Relationship of Cooperative or Competitive University Climate with the Positive Creativity in Russian Students

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Creativity is one of the key competences that educational organizations should foster in their students. Considering the valence of creative ideas and their consequences, this study examines the relationship between cooperation and competition as aspects of university climate with students’ positive creativity. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 341 Russian students (54.8% - females) using PISA’s measurement of cooperation and competition and the task from “Test of realistic problem situations,” adapted to measure positive creativity in a university context. The results showed that there is no significant relationship between cooperative climate and positive creativity, whereas a competitive climate contributes to students’ positive creativity. The discussion explores consequences of the cooperative and competitive climates in a broader perspective as well as the specific characteristics of everyday positive creativity in a social domain. Overall, the study suggests that competitive climate can lead to more pronounced positive social creativity, probably as a defensive strategy.

About the authors

Sonia A. Berrios Callejas

HSE University

Email: soniaberrios@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9572-2289

PhD student

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Kodja

HSE University

Email: katerina.kodja@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-3275
SPIN-code: 7315-3399

PhD in Psychology, Invited Lecturer

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Maria A. Bultseva

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: mbultseva@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5899-9916
SPIN-code: 5293-2730

PhD in Psychology, Senior Research Fellow, Centre of Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-%23
  2. Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.002
  3. Baer, J., & McKool, S.S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In C.S. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65–77). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004
  4. Baer, M., Leenders, R. Th.A.J., Oldham, G.R., & Vadera, A.K. (2010). Win or lose the battle for creativity: The power and perils of intergroup competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 827–845. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.52814611
  5. Baldwin, R.G. (2009). The climate for undergraduate teaching and learning in STEM fields. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2009(117), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.340
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  7. Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181
  8. Beghetto, R.A., & Anderson, R.C. (2022). Positive creativity is principled creativity. Education Sciences, 12(3), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030184
  9. Benedek, M., Karstendiek, M., Ceh, S.M., Grabner, R.H., Krammer, G., Lebuda, I., Silvia, P.J., Cotter, K.N., Li, Y., Hu, W., Martskvishvili, K., & Kaufman, J.C. (2021). Creativity myths: Prevalence and correlates of misconceptions on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, 111068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111068
  10. Białkiewicz, A. (2020). Architectural competitions support student creativity. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(2), 157–162.
  11. Bittner, J.V., & Heidemeier, H. (2013). Competitive mindsets, creativity, and the role of regulatory focus. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.03.003
  12. Bradler, C., Neckermann, S., & Warnke, A.J. (2016). Incentivizing creativity: A large-scale experiment with tournaments and gifts. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 16-035/VII. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2772526
  13. Brohmer, H., Fauler, A., Floto, C., Athenstaedt, U., Kedia, G., Eckerstorfer, L.V., & Corcoran, K. (2019). Inspired to lend a hand? Attempts to elicit prosocial behavior through goal contagion. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 545. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00545
  14. Brown, S.P., Cron, W.L., & Slocum, J.W. (1998). Effects of trait competitiveness and perceived intraorganizational competition on salesperson goal setting and performance. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200407
  15. Burkšaitienė, N. (2018). How can university learning environment contribute to students’ creativity? Lithuanian students’ perspective. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.271
  16. Cai, H.B., Liu, Q., & Xiao, G. (2005). Does competition encourage unethical behavior? The case of corporate profit hiding in China. SSRN. Retrieved January 12, 2025, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=676183
  17. Capraro, V., Smyth, C., Mylona, K., & Niblo, G. A. (2014). Benevolent characteristics promote cooperative behaviour among humans. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102881
  18. Carmeli, A., Dutton, J.E., & Hardin, A.E. (2015). Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Human Relations, 68(6), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714550256
  19. Carnevale, P.J., & Probst, T.M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300–1309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1300
  20. Catarino, P., Vasco, P., Lopes, J., Silva, H., & Morais, E. (2019). Cooperative learning on promoting creative thinking and mathematical creativity in higher education. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.3.001
  21. Choi, J., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. (2011). Relationships among cooperative learning experiences, social interdependence, children’s aggression, victimization, and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(4), 976–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00744.x
  22. Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J.J., & Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007
  23. Clydesdale, G. (2006). Creativity and competition: The Beatles. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1802_1
  24. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  25. David, E.M., Kim, T.-Y., Rodgers, M., & Chen, T. (2021). Helping while competing? The complex effects of competitive climates on the prosocial identity and performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 58(6), 1507–1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12675
  26. De Dreu, C.K.W. (2010). Social conflict: The emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed., pp. 983–1023). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002027
  27. Dollinger, S.J., Burke, P.A., & Gump, N.W. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701395028
  28. Duffy, J., & Kornienko, T. (2010). Does competition affect giving? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1–2), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.001
  29. Erat, S., & Gneezy, U. (2016). Incentives for creativity. Experimental Economics, 19(2), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9440-5
  30. Fehr, E., & Krajbich, I. (2014). Social preferences and the brain. In P.W. Glimcher, & E. Fehr (Eds.). Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (2nd ed., pp. 193–218). London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00011-5
  31. Fetiskin, N.P., Kozlov, V.V., & Manuilov, G.M. (2002). Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality and small group development. Moscow: Psikhoterapiya Publ. (In Russ.)
  32. Förster, J., & Higgins, E.T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16(8), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
  33. Fung, D., & Howe, C. (2012). Liberal studies in Hong Kong: A new perspective on critical thinking through group work. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.002
  34. Gao, Q., Chen, P., Zhou, Z., & Jiang, J. (2020). The impact of school climate on trait creativity in primary school students: The mediating role of achievement motivation and proactive personality. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1707644
  35. Gao, Z., Cheng, L., Li, J., Chen, Q., & Hao, N. (2022). The dark side of creativity: Neural correlates of malevolent creative idea generation. Neuropsychologia, 167, 108164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108164
  36. Ge, J.-J., Zhang, P., & Dong, D. (2022). Can extrinsic motivational state hinder good behavior? The mediating role of ambition and competition in relationships of contingent rewards and punishments with work performance. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2162–2183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00688-2
  37. Gentile, D.A., Anderson, C.A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L.K., Shibuya, A., Liau, A.K., Khoo, A., Bushman, B.J., Huesmann, L.R., & Sakamoto, A. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045
  38. Grant, A.M., & Berry, J.W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
  39. Gross, D.P. (2020). Creativity under fire: The effects of competition on creative production. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00831
  40. Hegarty, W.H., & Sims, H.P. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.451
  41. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  42. Hurtado, S., Eagan, M.K., Tran, M.C., Newman, C.B., Chang, M.J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01714.x
  43. Hyde, M.S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2000). Factors that increase persistence of female undergraduate science students. In J. Bart (Ed.). Women succeeding in the sciences: Theories and practices across disciplines (pp. 115­137). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
  44. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  45. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09339057
  46. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Johnson, J., & Anderson, D. (1976). Effects of cooperative versus individualized instruction on student prosocial behavior, attitudes toward learning, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.4.446
  47. Kahveci, A., Southerland, S.A., & Gilmer, P.J. (2008). From marginality to legitimate peripherality: Understanding the essential functions of a women’s program. Science Education, 92(1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20234
  48. Kapoor, H., & Khan, A. (2017). Deceptively yours: Valence-based creativity and deception. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.12.006
  49. Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
  50. Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
  51. Koran, C.M. (1989). School climate and student affective needs: A descriptive study of four junior high schools. M.Ed. Thesis. Lethbridge, AB: University of Lethbridge.
  52. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology (F. Heider & G. M. Heider, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill. http://doi.org/10.1037/10019-000
  53. Lee, T., Sam Liu, C.-H., & Li, P.-H. (2021). The influences of cooperative climate, competitive climate and customer empowerment on service creativity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102726
  54. Lin, S.-Y. (S.), Park, G., Zhou, Q., & Hirst, G. (2023). Two birds, one stone: How altruism can facilitate both individual creativity and prosocial behavior in two different team contexts. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 27(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000188
  55. Lombardi, E., Traficante, D., Bettoni, R., Offredi, I., Giorgetti, M., & Vernice, M. (2019). The impact of school climate on well-being experience and school engagement: A study with high-school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02482
  56. Lu, K., Xue, H., Nozawa, T., & Hao, N. (2019). Cooperation makes a group be more creative. Cerebral Cortex, 29(8), 3457–3470. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy215
  57. Luengo Kanacri, B.P., Eisenberg, N., Thartori, E., Pastorelli, C., Uribe Tirado, L.M., Gerbino, M., & Caprara, G.V. (2017). Longitudinal relations among positivity, perceived positive school climate, and prosocial behavior in colombian adolescents. Child Development, 88(4), 1100–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12863
  58. Manzano-Sánchez, D., Gómez-Mármol, A., Valero-Valenzuela, A., & Jiménez-Parra, J.F. (2021). School climate and responsibility as predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviors and violence: A study towards self-determination theory. Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11030036
  59. Maxwell, S., Reynolds, K.J., Lee, E., Subasic, E., & Bromhead, D. (2017). The impact of school climate and school identification on academic achievement: Multilevel modeling with student and teacher data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02069
  60. Mayseless, N., Saggar, M., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. (2018). Creativity in the twenty-first century: The added benefit of training and cooperation. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel & L. Leifer (Eds.). Design Thinking Research. Making Distinctions: Collaboration versus Cooperation (pp. 239–249). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_12
  61. Mcglynn, R.P., Gibbs, M.E., & Roberts, S.J. (1982). Effects of cooperative versus competitive set and coaction on creative responding. The Journal of Social Psychology, 118(2), 281–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9922809
  62. Meshkova, N.V., & Enikolopov, S.N. (2016). The directions of creativity research in social interaction. Voprosy Psychologii, (4), 118-128. (In Russ.)
  63. Moos, R.H., & Moos, B.S. (1978). Classroom social climate and student absences and grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.2.263
  64. Moyal, A., & Ritov, I. (2020). The effect of contest participation and contest outcome on subsequent prosocial behavior. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0240712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240712
  65. Murphy, R.O., & Ackermann, K.A. (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501745
  66. Naumov, A., & Puffer, S. (2000). Measuring Russian culture using Hofstede’s dimensions. Applied Psychology, 49(4), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00041
  67. Nijstad, B.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2012). Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.004
  68. OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en
  69. Ogrutan, P.L., Machidon, A.L., & Dinu, A. (2019). Is there a link between creativity and multiculturalism in education? TEM Journal, 8(2), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem82-34
  70. Pavlova, E.M. (2018). Model of connections between self-esteem of creativity and intelligence, tolerance of uncertainty and creativity. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 15(1), 69-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2018-1-69-78
  71. Pearsall, M.J., & Venkataramani, V. (2015). Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: The interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038315
  72. Posselt, J.R., & Lipson, S.K. (2016). Competition, anxiety, and depression in the college classroom: Variations by student identity and field of study. Journal of College Student Development, 57(8), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0094
  73. Prabhu, R., Miller, S.R., Simpson, T.W., & Meisel, N.A. (2020). Built to win? Exploring the role of competitive environments on students’ creativity in design for additive manufacturing tasks. Journal of Engineering Design, 31(11–12), 574–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2020.1851661
  74. Roseth, C.J., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
  75. Schei, V. (2013). Creative people create values: Creativity and positive arousal in negotiations. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843336
  76. Schwartz, S.H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P.R. Shaver (Eds.). Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-012
  77. Seymour, E. (2002). Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1044
  78. Shapiro, C.A., & Sax, L.J. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.404
  79. Sommet, N., Darnon, C., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., Pulfrey, C., Dompnier, B., & Butera, F. (2014). Performance goals in conflictual social interactions: Towards the distinction between two modes of relational conflict regulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12015
  80. Sternberg, R.J., & Chowkase, A. (2021). When we teach for positive creativity, what exactly do we teach for? Education Sciences, 11(5), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050237
  81. Sternberg, R.J., & Karami, S. (2021, April 8). Teaching for Positive Creativity. ASCD. Retrieved January 12, 2025, from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/teaching-for-positive-creativity
  82. Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807916.003
  83. Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907
  84. Vaccaro, A. (2010). What lies beneath seemingly positive campus climate results: Institutional sexism, racism, and male hostility toward equity initiatives and liberal bias. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(2), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903520231
  85. Wang, H.-H., & Deng, X. (2022). The bridging role of goals between affective traits and positive creativity. Education Sciences, 12(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020144
  86. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J.L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
  87. Waring, T.M., Sullivan, A.V., & Stapp, J.R. (2016). Campus prosociality as a sustainability indicator. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(6), 895–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2015-0091
  88. Wasburn, M.H., & Miller, S.G. (2004). Retaining undergraduate women in science, engineering, and technology: A survey of a student organization. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 6(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.2190/ndxh-ym83-tkwy-4e6c
  89. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02249397
  90. Yan, B. (2019). Social value orientation, social influence and crowdsourced creativity. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 13434. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.13434abstract
  91. Zhao, Z., Renard, D., Elmoukhliss, M., & Balague, C. (2016). What affects creative performance in idea co-creation: Competitive, cooperative or coopetitive climate? International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(04), 1640002. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919616400028
  92. Zhu, Y.-Q., Gardner, D.G., & Chen, H.-G. (2018). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2094–2115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638161

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».