Development of Private Property Law: A Comparative Analysis
- Authors: Saudakhanov M.V.1, Chikhladze L.T.1
-
Affiliations:
- RUDN University
- Issue: Vol 30, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 156-174
- Section: CIVIL LAW
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2337/article/view/406092
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-1-156-174
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RQSGTC
- ID: 406092
Cite item
Abstract
The article is devoted to a comprehensive comparative legal analysis of the genesis and evolution of private property law. The study covers a wide historical period - from antiquity to the present - and examines the development of this institution in various legal systems (Roman law, the law of Ancient Mesopotamia and Greece, Russian pre-revolutionary, Soviet, and modern constitutional law, as well as the experience of the USA, Germany, France, China, and other countries). The relevance of the work stems from the fundamental role of private property as the foundation of legal systems and economic development, as well as the need to identify common trends and national peculiarities in its regulation at present. The purpose of this work is to determine universal and specific patterns in the development of constitutional and legal regulation of social relations in the sphere of private property. The work sequentially addresses the tasks of studying its origin, stages of historical development, and modern constitutional and legal status. The scientific novelty lies in combining historical-legal retrospect with synchronous comparative analysis, which enables proposing a periodization of the evolution of the institution and formulating conclusions about the convergence of national models. The key conclusion of the article is the transformation of private property law: from an absolute individual right, it has evolved into an institution performing a social function, accompanied not by a weakening but by a strengthening of its guarantees through the development of international legal protection mechanisms and the activities of constitutional justice bodies.
About the authors
Marat V. Saudakhanov
RUDN University
Author for correspondence.
Email: viento_del_norte@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1117-8117
SPIN-code: 1920-1554
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Municipal Law
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str, Moscow 117198, Russian FederationLevan T. Chikhladze
RUDN University
Email: Levanbook@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8807-2572
SPIN-code: 9107-0406
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Full Professor, Head of the Department of Municipal Law
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str, Moscow 117198, Russian FederationReferences
- Belkharoev, H. U. (2009) The agrarian reform of P.A. Stolypin. Problems of Economics and Legal Practice. (5), 32-34. (In Russian). EDN: LMAQMX.
- Bondar, N. S. (2017) Economic constitutionalism of Russia. Essays on theory and practice. Moscow, Norma-Infra-M Publ. (In Russian).
- Bondarenko, N. L. (2018) Social function of property rights in the context of the constitutional principle of its inviolability. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right. (28), 106-116. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/28/10 EDN: UTOLDY.
- Bukhonova, L.F. (2016) Tendencies and perspectives of the development of the constitutional right to private property in the modern world. Actual problems of Russian law. (1 (62)), 50-57. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2016.62.1.050-057 EDN: VUTHHP.
- Chirkin, V.E. (2015) The right of private property. Constitutional evolution. Journal of Russian Law. (4), 25-36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.12737/10446 EDN: TQSVLJ.
- Garner, B. A. (1987) A dictionary of modern legal usage. New York, Oxford Publ.
- Grossman, G. (1977) The second Economy of the USSR. Problems of Communism. 26 (5), 25-40.
- Grossman, G. (1983) The ‘shadow economy’ in the socialist sector of the USSR. The CMEA five year plans (1981-1985) in a new perspective. Brussels, NATO, Economic and Information Directorates Publ.
- Katsenelinboigen, A. (1977) Coloured markets in the Soviet Union. Europe-Asia Studies. 29 (1), 62-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668137708411106
- Kikot-Glukhodedova, T.V. (2011) Features of the creation of the constitution in the USA. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. (7), 88-91. (In Russian). EDN: OMBGER.
- Marks, K. & Еhngel’s, F. (1976) The Manifesto of the Communist Party. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russian).
- Mars, G. & Altman, Y. (1983) The cultural bases of Soviet Georgia’s second economy. Soviet Studies. 35 (4), 546-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668138308411503
- Mommsen, T. (1854) Römische Geschichte. Band 1: Bis zur Schlacht von Pydna [Roman history. Vol. 1: Until the Battle of Pydna]. Berlin, Weidmann Publ. (In German).
- Montias, J.M. & Rose-Ackerman, S. (1981) Corruption in a Soviet-type economy: Theoretical considerations. In: Rosefield, S. (ed.) Economic welfare and the economics of Soviet Socialism: essays in honor of Abraham Bergson. New York, Cambridge University Press.
- Mitteis, H. (1949) Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte [German legal History]. München, Biederstein Publ. (In German).
- Preuss, H. (1915) Das deutsche Volk und die Politik [The German people and politics]. Berlin, Metropol Publ. (In German).
- Simis, K. (1982) USSR: the corrupt society. New York, Simon and Schuster Publ.
- Singer, J. W. (2014) Property Law: Rules, Policies & Practices. Aspen, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business Publ.
- Shashkova, A.V. (2019) Overview of the rights, freedoms and duties of the individual in Italy. Law and the State: theory and practice. (2 (170)), 51-53. (In Russian). EDN: STBBUP.
- Timofeev, L.M. (2000) Property law in the USSR. Communist doctrine and shadow reality. Russia and the modern world. (4 (29)), 53-66. (In Russian). EDN: BBVYKH.
- Wiles, P. (1983) What we still don’t know about the Soviet economy. CMEA five year plans (1981-1985) in a new perspective. Brussels (NATO). 35 (4), 546-560.
Supplementary files

