Information Warfare in a Multipolar World
- Authors: Bazavluk S.V.1, Kovalev A.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Institute for the Development of Communications
- Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Issue: Vol 25, No 2 (2025): The Difficult Path from Bipolarity to a Multipolar World Order: To the 80th Anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War
- Pages: 236-250
- Section: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-0660/article/view/320639
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-2-236-250
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MQQFIS
- ID: 320639
Cite item
Abstract
The formation of a new world order in the 21st century is in its infancy, and the growing contradiction between international actors continues to intensify. In an effort to preserve unipolarity and counteract multipolarity, the United States adheres to the concept of information warfare, involving the rest of the world in this process. Conflict remains a prevalent feature of international relations, and dialogue is frequently perceived either as a sign of weakness or as a planned maneuver by an opponent. The purpose of the study is to identify the features of the axiological and technical aspects of information warfare in a multipolar world. Two key aspects of information warfare are examined separately: the information-psychological and the information-technical. The analysis of the use of information warfare tools enables the identification of the direction of actions by global actors, the main methods employed, the goals pursued and the results achieved. The research methodology is based on systematic and axiological approaches, which have facilitated the conceptualization of information warfare as a form of non-kinetic influence on the value and institutional foundations of the enemy. The present study employs a hermeneutical analysis of sources, incorporating elements of lexico-semantic analysis, as a methodological approach. The main conclusion of the study asserts that information warfare, in which the United States remains the main actor, poses a serious threat to the emerging multipolar world and the security of its supporters, while acknowledging their potential for resistance, which is likely to emerge in the future. In conclusion, the following directions for further research are proposed: firstly, the practice of interaction between the allied states that prevent the restoration of a unipolar world; secondly, the information pressure from the United States and the collective West; thirdly, Russia’s transition from defensive to offensive actions in the information warfare; and fourthly, the analysis of new tools and methods of conducting information warfare, as well as other relevant topics.
About the authors
Sergei V. Bazavluk
National Research Institute for the Development of Communications
Email: bazavluk@nicrus.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9739-2594
SPIN-code: 3560-9701
PhD (Political Science), Head, International Scientific Exchange Programs
Moscow, Russian FederationAndrei A. Kovalev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Author for correspondence.
Email: kovalev-aa@ranepa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7760-5732
SPIN-code: 1380-8790
PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor, Department of Public and Municipal Administration, North-West Institute of Management - Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
St. Petersburg, Russian FederationReferences
- Azad, T. M., Haider, M. W., & Sadiq, M. (2023). Understanding gray zone warfare from multiple perspectives. World Affairs, 186(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221141101; EDN: YPIWZD
- Bartosh, A. A. (2024). Global hybrid warfare. Moscow: Goryachaya liniya-Telekom publ. (In Russian).
- Bazarkina, D. Yu., & Pashentsev, E. N. (2019). Artificial intelligence and new threats to international psychological security. Russia in Global Affairs, 17(1), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-1-147-170; EDN: FYAQFW
- Bazarkina, D. Yu., & Pashentsev, E. N. (2020). Malicious use of artificial intelligence. Russia in Global Affairs, 18(4), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-4-154-177; EDN: ZZANTF
- Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Moscow: GU VShE publ. (In Russian).
- Clarke, R., & Knake, R. (2010). Cyber war: The next threat to national security and what to do about it. New York: Ecco.
- Danilin, I. V. (2020). The U.S. - China technology war: Risks and opportunities for P.R.C. and global tech sector. Comparative Politics Russia, 11(4), 160-176. EDN: GYRYVR
- Danilova, E. A., & Zabolotnaya, E. D. (2023). Political PR technologies in the information warfare between Russia and the West amid the military-political conflict in Ukraine: New challenges and opportunities for Russia. Vlast', 31(2), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i2.9528; EDN: XYKPLA
- Goldstein, J., Sastry, G., Musser, M., DiResta, R., Gentzel, M., & Sedova, K. (2023). Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04246
- Goncharova, I. V., Nicevich, V. F., & Sudorgin, O. A. (2024). Information warfare as a tool of political confrontation in the modern multipolar world. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 11(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2024-11-1-19-31; EDN: ZIXNDI
- Hoyle, A., van den Berg, H., Doosje, B., & Kitzen, M. (2021). Grey matters: Advancing a psychological effects-based approach to countering malign information influence. New Perspectives, 29(2), 144-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X21995702; EDN: VKURAA
- Ilnitsky, A. M. (2021). Mental warfare in Russia. Voennaya Mysl’, (8), 19-33. (In Russian). EDN: TDSKIX
- Kefeli, I. F., & Komleva, N. A. (2019). On the role of information and ideological security in the counter-strategy hybrid war in Eurasia. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, (1), 54-60. (In Russian). EDN: NAHPIC
- Leksyutina, Ya. V. (2020). U.S. - China relations in 2018-2019: Trade war and the process of decoupling. World Economy and International Relations, 64(6), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-6-85-93; EDN: QRYEBK
- Li, Q., Liu, Q., Liu, S., Di, X., Chen, S., & Zhang, H. (2023). Influence of social bots in information warfare: A case study on @UAWeapons Twitter account in the context of the Russia - Ukraine conflict. Communication and the Public, 8(2), 54-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231166157; EDN: BWKLRB
- Linebarger, P. (1962). Psychological warfare. Moscow: Voenizdat publ. (In Russian).
- Manoylo, A. V. (2019). Fake news as a threat to national security and as a tool of information management. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 12: Politicheskie Nauki, (2), 37-45. (In Russian). EDN: HGEVPF
- Manoylo, A. V. (2021). Evolution of information operations. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University, (4), 80-103. https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2021-4-1100; EDN: MVAJGI
- Minor, D. (1970). Information war. Boston: Hawthorne Books Publishing House.
- Ördén, H. (2024). The neuropolitical imaginaries of cognitive warfare. Security Dialogue, 55(6), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241253527; EDN: HIWMNY
- Pantserev, K. A. (2020). The malicious use of AI-based deepfake technology as the new threat to psychological security and political stability. In H. Jahankhani, S. Kendzierskyj, N. Chelvachandran, J. Ibarra (Eds.), Cyber defence in the age of AI, smart societies and augmented humanity (pp. 37-55). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35746-7_3; EDN: IQCSJW
- Pashentsev, E. N. (2019). Malicious use of artificial intelligence: New threats to international psychological security and ways to neutralize them. E-Journal Public Administration, (76), 279-300. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2070-1381-2019-10013; EDN: CVLXTW
- Pozdnyakov, A. I., & Shevtsov, V. S. (2017). Methodological basis of creation of the theory of information antagonism. Sotsial’no-Gumanitarnye Znaniya, (2), 244-257. (In Russian). EDN: YJYGXD
- Proroković, D. (2021). A Western attempt to portray Russia as an enemy (about the concept of Russian malign in uence). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 12: Politicheskie Nauki, (2), 72-85. (In Russian). EDN: LPTWIL
- Ramich, M. S., & Piskunov, D. A. (2022). The securitization of cyberspace: From rulemaking to establishing legal regimes. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-238-255; EDN: KSSXFK
- Tatunts, S. A. (2024). Formation of a multipolar world order under the conditions of a global information confrontation. Information Society, (3), 2-9. (In Russian). EDN: TRSYZC
- Vasilenko, I. A. (2014). Formation of the new image of Russia “after Crimea”: Paradoxes of information war. Vlast’, (10), 204-208. (In Russian). EDN: SXSXCZ
- Ventsel, A., Hansson, S., Madisson, M.-L., & Sazonov, V. (2019). Discourse of fear in strategic narratives: The case of Russia’s Zapad war games. Media, War & Conflict, 14(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219856552
- Vinogradov, A. O., Salitsky, A. I., & Semenova, N. K. (2019). U.S. - China economic confrontation: Ideology, chronology, meaning. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(1), 35-46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-35-46; EDN: ZBFCZN
- Vykhodets, R. S. (2022). Large AI spaces and Russia’s strategy in the context of the “sanctions war”. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-256-270; EDN: FYNYWU
- Vykhodets, R. S., & Pantserev, K. A. (2022). Comparative analysis of modern concepts of information warfare. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 16(4), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-04-139-148; EDN: SVTUJU
Supplementary files
