A “White Spot” in History of Linguistic Thought: the Jewish Grammatical Tradition
- Autores: Khukhuni G.T.1, Budman Y.D.2,3
-
Afiliações:
- Federal State University of Education
- The Kosygin State University of Russia
- St. Petersburg University
- Edição: Volume 16, Nº 2 (2025): Current issues in psycholinguistics, cross-cultural studies, and multichannel communication
- Páginas: 474-486
- Seção: LANGUAGE THEORY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323524
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2025-16-2-474-486
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FZJFFM
- ID: 323524
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The history of the Jewish grammatical tradition is represented very scantily in Russian linguistic historiography, because, due to objective causes, many Jewish linguistic sources, as well as publications by foreign colleagues on the topic, were inaccessible to Soviet and Russian scholars. The aim of the study is to fill this gap and justify the reasons why this tradition deserves much more attention from researchers than it has received so far. The material for the research consists of Russian academic publications and coursebooks on the history of linguistic thought. The study proves that the Jewish linguistic thought is an independent tradition, which is of interest to researchers. The authors also raise the issue of its insufficient coverage in Russian academic literature. The study uses the method of comparative study of various Russian academic publications on the history of linguistic thought correlating the obtained data with material from foreign works and with ancient and medieval Jewish sources. General results: 1) today about three quarters of the existing Russian academic literature on the topic do not even mention the Jewish grammatical tradition, and those works and coursebooks that do are based on incomplete and/or inaccurate data; 2) the Jewish linguistic thought is always presented in Russian linguistic historiography as depended on two other traditions: the Arabic one and the Christian Hebraistics. As a result, there could be made an incorrect assumption that the Jewish grammatical tradition per se is not relevant for study; 3) the Jewish grammatical tradition should be considered an independent page in the history of linguistic thought, without dissolving it into the Arabic tradition.
Sobre autores
Georgy Khukhuni
Federal State University of Education
Email: khukhuni@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7423-5393
Código SPIN: 3656-9529
Scopus Author ID: 57204197917
Researcher ID: AAG-6340-2021
D.Sc. (Philology), Full Professor, Professor of the Department of the Theory of Language, English Studies and Applied Linguistics
10A/2 Radio st, Moscow, Russian Federation, 105005Yulia Budman
The Kosygin State University of Russia; St. Petersburg University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: budman-yud@rguk.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9015-530X
Código SPIN: 1567-1390
Scopus Author ID: 57862990200
Researcher ID: CAF-1586-2022
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Philology and Linguocultural Studies of The Kosygin State University of Russia; Senior Research Fellow of the Department of Jewish Theology and Jewish Culture, St Petersburg University
33/1 Sadovnicheskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 115035; 7-9 Universitetskaya Embankment, St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199034Bibliografia
- Trubeckoj, N.S. (1985). N.S. Trubetzkoy’s Letters and Notes. Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110888010
- Alpatov, V.M. (2024). History of Linguistic Thought. Moscow: Jurajt publ. (In Russ.).
- Ajhenval’d, A.Ju. (1988). Problems of Phonology and Morphology in the Conceptions of Jewish Grammarians (On the Material of the Sources from the 9th–12th centuries). In: Linguistic Traditions in the Lands of the East (pp. 43–47). Moscow: Nauka publ. (In Russ.).
- Klijnsmit, A. (1988). Amsterdam Sephardim and Hebrew Grammar in the Seventeenth Century. Studia Rosenthaliana, 22(2), 144–164.
- Reif, S. (1979). Sabbethai Sofer and His Prayer-Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zwiep, I. (2009). Linguistic Knowledge: Grammar and Literacy in Early Modern Ashkenaz Simon Dubnow Institute Yearbook, 8, 279–298.
- Fruchtman, M. (1999). Unique Grammatical Approach in Medieval Commentary of Piyyutim. Linguistic Studies in “Sefer Arugath Ha-Bosem” by Rabbi Abraham Ben Azriel. Beer Sheva: Ben Gurion University. (In Heb.).
- Wormser, Y. (2021). Hebrew Grammar in Ashkenaz in Early Modern Times: The Linguistic Theory of Rabbi Zalman Hena (Hanau). Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute. (In Heb.).
- Neljubin, L.L., & Khukhuni, G.T. (2022). History of Language Science. Moscow: Flinta publ. (In Russ.).
- Alefirenko, N.F. (2013). History of Linguistic Thought. Belgorod: Belgorod publ. (In Russ.).
- Amirova, T.A., Ol’hovikov, B.A., & Rozhdestvenskij, Yu.V. (2005). History of Linguistics. Moscow: Akademija publ. (In Russ.). EDN: QRXMND
- Boronnikova, N.V., & Levickij, Ju.A. (2013). History of Linguistic Thought. Moscow: Direct-Media publ. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23681/210685 EDN: SULTQZ
- Budejko, V.Je. (2006). History of Linguistic Thought. Chelyabinsk: Poligraf-Master publ. (In Russ.).
- Ermakova, L.A. (2021). History of Linguistic Thought. Kostroma: KGU publ. (In Russ.). EDN: YRSSZG
- Kondrashov, N.A. (1979). History of Linguistic Thought. Moscow: Prosveshhenie publ. (In Russ.).
- Lykova, N.N. (2021). History of Linguistics. Texts and Personalia. Moscow: Flinta publ. (In Russ.).
- Susov, I.P. (2006). History of Linguistics. Moscow: Vostok — Zapad publ. (In Russ.).
- Shulezhkova, S.G. (2022). History of Linguistic Thought. Moscow: Flinta publ. (In Russ.).
- Loja, Ja.V. (1968). History of Linguistic Thought. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola publ. (In Russ.).
- Baer, S., & Strack, H. (1879). Die Dikduke Ha-Teamim des Ahron ben Moscheh ben Ascher. Leipzig: Verlag von L. Fernau. (In Heb.).
- Dotan, A. (2005). The Awakening of Word Lore. From the Masora to the Beginning of Hebrew Lexicography. Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language. (In Heb.).
- Guggenheimer, H. (2004). The Jerusalem Talmud. Third Order: Našim. Tractate Yebamot. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (In Heb.).
- Epstein, B. (1904). Torah Temimah. Vol. 1. Vilnius: Romm publishing house. (In Heb.).
- Bacher, W. (1895). Die Anfänge der hebräischen Grammatik. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 49(1), 335–392. https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.4.05bac
- Budman, Yu.D. (2017). The Semitic Root: Process of the Concept Development (VIIth-Xth Cent). Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 3, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712Х-2017-3-108-116 EDN: ZAESMZ
- Maman, A. (2023). Hebrew Lexicography: Dictionaries and Words. Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute. (In Heb.).
- Martinez Delgado, J. (2023). The Hebrew Linguistic Tradition In: The Cambridge History of Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511842788.012
- Dotan, A. (1997). The dawn of Hebrew linguistics: The Book of Elegance of the Language of the Hebrews by Saadia Gaon. Vol. 2. Jerusalem: The World Union of Jewish Studies.
- Budman, Yu. (2022). Christian Hebraistics with Jewish Roots: Philippe D’aquin and His Dictionary. Uchenye Zapiski Natsional’nogo Obshchestva Prikladnoi Lingvistiki, 4(40), 8–22. EDN: GYOQAO
Arquivos suplementares
