Biopsychosocial Model of Psycholinguistic Mechanisms of Speech Communication Skills Development in Children

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The study is an attempt to build a biopsychosocial model (hereinafter - BPSM) of psycholinguistic mechanisms of speech development based on the synthesis of modern scientific data on the early stages of speech development obtained in natural and human sciences, including the authors’ research. In this model, the process of acquiring communicative-speech skills by a child is considered as the formation of an adaptive form of socially oriented behavior in the context of certain individual intents and real relationships with people, in which the child is the subject of these relationships. The formation of the functional speech and language system (FUSLAS) coincides with the acquisition of speech communication experience. During the first three years of life, a child’s FUSLAS changes and restructures not only quantitatively but also qualitatively. Thus, it is reasonable to distinguish between transitional versions of the FUSLASr in children and the final, mature version of the FUSLASr in adults. The unique thing about the FSNRF is that the communicative pragmatics block has a lot of weight. In children, this block is what helps them understand the communication situation, separate the adult’s speech (word choice), and connect it to the referent. This is needed for both communicating and teaching themselves correct speech. The study deals with the formation of FSNRR mechanisms including five blocks: the block of communicative pragmatics, the block of programming/decoding utterances, the semiotic block, the regulation block and the block of operational support. It is shown that the mechanisms of speech development are diverse, heterogeneous and change at different stages of child development. As is characteristic of any functional system, these mechanisms interact and mutually modulate each other. In the struggle for cognitive resources, components of speech activity compete with each other. This interaction takes place at three levels: psychophysiological, psycholinguistic and socio-psychological. The proposed BPSM seems promising for studying both norms and pathologies of speech development.

About the authors

Aleksandr N. Kornev

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: k1949@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6406-1238
Scopus Author ID: 56982662600
ResearcherId: B-6504- 2018

MD, D.Sc. in Psychology, Assoc. Prof., the Head of the Department of Logopathology, the Head of the Laboratory for Neurocognitive Technologies of the Center of Scientific Research

2 Litovskaya St, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194100

Ingrida Balčiūnienė

Vytautas Magnus University

Email: ingrimi@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8307-1108
Scopus Author ID: 25642358700
ResearcherId: L-9731-2013

PhD in Linguistics, Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Lithuanian Studies

58 Donelaičio St, Kaunas, The Republic of Lithuania, 44248

References

  1. Crane, W. (2007). Psychology of human development: 25 main theories. Saint Petersburg: Praim-EVROZNAK. (In Russ.).
  2. Vygotsky, L.S. (1995). Problem of development and decay of higher mental functions. In: Problems of defectology. (рр. 404–418). Mоscow: Prosveshchenie publ. (In Russ.).
  3. Bruner, D. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2(1), 1–19.
  4. Halliday, M.A. (1993). Towards a language-­based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.
  5. Tomasello, M. (2009). The usage-­based theory of language acquisition. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language. CUP, L. Bavin (Ed.) (рр. 69–87). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Kornev, A.N., & Balčiūnienė, I. (2021). Lexical and grammatical errors in developmentally language disordered and typically developed children: The impact of age and discourse genre. Children, 8(12), 1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121114 EDN: FNUEZC
  7. Zhinkin, N. (1998). Language — speech — creativity (selected works). Mоscow: Labirint. (In Russ.).
  8. Leontyev, A.A. (2008). Basics of psycholinguistics. Mоscow: Akademiya. (In Russ.).
  9. Zimnyaya, I.A. (2001). Linguopsychology of speech activity. Mоscow: Moscow Psychological and Social University. (In Russ.).
  10. Zalevskaya, A.A. (1999). Introduction to psycholinguistics. Moscow: Russian State University of Humanities. (In Russ.).
  11. Bernstein, N.A. (1990). Physiology, movement and activity. Mоscow: Nauka publ. (In Russ.).
  12. Ushakova, T.N. (2011). The birth of the word. Problems of speech psychology and psycholinguistics. Mоscow: Institute of Psychology RAN. (In Russ.).
  13. Levelt, W.J. (1993). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. MacWhinney, B. (1987). The Competition Model. In: Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (рр. 249–308). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  15. Leontyev, A.N. (1983). Selected psychological works. Mоscow: Pedagogikа publ.. (In Russ.).
  16. Bruner, J. (1999). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge.
  17. Meltzoff, A., & Gopnik, A. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind. In: Understanding other Minds, S. Baron-­Cohen, H. Tager-­Flusberg, D.J. Cohen (Eds.). (рр. 335–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Kornev, A.N. (2006). Bases of Pediatric Locopathology: Clinical and Psychological Aspects. Saint Petersburg: Rech’. (In Russ.).
  19. Bloom, L., & Tinker, E. (2001). The intentionality model and language acquisition: engagement, effort, and the essential tension in development. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev, 66(4), 1–91.
  20. Ushakova, T.N. (2004). Speech: origins and principles of development. Mоscow: Per Se. (In Russ.).
  21. Bloom, L. (2013). One word at a time: The use of single word utterances before syntax. Paris: Mouton Publ.
  22. Anohin, P.K. (2024). Essays on the physiology of functional systems. Mоscow: RUGRAM. (In Russ.).
  23. Chernyshov, V.N., & Chernyshov, A.V. (2008). Systems theory and system analysis. Tambov: Tambov State Technical University Publ.
  24. Vasiliev, Y.S., Volkova, V.N., & Kozlov, V.N. (2021). Systems theory and system analysis: origins and prospects. System analysis in design and management: collection of scientific papers of the XXV International scientific and educational-practical conference, October 13-14, 2021: in 3 parts. (1), 7–29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18720/SPBPU/2/id21-45 EDN: GAXEJU
  25. MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1994). The Competition Model and UG. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
  26. Gvozdev, A.N. (2007). Issues of children’s speech study. Saint Petersburg: Detstvo-­Press. (In Russ.).
  27. Ceytlin, S.N. (2000). Language and Child: Linguistics of Children’s Speech. Mоscow: Gumanit. izd. tsentr VLADOS. (In Russ.).
  28. Millar, S. (2003). Children and linguistic normativity. In: Social Dialectology (pp. 287–297). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  29. Worle, M., Essler, S., & Paulus, M. (2019). Paying it back and forward: The impact of experiencing and observing others’ sharing and stinginess on preschoolers’ own sharing behavior and expectations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 198.
  30. Rojas-­Nieto, C. (2024). Normative talk about talk in child-­caregiver interaction in Mexican families. Sciendo, 28(1), 350–388.
  31. Slobin, D.I. (1979). Psycholinguistics. New York: Berkeley Book.
  32. VanDam, M., Thompson, L., Wilson-­Fowler, E., Campanella, S., Wolfenstein, K., & De Palma, P. (2022). Conversation initiation of mothers, fathers, and toddlers in their natural home environment. Computer Speech & Language, 73, 101338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2021.101338 EDN: SKIGVP
  33. Artemis, P.P., Izabel, H., Hansel, S.H., Pâmela, C.C., Yulia, S., & Nara, A.C. (2023). The genesis of the ‘animation complex’ concept in the historical-­cultural psychology. Cultural-­Historical Psychology, 19(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2023190212 EDN: MPHWST
  34. Snow, C.E., Pan, B.A., Imbens‐Bailey, A., & Herman, J. (1996). Learning how to say what one means: A longitudinal study of children’s speech act use. Social Development, 5(1), 56–84.
  35. Lisina, M.I. (1985). Communication and speech: development of speech in children in communication with adults. Mоscow: Pedagogika publ. (In Russ.).
  36. Lisina, M.I. (1986). Problems of ontogenesis of communication. Mоscow: Pedagogika. (In Russ.).
  37. Isenina, E.I., & Baranovskaya, T.I. (1999). On the prerequisites of basic qualities of mother. Language and speech theory: history and modernity, 3, 176–182. (In Russ.).
  38. Mussen, P.H., Conger, J.J., Kagan, J., & Huston, A.C. (1987). The development of the child. Mоscow: Progress. (In Russ.).
  39. Isenina, E.I. (2003). On some concepts of ontogenesis of basic qualities of the mother. Perinatal psychology and psychology of parenthood, 4–5, 49–63.
  40. Hübscher, I., & Prieto, P. (2019). Gestural and prosodic development act as sister systems and jointly pave the way for children’s sociopragmatic development. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–16.
  41. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78, 705–722.
  42. Lüke, C., Ritterfeld, U., Grimminger, A., Rohlfing, K.J., & Liszkowski, U. (2020). Integrated communication system: Gesture and language acquisition in typically developing children and children with LD and DLD. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 118–132.
  43. Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-­Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205–226.
  44. Cochet, H., & Vauclair, J. (2010). Features of spontaneous pointing gestures in toddlers. Gesture, 10(1), 86–107.
  45. Fernald, A., & Kuh, P.K. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior & Development, 10(3), 279–293.
  46. Kitamura, C., & Lam, C. (2009). Age‐specific preferences for infant‐directed affective intent. Infancy, 14(1), 77–100.
  47. Nelson, K. (1996). Language and Cognitive Development. The Emergence of the Mediated Mind. New York: CUP.
  48. Clark, E.V. (2016). First Language Acquisition. New York: CUP.
  49. Sakkalou, E., & Gattis, M. (2012). Infants infer intentions from prosody. Cognitive Development, 27(1), 1–16.
  50. Christophe, A., & Dupoux, E. (1996). Bootstrapping lexical acquisition: the role of prosodic structure. The Linguistic Review, 13(3–4), 383–412.
  51. Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Nelson, D.G K., & Jusczyk, P.W. (2003). The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 249–267.
  52. Gärdenfors, P. (2007). Mind-­reading as Control Theory. European Review, 15(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798707000233 EDN: HZJWZL
  53. Baron-­Cohen, S. (2014). The eye direction detector (EDD) and the shared attention mechanism (SAM). In: Two cases for evolutionary psychology. Joint Attention. Psychology Press, Ch. Moore,, (Eds.). (рр. 41–59). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  54. Trevarthen, C. (2005). First things first: Infants make good use of the sympathetic rhythm of imitation, without reason or language. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 31(1), 91–113.
  55. Clark, R. (1977). What’s the use of imitation? Journal of Child Language, 4, 341–358.
  56. Sergienko, E.A. (2008). Cognitive nature of speech “explosion”. Psychological studies, 1(1), 1–21. (In Russ.).
  57. Obukhova, L.F. (1994). Forms and functions of imitation in childhood. Moscow: Publ. Moscow State University. (In Russ.).
  58. Rizzolatti, G., & Buccino, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its role in imitation and language. In: From Monkey Brain to Human Brain,, ,, (Eds.) (рр. 213–234). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  59. Vihman, M.M. (2002). The role of mirror neurons in the ontogeny of speech. In: Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, M.I. Stamenov, V. Gallese (Eds.) (рр. 305–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Company.
  60. Donald, M. (2005). Imitation and mimesis. In: Perspectives on Imitation. Neuroscience to Social Science: Vol. 2. Imitation, Human Development, and Culture, S. Hurley, N. Chater (Eds.) (рр. 283–300). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  61. Alott, R. (2003). Imitation in language and speech. Roles and functional base. In: Proceedings of the AISB’03 Second International Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts 7th–11th April 2003 (рр. 105–112). Wales: The University of Aberystwyth Wales.
  62. Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2005). Intention Reading and Imitative Learning. In: Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science: Vol. 2. Imitation, Human Development, and Culture S. Hurley, N. Chater (Eds.) (рр. 300–317). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  63. Meltzoff, A. (2005). Imitation and other minds. The “Like me” hypothesis). In: Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science: Vol. 2. Imitation, Human Development, and Culture S. Hurley, N. Chater (Eds.) (рр. 317–333). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  64. Shimpi, P.M., Akhtar, N., & Moore, C. (2013). Toddlers’ imitative learning in interactive and observational contexts: The role of age and familiarity of the model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 309–323.
  65. Ferguson, C.A., & Farwell, C.B. (2013). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. (M.M. Vihman, T. Keren-­Portnoy (Eds.)) In: The Emergence of Phonology: Whole-­Word Approaches and Cross-­Linguistic Evidence (рр. 93–132). New York: CUP.
  66. Keren-­Portnoy, T., Vihman, M., & Fisher, R.L. (2019). Do infants learn from isolated words? An ecological study. Language Learning and Development, 15(1), 47–63.
  67. Sokolov, A.N. (2007). Internal speech and thinking. Moscow: USSR. (In Russ.).
  68. Sato, M., Tremblay, P., & Gracco, V.L. (2009). A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation. Brain and Language, 111(1), 1–7.
  69. Skipper, J.I., Devlin, J.T., & Lametti, D.R. (2017). The hearing ear is always found close to the speaking tongue: Review of the role of the motor system in speech perception. Brain and Language, 164, 77–105.
  70. James, K.H., & Maouene, J. (2009). Auditory verb perception recruits motor systems in the developing brain: An fMRI investigation. Developmental Science, 12(6), F26–F34.
  71. Newcombe, N.S., Balcomb, F., Ferrara, K., Hansen, M., & Koski, J. (2014). Two rooms, two representations? Episodic‐like memory in toddlers and preschoolers. Developmental Science, 17(5), 743–756.
  72. Stern, A.S. (1990). Perceptive aspect of speech activity [PhD thesis]. Leningrad. (In Russ.).
  73. Vinarskaja, E.N., & Bogomolova, G.M. (2005). Age phonetics. Moscow: ACT. (In Russ.).
  74. Friederici, A.D. (2008). Brain Correlates of Language Processing during the First Years of Life. Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  75. Lepskaya, N.I. (2013). Child’s language: speech communication ontogeny. Moscow: Russian State University of Humanities Publ. (In Russ.).
  76. Eliseeva, M.B. (2008). Phonetic and lexical development of the child at an early age. Saint Petersburg: Herzen University. (In Russ.).
  77. Morgan, W. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on early vocalizations and babbling. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 40(1), 3–14.
  78. Smith, A. (2010). Development of neural control of orofacial movements for speech. In: The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, W.J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, F.E. Gibbon (Eds.) (pp. 251–296). Oxford: Blackwell Publ. Ltd.
  79. Losik, G.V. (2001). Psychological concept of motor theory of perception of speech. In: T.N. Ushakova, N.V. Ufintsev (Еds.). Children’s speech: psycholinguistic research (рр. 9–22). Moscow: Perce.
  80. Chishnovich, L.A., Ventsov, A.V., & Granström, M.P. (1976). Physiology of speech. Perception of human speech. Leningrad: Nauka publ. (In Russ.).
  81. Fagan, M.K. (2015). Why repetition? Repetitive babbling, auditory feedback, and cochlear implantation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1(37), 125–136.
  82. Kröger, B.J., & Bekolay, T. (2019). The LS Model (Lexicon-­Syllabary Model). In: Neural Modeling of Speech Processing and Speech Learning: An Introduction (рр. 239–262). Luxembourg: Springer.
  83. Kröger, B.J., Bekolay, T., & Cao, M. (2022). On the emergence of phonological knowledge and on motor planning and motor programming in a developmental model of speech production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 844529.
  84. Kornev, A.N. (2000). Articulatory and verbal inconsistency in children. In: Speech disorders. Multidisciplinary approach to study, diagnosis and correction (рр. 191–197). Saint Petersburg. (In Russ.).
  85. Isenina, E.I. (1986). Psychological foundations of speech ontogenesis in the initial period [PhD thesis]. Moscow. (In Russ.).
  86. Vinarska, E.H. (1987). Early speech development of the child and problems of defectology. Moscow: Prosvyashchenie publ. (In Russ.). (In Russ.).
  87. Kazakovskaya, V.V. (2006). Question and answer unity in dialogue “adult-­child”. Saint Petersburg: Nauka publ. (In Russ.).
  88. Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M.J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57(6), 1454–1463.
  89. Bates, E. (1979). Intentions, conventions, and symbols. In: Cognition and Communication in Infancy (рр. 33–68). New York: Academic Press.
  90. Austin, J.L. (1989). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  91. Searl, J. (1977). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: CUP.
  92. Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow & Co.
  93. Nagy, W.E., Diakidoy, I.A.N., & Anderson, R.C. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of reading Behavior, 25(2), 155–170.
  94. Dąbrowska, E., & Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 437–474.
  95. Vihman, M.M. (2022). The developmental origins of phonological memory. Psychological Review, 129(6), 1495–1508. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000354 EDN: ILSYXV
  96. Behrens, H. (2016). The role of analogy in language processing and acquisition. In: M. Hundt, S. Mollin, S. Pfenninger (Eds.) The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. (рр. 215–239). New York: CUP.
  97. Gentner, D., & Hoyos, C. (2017). Analogy and Abstraction. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 672–693.
  98. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-­Critical Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  99. Ullman, M.T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37–69.
  100. Ritzsolatti, D., & Sinigallia, K. (2012). Mirrors in the brain. About mechanisms of joint action and compassion. Mоscow: Yazyki Clavyanskikh Kul’tur. (In Russ.).
  101. Moroshkina, N.V., Ivanchey, I.I., & Karpov, A.D. (2017). Implicit science. In: V.F. Spiridonov. Selected sections of the psychology of science (рp. 223–275). Mоscow: Delo. Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service under the President of the Russian Federation Publ. (In Russ.).
  102. Reber, P.J. (2013). The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 2026–2042.
  103. Reber, P.J., Batterink, L.J., Thompson, K.R., & Reuveni, B. (2019). Implicit learning: History and applications. In: Implicit Learning, A. Cleeremans, V. Allakhverdov, M. Kuvaldina (Eds) (рр. 16–37). Abingdon: Routledge.
  104. Casasola, M., Bhagwat, J., & Ferguson, K.T. (2006). Precursors to verb learning: Infants’ understanding of motion events. In: Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs, K. Hirsh-­Pasek, R.M. Golinkoff (Eds.) (рр. 160–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  105. Childers, J.B., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Are nouns easier to learn than verbs? Three experimental studies. In: Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs, K. Hirsh-­Pasek, R.M. Golinkoff (Eds.) (рр. 311–335). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  106. Gampe, A., Brauer, J., & Daum, M.M. (2016). Imitation is beneficial for verb learning in toddlers. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(5), 594–613.
  107. Luria, A.R. (1962). Higher cortical functions of the human being and their violations in local brain lesions. Moscow: Moscow University Publ. (In Russ.).
  108. Balčiūnienė, I. (2009). Pokalbio struktūros analizė kalbos įsisavinimo požiūriu (daktaro disertacija) = Analysis of conversational structure from the perspective of language acquisition [PhD thesis]. Kaunas.
  109. Balčiūnienė, I., & Kornev, A.N. (2024). Linguistic disfluencies in Russian-­speaking typically and atypically developing children: individual variability in different contexts. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 38(4), 287–306.
  110. Golinkoff, R.M. (1986). “I beg your pardon?”: The preverbal negotiation of failed messages. Journal of Child Language, 13(3), 455–476.
  111. Scollon, R. (1976). Conversations with a One-­Year-Old. A Case Study of the Developmental Foundation of Syntax. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  112. Levelt, C., van den Brink, E., & Karlsson, J. (2023). Prompted self-­repairs in two-­year-old children. In: Segmental Structure and Representations, J. van de Weijer (Ed.). P.I. (рр. 227–248). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  113. Clark, E.V. (2020). Conversational repair and the acquisition of language. Discourse Processes, 57(5–6), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2020.1719795 EDN: RVEHCZ
  114. Gomes, H., Molholm, S., Christodoulou, C., Ritter, W., & Cowan, N. (2000). The development of auditory attention in children. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5(1), 108–120.
  115. Kent, R.D. (2000). Research on speech motor control and its disorders: A review and prospective. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33(5), 391–428.
  116. Kornev, A.N. (2000). Toward a neuropsychological model of phonological development. In: Becoming Loquens. More Studies in Language Origins, B. Bichakjian (Ed.) (рр. 201–209). Bern: Peter Lang.
  117. Gabriel, A., Maillart, C., Guillaume, M., Stefaniak, N., & Meulemans, T. (2011). Exploration of serial structure procedural learning in children with language impairment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(2), 336–343.
  118. Bishop, D.V.M. (2014). Uncommon Understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. New York: Psychology..
  119. Dunn, K.J., Frost, R.L., & Monaghan, P. (2024). Infants’ attention during cross-­situational word learning: Environmental variability promotes novelty preference. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 241, 105859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105859 EDN: NUFVLH
  120. Ullman, M.T., & Pierpont, E.I. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41(3), 399–433.
  121. McEwen, F., Happé, F., Bolton, P., Rijsdijk, F., Ronald, A., Dworzynski, K., & Plomin, R. (2007). Origins of individual differences in imitation: Links with language, pretend play, and socially insightful behavior in two‐year‐old twins. Child Development, 78(2), 474–492.
  122. Pelucchi, B., Hay, J.F., & Saffran, J.R. (2009). Statistical learning in a natural language by 8‐month‐old infants. Child Development, 80(3), 674–685.
  123. Richtsmeier, P.T., & Goffman, L. (2023). Statistical learning of phonotactics by children can be affected by another statistical learning task. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(6), 1124–1142. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716423000449 EDN: ORAKOG
  124. Bogaerts, L., Siegelman, N., Christiansen, M.H., & Frost, R. (2022). Is there such a thing as a ‘good statistical learner’? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.012 EDN: RNBFWQ
  125. Sergienko, E.A. (2006). Early cognitive development: A new perspective. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Publ. (In Russ.).
  126. Kornev, A.N. (2001). The main indicators of mental maturity in children at an early age. In: Current problems of locopathology: research and correction. Mat. science.-law. conf. «Diagnosis and correction of speech disorders: historical traditions and ways of improvement», dedicated. 10th anniversary of the activity of the Association of Logopaths of Saint-­Petersburg and the region. SPb. (рр. 37–45). Saint ­Petersburg. (In Russ.).
  127. Pukhova, T.I. (2005). Symbolic game and general development from two to three years. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola psikhologii. (In Russ.).
  128. Piaget, J. (2013). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge.
  129. Elkonin, D.B. (2007). Child Psychology. Moscow: Akademiya. (In Russ.).
  130. Russell, J., & Hanna, R. (2012). A minimalist approach to the development of episodic memory. Mind & Language, 27(1), 29–54.
  131. Machin, R.I. (2015). Brain Control Systems. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity by I.P. Pavlov, 65(1), 33–60.
  132. Filipe, M.G., Veloso, A.S., & Frota, S. (2023). Executive functions and language skills in preschool children: The unique contribution of verbal working memory and cognitive flexibility. Brain Sciences, 10/13(3), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030470 EDN: TCGPKA
  133. Suvorov, N.F. & Tairov, O.P. (1985). Psychophysiological mechanisms of selective attention. Leningrad: Nauka.
  134. Bruner, J. Foreword. (2014). In: Joint Attention, Ch. Moore, Ph.J. Dunham, Ph. Dunham (Eds.) (рр. 1–14). Abington: Psychology Press.
  135. Adamson, L.B., Suma, K., Bakeman, R., Kellerman, A. & Robins, D.L. (2021). Auditory joint attention skills: Development and diagnostic differences during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 63, 101560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101560 EDN: LDBXTG
  136. Kuhl, P.K. (2004). Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533 EDN: LRQXTD
  137. Kuhl, P.K .(2008). Linking infant speech perception to language acquisition. In: J. Colombo, P. McCardle, L. Freund (Eds.) Infant Pathways to Language: Methods, Models, and Research Directions (pp. 213–244). Abington: Psychology Press.
  138. Meltzoff, A.N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: re-­enactment of intended acts by 18-month-­old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838–850.
  139. Jusczyk, P.W., & Luce, P.A. (2002). Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Past and present. Ear and Hearing, 23(1), 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200202000-00002 EDN: LRQWDZ
  140. Liberman, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Shankweiler, D.P., & Studdert-­Kennedy, M. (1976). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431–461.
  141. Liberman, A.M., & Mattingly, I.G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 2(1), 1–36.
  142. Sekiyama, K., Hisanaga, S., & Mugitani, R. (1985). Selective attention to the mouth of a talker in Japanese-­learning infants and toddlers: Its relationship with vocabulary and compensation for noise. Cortex, 140, 145–156.
  143. Levelt, C.C., Schiller, N.O., & Levelt, W.J. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition, 8(3), 237–264.
  144. Goffman, L., & Smith, A. (1999). Development and phonetic differentiation of speech movement patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 253, 649–660.
  145. Jang, J., Choe, Y.G., & Ha, S. (2020). Characteristics of diadochokinesis in typically developing children and adults. Audiology and Speech Research, 17(1), 73–80.
  146. Salachov, A.D. (1973). Development of the sound side of the child’s speech. (Diary of the mother). Mоscow: Pedagogika publ. (In Russ.).
  147. Beltukov, V.I. (1977). Interaction of analyzers in the process of perception and assimilation of oral speech (In norm and pathology). Mоscow: Pedagogika publ. (In Russ.).
  148. Voeykova, M.D. (2015). Formation of the name: early stages of children’s assimilation of named morphology of Russian language. Mоscow: Languages of Slavic cultures. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».