Structural and floristics characteristics of three typical successional stages of the tropical evergreen broadleaf forest in Kon Chu Rang Nature Reserve, Gia Lai Province, Vietnam

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background. Structural and floristic characteristics are a crucial aspect in proposing technical solutions for forest ecosystem restoration. The study was conducted in Kon Chu Rang Natural Reserve, Gia Lai, Vietnam. The differences in structure (such as density, tree size, abundance, diversity, species composition, etc.) between secondary and old-growth forests were shown in the several previous researches. However, within secondary forests, different histories of disturbance have resulted in very different stages of forest succession, despite the same length of time since human influence ceased and the same protection conditions. Secondary forests recovering after shifting cultivation, with directly light and fast-growing species, have higher density and abundance, while tree size indices and the number of dominant species are lower compared to secondary forests recovering after logging, which are mainly composed of shade-tolerant species. The research results provided a basis for group classification and the application of silvicultural measures to effectively promote forest recovery processes.

Purpose. To study the potential for natural successional recovery as a basis for proposing the application of silvicultural measures to rehebilitate the evergreen closed tropical rain forest in the Kon Ha Nung Biosphere Reserve.

Materials and methods. The subject of the study was the tropical evergreen broadleaf forest types in Kon Chu Rang Nature Reserve. In this study, satellite imagery (Landsat 8) was collected in the same season from 2013 to 2022 and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index was calculated to determine the forest successional stages of tropical evergreen broadleaf rainforest in Kon Chu Rang Nature Reserve. The results of classification combined with field survey based on the establishment of 09 permanent sample plots (50×50 m, 2,500 m²) to ensure the forest successional stages. These plots were established in each typical successional stage (secondary forest after logging, secondary forest after shifting cultivation, and old-growth forest). In each plot, all live woody stems with a diameter at breast height greater than 10 cm were measured, including tree diameter at breast height and tree species. All data collected in each plot were then used for data analysis using SPSS software. This research conducted an ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) with a Fisher's Least Significant Difference post hoc test to explore differences between multiple group means of tree density, number of trees distribution in each group of tree diameter, tree diameter, basal area and tree diversity. In addition, to investigate forest structure and diversity, the Impotance Value Index, Shannon-Wiener Index (He') and Simpson Index, and Jaccard's coefficient of similarity were calculated in this study.

Results. Tree density ranged from 347 to 763 stems per hectare and total basal area from 15.5 to 42.8 m² per hectare. No significant difference was observed among the three forest types for tree diameter classes from 10 to 25 cm, while for tree diameter classes greater than 25 cm, old growth forest had the highest tree density, significantly different from the others. A decrease in tree density was observed in all forest types except old growth, which had the highest tree density and basal area for tree diameter classes greater than 25 cm. Diversity was found to be significantly higher in the old-growth forest compared to the secondary forest, which may be due to the duration of the restoration process and the initial stage of disturbance cessation. A total of 31 to 43 tree species were identified in 28-38 genera and 19-22 families, with the lowest species richness observed in the secondary forest after logging and only 3-7 tree species calculated in the tree composition. The dominant species in the post-logging secondary forest were heliophilous and fast-growing tree species such as Machilus parviflora, Macaranga tanarius, Litsea elongata, Clausena sp. and Prunus arborea, whereas in the post-shifting secondary forest they were shade-tolerant such as Rehderodendron truongsonense, Cinnamomum mairei, Castanopsis pseudoserrata, Litsea elongata, Syzygium wightianum. In particular, the associations of Clusiaceae and Myrtaceae species in old-growth forests were a novel finding.

Conclusions. It can be concluded that the structure and diversity characteristics of these successional stages exhibited remarkable variation. The old-growth forest had greater tree density, basal area, tree diversity and evenness than those of in secondary forest, along with the differences in number tree distribution, tree composition and diversity. These differences may come from the regeneration time and site condition. These results suggest that long-term monitoring and research are essential to assess restoration success over time.

Авторлар туралы

Tran Huong

Joint Vietnam-Russian Tropical Science and Technology Research Center

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: thanhhuongfuv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-7555-9212

Cand. Sc. (Silviculture), Junior Researcher

 

Вьетнам, Nguyen Van Huyen Str., Nghia Do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam

Nguyen Hoi

Joint Vietnam-Russian Tropical Science and Technology Research Center

Email: danghoi110@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6832-283X

Cand. Sc. (Geography), Institute of Tropical Ecology, Director

 

Вьетнам, Nguyen Van Huyen Str., Nghia Do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam

Dang Cuong

Joint Vietnam-Russian Tropical Science and Technology Research Center

Email: danghungcuong@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1208-737X

Cand. Sc. (Ecology), Junior Researcher

 

Вьетнам, Nguyen Van Huyen Str., Nghia Do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam

Nguyen T. Minh

Vietnam National University of Forestry

Email: minhnguyen1408@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-1911-601X

Lecturer, Faculty of Forestry, Dr. Agriculture of Science

 

Вьетнам, Xuan Mai, Chuong My, Hanoi, Vietnam

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Bischoff, W., Newbery, D. M., Lingenfelder, M., Schnaeckel, R., Petol, G. H., Madani, L., & Ridsdale, C. E. (2005). Secondary succession and dipterocarp recruitment in Bornean rain forest after logging. Forest Ecology and Management, 218(1–3), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.009
  2. Bonnell, T. R., Reyna Hurtado, R., & Chapman, C. A. (2011). Post logging recovery time is longer than expected in an East African tropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2010.12.016
  3. Chazdon, R. L. (2003). Tropical forest recovery: Legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 6(1–2), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00042
  4. Con, T. V. (2015). Research on integrated solutions to restore and manage watershed protection forest systems in the Central Highlands. Vietnam Academy of Forest Sciences. Ha Noi.
  5. Dong, T. L. (2019). Research to evaluate the succession of forest ecosystem restoration and propose conservation solutions in Dong Nai Biosphere Reserve. Vietnam Academy of Forest Sciences. Ha Noi.
  6. Falkowski, M. J., Evans, J. S., Martinuzzi, S., Gessler, P. E., & Hudak, A. T. (2009). Characterizing forest succession with LiDAR data: An evaluation for the inland Northwest, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(5), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.003
  7. Hang, T., Huong, T., Son, P., & Khai, N. (2023). Application of Delphi method to identify sustainable university assessment criteria for Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 39(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1094/vnuees.4790. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PYAPGA
  8. Hoi, N. D., Dung, N. T., & Cuong, D. H. (2021). Transformation and ecological succession of natural anthropogenic landscapes in Konkakinh Konchurang conservation territory, Vietnam. Environmental Science, Geography, 3(11), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.21072/eco.2021.03.01
  9. Kalacska, M., Sanchez Azofeifa, G. A., Calvo Alvarado, J., Quesada, M., Rivard, B., & Janzen, D. (2004). Species composition, similarity and diversity in three successional stages of a seasonally dry tropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 200, 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.001
  10. Kerkhoff, J. A. (2010). Measuring biodiversity of ecological communities. Retrieved from http://biology.kenyon.edu/courses/biol229/diversity.pdf
  11. Kiswanto, Setiawati, M. D., Wahyulianto, I., & Tsuyuki, S. (2022). Tracking transitions of tropical deforestation in East Kalimantan, Indonesia using time series Landsat images from 2000 to 2016. In M. Rani Chaudhary, B. S., Jamal, S., & Kumar, P. (Eds.), Towards sustainable natural resources. Springer.
  12. KonKaKinh National Park: Forest management and protection at Kon Ka Kinh National Park, Gia Lai Province (2019). Gia Lai Province, Viet Nam.
  13. Kuusipalo, J., Jafarsidik, Y., Ådjers, G., & Tuomela, K. (1996). Population dynamics of tree seedlings in a mixed dipterocarp rainforest before and after logging and crown liberation. Forest Ecology and Management, 81, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03654-7. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ANRFOF
  14. Magurran, A. E. (2021). Measuring biological diversity. Current Biology, 31(19), R1174–R1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.049. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BNQNZF
  15. MARD. (2021). Announcement on the current state of forests nationwide in 2020 (Decision No. 1558/QD BNN TCLN). Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
  16. Martinuzzi, S., Gould, W. A., Vierling, L. A., Hudak, A. T., Nelson, R. F., & Evans, J. S. (2012). Quantifying tropical dry forest type and succession: Substantial improvement with LiDAR. Biotropica, 45, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00904.x
  17. McDonald, T., George, D. G., Justin, J., Kingsley, W. D., James, A., Kris, D. R., James, G. H., et al. (2016). International standards for the practice of ecological restoration — Including principles and key concepts. Society for Ecological Restoration. Washington, D.C.
  18. Meng, J., Lu, Y., Lei, X., & Liu, G. (2011). Structure and floristics of tropical forests and their implications for restoration of degraded forests of China’s Hainan Island. Tropical Ecology, 52(2), 177–191.
  19. Newton, A. (2007). Forest ecology and conservation: A handbook of techniques. Techniques in ecology & conservation. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UVIJKB
  20. Okuda, T., Suzuki, M., Adachi, N., Quah, E. S., Hussein, N. A., & Manokaran, N. (2003). Effect of selective logging on canopy and stand structure and tree species composition in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management, 175, 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00137-8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BDOQMX
  21. Phuc, L. V., Thoa, N. T., Cuong, N. D., & Thong, V. V. (2020). Characteristics of forest vegetation types in Quang Ninh Province. Forestry Science and Technology, 2, 68–77.
  22. Shima, K., Yamada, T., Okuda, T., Fletcher, C., & Kassim, A. R. (2018). Dynamics of tree species diversity in unlogged and selectively logged Malaysian forests. Scientific Reports, 8, 1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19250-z. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KMAMHO
  23. Trung, P. D., Dong, T. L., Tuyet, P. Q., Khuong, N. V., Phuong, N. T. T., & Quy, T. H. (2016). Structure and biodiversity of timber layer of logged over forests in the Dong Nai Culture and Nature Reserve. Vietnam Journal of Forest Science, 4, 4637–4645.
  24. Trung, T. V. (1999). Forest vegetation of Vietnam. Ha Noi, Viet Nam: Science and Technology Publishing House.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қол жетімді Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».