lyons G. (2018) Getting smart about urban mobility - Aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 4-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.001
  52. Ma Y., Rong K., Mangalagiu D., Thornton T.F., Zhu D. (2018) Co-evolution between urban sustainability and business ecosystem innovation: Evidence from the sharing mobility sector in Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 942-953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.323
  53. Marin R., Kaminski P.C., Armellini F., Bouchardy A. (2018) Open Innovation practices in the automotive industry?: an exploratory comparison between Brazil and France (SAE Technical Paper 2018-36-0210). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-36-0210
  54. Monteiro F., Mol M., Birkinshaw J. (2017) Ready to be Open? Explaining the Firm Level Barriers to Benefiting From Openness to External Knowledge. Long Range Planning, 50(2), 282-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.008
  55. Moore J.F. (1993) Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, May-June. https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition, дата обращения 18.02.2021.
  56. Mortara L., Minshall T. (2011) How do large multinational companies implement open innovation? Technovation, 31(10-11), 586-597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.002
  57. Ning Z., Xia F., Ullah N., Kong X., Hu X. (2017) Vehicular social networks: Enabling smart mobility. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(5), 16-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600263
  58. Oberg C., Alexander A.T. (2019) The openness of open innovation in ecosystems - Integrating innovation and management literature on knowledge linkages. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(4), 211-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.10.005
  59. Parmentier G., Mangematin V. (2014) Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 40-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.007
  60. Poudenx P. (2008) The effect of transportation policies on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission from urban passenger transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6), 901-909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.013
  61. Prettenthaler F.E., Steininger K.W. (1999) From ownership to service use lifestyle: The potential of car sharing. Ecological Economics, 28(3), 443-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00109-8
  62. Pulkkinen J., Jussila J., Partanen A., Trotskii I., Laiho A. (2019) Smart Mobility: Services, Platforms and Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9), 15-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1265
  63. Rabelo R.J., Bernus P. (2015) A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 48(3), 2250-2257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.423
  64. Rajashekara K. (2013) Present status and future trends in electric vehicle propulsion technologies. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 1(1), 3-10.
  65. Rohrbeck R., Holzle K., Gemunden H.G. (2009) Opening up for competitive advantage - How Deutsche telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.x
  66. Santos F.M., Eisenhardt K.M. (2005) Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0152
  67. Sarkar S., Costa A.I.A. (2008) Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19(11), 574-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.006
  68. Sieg J.H., Wallin M.W., and von Krogh G. (2010) Managerial challenges in open innovation: A study of innovation intermediation in the chemical industry. R&D Management, 40(3), 281-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00596.x
  69. Smith G., Sochor J., Karlsson I.C.M.A. (2018) Mobility as a Service: Development scenarios and implications for public transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 592-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.04.001
  70. Sturgeon T.J., van Biesebroeck J. (2011) Global value chains in the automotive industry: An enhanced role for developing countries? International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 4(1-3), 181-205.
  71. Swann P., Prevezer M. (1996) A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research Policy, 25(7), 1139-1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00897-9
  72. Teece D.J. (2018) Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
  73. Thompson V., Hardash J.A.C., Decker B., Summers R.O. (2012) NASA (In)novation ecosystem: Taking technology innovation from buzz to reality. Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 3-10 March 2012, Big Sky, MT, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2012.6187447
  74. Torre A. (2008) On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmission. Regional Studies, 42(6), 869-889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801922814
  75. Torre A., Zimmermann J.-B. (2015) From clusters to local industrial ecosystems. Revue d'economie industrielle, 52, 13-38,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.6204
  76. Traitler H., Watzke H.J., Saguy I.S. (2011) Reinventing R&D in an Open Innovation Ecosystem. Journal of Food Science, 76(2), R62-68,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01998.x
  77. Walsh J.P., Lee Y.N., Nagaoka S. (2016) Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation. Research Policy, 45(8), 1660-1671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.013
  78. West J., Bogers M. (2014) Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125
  79. West J., Salter A., Vanhaverbeke W., Chesbrough H. (2014) Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805-811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001
  80. Wilhelm M., Dolfsma W. (2018) Managing knowledge boundaries for open innovation - Lessons from the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 230-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0337
  81. Wright M.,Train K. (1987) Qualitative Choice Analysis-Theory, Econometrics and an Application to Automobile Demand. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(7), 665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2582403
  82. Wu G., Inderbitzin A., Bening C. (2015) Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles: A probabilistic analysis and projection across market segments. Energy Policy, 80, 196-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.004
  83. Yang C.H., Motohashi K., Chen J.R. (2009) Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38(1), 77-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.001

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».