Email this article Sex identification of Humboldt penguins using a morphometric analysis
- Authors: Sabutskaya M.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Primorsky Aquarium – Branch of A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology of Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Far Eastern Federal University
- Issue: Vol 11, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 110-114
- Section: Biological Sciences
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2309-4370/article/view/133226
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55355/snv2022114116
- ID: 133226
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Primorsky Aquarium keeps a population of 32 Humboldt penguins. The employees of Ornithology Department are faced with a problem of sex identification of 18 immature/young penguins. Male and female Humboldt penguins have not significant differences in feather coloration, so reliable sex identification by direct observation is not possible. The most reliable ultrasound and genetic methods require special equipment, reagents and qualified specialists as well as provoke stress that is dangerous for the health of the birds. Sex identification by morphometric parameters for captivity birds is more preferable, since this procedure is non-invasive, does not require special equipment and specialists. We have performed a statistical analysis of measurements of the beak length in 3 variations, of the dorsal part of flipper length, and weight of females and males of the studied group. For the first time, we have added to the analysis the length of the beak from the nostril, which was not previously taken into account. It has been found that the use of 4 traits simultaneously in the analysis does not demonstrate a significant correlation with the sex of the bird, and therefore is not suitable for the sex identification of penguins. The most consistent features for correlation analysis were the beak length and the flipper length. The maximum grouping of birds by sex within the study group was observed while comparing these morphometric characteristics.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Miroslava Alekseevna Sabutskaya
Primorsky Aquarium – Branch of A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology of Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Far Eastern Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: sabutskaya89@mail.ru
leading specialist of Ornithology Department, master student of Institute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine
Russian Federation, Vladivostok; VladivostokReferences
- Wallace R.S., Dubach J., Michaels M.G., Keuler N.S., Diebold E.D., Grzybowski K., Teare J.A., Willis M.J. Morphometric determination of gender in adult Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) // Waterbirds. 2008. Vol. 31, iss. 3. P. 448–453. doi: 10.1675/1524-4695-31.3.448.
- Merritt K., King Nancy E. Behavioral sex differences and activity patterns of captive Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) // Zoo Biology. 1987. Vol. 6, iss. 2. P. 129–138.
- Scholten C.J. Breeding biology of the Humboldt penguin Spheniscus humboldti at Emmen Zoo // International Zoo Yearbook. 1987. Vol. 26, iss. 1. P. 198–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.1987.tb03158.x.
- Romanov M.N., Betuel A.M., Chemnick L.G., Ryder O.A., Kulibaba R.O., Tereshchenko O.V., Payne W.S., Delekta Ph.C., Dodgson J.B., Tuttle E.M., Gonser R.A. Widely applicable PCR-markers for sex identification in birds // Russian Journal of Genetics. 2019. Vol. 55, iss. 2. P. 220–231. doi: 10.1134/s1022795419020121.
- Dubach J. Gender determination in captive and wild species of penguin // Penguin Conservation. 1996. Vol. 9. P. 14–16.
- Hull C.L. Morphometric indices for sexing adult Royal Eudyptes schlegeli and Rockhopper E. chrysocome penguins at Macquarie Island // Marine Ornithology. 1996. Vol. 24. P. 23–27.
- Renner M., Davis L.S. Sexing little penguins Eudyptula minor from Cook Strait, New Zealand using discriminant function analysis // Emu – Austral Ornithology. 1999. Vol. 99, iss. 1. P. 74–79. doi: 10.1071/mu99009c.
- Scolaro J.A. Sexing fledglings and yearlings of Magellanic penguins by discriminant analysis of morphometric measurements // Colonial Waterbirds. 1987. Vol. 10, iss. 1. P. 50–54. doi: 10.2307/1521230.
- Zavalaga C.B., Paredes R. Sex determination of adult Humboldt penguins using morphometric characters // Journal of Field Ornithology. 1997. Vol. 68, iss. 1. P. 102–112.
- Bertellotti M., Tella J.L., Godoy J.A., Blanco G., Forero M.G., Donazar J.A., Ceballos O. Determining sex of Magellanic penguins using molecular procedures and discriminant functions // Waterbirds. 2002. Vol. 25, iss. 4. P. 479–484. doi: 10.1675/1524-4695(2002)025[0479:dsompu]2.0.co;2.
- Boersma P.D., Davies E.M. Sexing monomorphic birds by vent measurements // Auk. 1987. Vol. 104. P. 779–783.
- Scolaro J.A., Hall M.A., Ximenez I.M. The Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus): sexing adults by discriminant analysis of morphometric characters // Auk. 1983. Vol. 100. P. 221–224.
- Gales R.P. Sexing adult Blue penguins by external measurements // Notornis. 1988. № 35. P. 71–75.
- Pennington V. The use of radioimmunoassays to determine gender in Humboldt penguins Spheniscus humboldti // Penguin Conservation. 1996. Vol. 9. P. 16–18.
- Samour H.J., Stevenson M., Knight J.A., Lawrie A.J. Sexing penguins by cloacal examination // Veterinary Record. 1983. Vol. 113, iss. 4. P. 84–85. doi: 10.1136/vr.113.4.84.
- McDonald S. Surgical sexing of birds by laparoscopy // California Veterinarian. 1982. Vol. 5. P. 16–22.
- Hildebrandt T., Pitra C., Sommer P., Pinkowski M. Sex identification in birds of prey by ultrasonography // Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 1995. Vol. 26, № 3. P. 367–376.
- Griffiths R., Double M.C., Orr K., Dawson R.J.Q. A DNA test to sex most birds // Molecular Ecology. 1998. Vol. 7. P. 1071–1075.
- Purwaningrum M., Nugroho A., Asvan M., Karyanti K., Alviyanto B., Kusuma R., Haryanto A. Molecular techniques for sex identification of captive birds // Veterinary World № 12 (9). P. 1506–1513. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1506-1513.
- Forero M.G., Tella J.L., Donazar J.A., Blanco G., Bertellotti M., Ceballos O. Phenotypic assortative mating and within-pair sexual dimorphism and its influence on breeding success and offspring quality in Magellanic penguins // Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2001. Vol. 79, iss. 8. P. 1414–1422. doi: 10.1139/z01-088.
- Agnew D.J., Kerry K.R. Sexual dimorphism in penguins // The penguins / eds P.N.I. Normar, P. Reilly. Surrey: Beatty and Sons, 1995. P. 299–318.
- Alvin N.S., Darby J.T., Lambert D.M. The use of morphometric measurements to sex Yellow-eyed penguins // Waterbirds. 2004. Vol. 27, iss. 1. P. 96–101.
Supplementary files
