Prometheus by S.I. Taneyev and A.N. Scriabin: Stylistic parallels in the interpretation of the mythosymbolic image
- 作者: Tereshchenko V.P.1
-
隶属关系:
- 期: 编号 3 (2023)
- 页面: 23-33
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2453-613X/article/view/365846
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/STMXMG
- ID: 365846
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Two chronologically close musical interpretations of the myth of the ancient titan Prometheus are considered as the subject of the study: the symphonic poem by A.N. Scriabin and the chorus by S.I. Taneyev from the cycle "Twelve Choirs for Mixed Voices to the poems of Ya.P. Polonsky". The article discusses the specifics of the interpretation of Prometheus, one of the central symbols of European culture. It is noted that over its long history, the content of the Prometheus myth has been interpreted in a wide range from a rebel who goes to self-sacrifice for humanity, to an inspired artist-creator who revealed the benefits of culture to people; from the holy great martyr and prophet of the true God, to the leader of the revolutionary masses of the people. As a result of the analysis, it is concluded that the central motive in Taneyev's work is the vocation of the artist, who goes to self-sacrifice against the forces of evil and ignorance. In Scriabin, Prometheus is interpreted as the active creative energy of the Universe, entering into a struggle with matter and transforming it. The analysis also reveals a number of stylistic parallels in the legacy of the two composers, such as philosophical conceptuality, monumentality of the idea and its implementation, striving for the transformation of a person through art, rational foundations of creativity, orientation to Western European art samples. As opposite stylistic features, the composers belong to different poles of protectiveness and innovation in art, and different approaches to the use of the literary word are noted. The influence of innovative insights of composers on the development of musical art of the XX century is emphasized.
参考
Аминова, Г.У. Модель мира в творчестве С.И. Танеева. Канд. дисс. Красноярск, 1998. – 162 с."em" "/em" Асафьев, Б.В. Русская музыка: XIX и начало XX века. – Л.: Музыка, 1979. – 344 с."em" "/em" Барас, К.В. Эзотерика «Прометея» // Нижегородский скрябинский альманах. – Нижний Новгород: Из-во «Нижегородская ярмарка», 1995. – С. 100-117."em" "/em" Блаватская, Е.П. Тайная доктрина. Синтез науки, религии и философии. Том 2. Антропогенезис / пер. с анг. Е. Рерих — М.: Эксмо, 2004. – 944 с."em" "/em" Бэлза, И.Ф. Александр Николаевич Скрябин. – М.: Музыка, 1982. – 175 с."em" "/em" Корабельникова, Л.З. Творчество С. И. Танеева: Историко-стилистическое исследование. – М.: Музыка, 1986. – 296 с."em" "/em" "em" "/em"История русской музыки: В 10-ти Т. – Т. 10 А: Конец XIX – начало XX в. / А.А. Баева, С.Г. Зверева, Ю.В. Келдыш, Т.Н. Левая, М.П. Рахманова, А.М. Соколова, М.Е. Тараканов. – М.: Музыка, 1997. – 542 с."em" "/em" Левая, Т.Н. Русская музыка начала XX века в художественном контексте эпохи. – М.: Музыка, 1991. – 166 с."em" "/em" Лосев, А.Ф. Проблема символа и реалистическое искусство. – 2-е изд., испр. – М.: Искусство, 1995. – 320 с."em" "/em" Луначарский, А.В."em" "/em"Танеев и Скрябин // В мире музыки. – М.: Сов. композитор, 1971. – 539 с."em" "/em" Сабанеев, Л. Л. Воспоминания о Скрябине. – М.: Классика-XXI, 2000. – 391 с."em" "/em" Сабанеев, Л.Л. Воспоминания о Танееве. – М.: Классика-XXI, 2003. – 196 с."em" "/em" Танеев, С.И. Мысли о собственной творческой работе // Памяти С.И. Танеева. – М: Музгиз, 1947. – С. 179-182."em" "/em" Танеев, С.И. Подвижной контрапункт строгого письма. – М.: Музгиз, 1959. – 383 с."em" "/em" "em" "/em"Сергей Слонимский – собеседник. – Изд. 2-е, испр. и доп. / Ред.-сост. Е.Б. Долинская. – Спб.: Композитор Санкт-Петербург, 2015. – 196 с.
补充文件
