Email this article 
Stochastic Simulation and Development of the Ground Motion Prediction Equation for the Baikal Rift Zone
- Authors: Pavlenko V.A.1, Pavlenko O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 54-66
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0002-3337/article/view/138992
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002333723010039
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BZYNAN
- ID: 138992
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
To obtain realistic and correct estimates of seismic effects in the Baikal Rift Zone (BRZ), a ground motion prediction equation has been developed based on the records of local earthquakes (magnitudes mb ~ 3.4–5.5, hypocentral distances R ~ 15–220 km) obtained by Ulan-Ude and Severomuisk seismic stations. At the first step, in our previous works, using stochastic simulation of the accelerograms of the recorded local earthquakes we estimated the regional parameters of radiation and propagation of seismic waves (stress drop in an earthquake source, quality function of the medium, geometrical spreading, wave attenuation at high frequencies, local site amplification, etc. These parameters were then used to generate a set of earthquake accelerograms over a wide range of magnitudes (Mw ~ 4.0–8.0) and distances (R ~ 1–200 km) on a rock site, and a ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) describing the dependence of peak ground accelerations (PGA) and peak ground velocities (PGV) on magnitude and distance are constructed. The obtained PGA estimates are compared with those estimated from GMPE recommended for BRZ by the international Global Earthquake Model (GEM) project. The scatter of the estimates obtained based on GEM GMPE indicates the relevance of developing the own GMPEs for Russian regions based on the records of local earthquakes. The GMPE derived in this work can be used for seismic hazard assessment in the BRZ eastern part and will be updated as new data are acquired.
About the authors
V. A. Pavlenko
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: pavlenko.vasily@gmail.com
Russia, 123242, Moscow
O. V. Pavlenko
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: olga@ifz.ru
Russia, 123242, Moscow
References
- Гусев А.А., Мельникова В.Н. Связи между магнитудами – среднемировые и для Камчатки // Вулканология и сейсмология. 1990. № 6. С. 55–63.
- Гусев А.А, Гусева Е.М. Свойства колебаний грунта при сильных землетрясениях Камчатки (ОБЗОР) // Вулканология и сейсмология. 2006. № 4. С. 14–24.
- Гусев А.А., Петухин А.Г., Гусева Е.М., Гордеев Е.И., Чебров В.Н. Средние спектры Фурье сильных движений грунта при землетрясениях Камчатки // Вулканология и сейсмология. 2006. № 5. С. 60–70
- Гусев А.Аю, Гусева Е.М. Характер масштабирования очаговых спектров для землетрясений Камчатки в диапазоне магнитуд 3.5–6.5 //Докл. РАН. 2017. Т. 472. № 5. С. 580–583. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869565217050164
- Мельникова В.И., Гилёва Н.А., Радзиминович Я.Б., Середкина А.И. Култукское землетрясение 27 августа 2008 г. с MW = 6.3, I0 = 8–9 (Южный Байкал). Землетрясения Северной Евразии. 2008 год. Обнинск: ГС РАН. 2014. С. 386–407.
- Павленко О.В., Тубанов Ц.А. Характеристики излучения и распространения сейсмических волн в Байкальской рифтовой зоне, оцененные моделированием акселерограмм зарегистрированных землетрясений // Физика Земли. 2017. № 1. С. 20–33.
- Павленко О.В. Записи местных землетрясений как основа для корректных оценок сейсмических воздействий (на примере трассы второго Северомуйского тоннеля) // Геология и геофизика. 2022. № 2. С. 247–263. https://doi.org/10.15372/GiG2020203
- Суворов В.Д., Мишенькина З.Р., Петрик Г.В., Шелудько И.Ф. Земная кора и ее изостатическое состояние в Байкальской рифтовой зоне и прилегающих территориях по данным ДСС // Геология и геофизика. 1999. № 40. С. 303–316.
- Уломов В.И. Заключение эксперта В.И. Уломова, доктора физико-математических наук, профессора геофизики, члена экспертной комиссии Государственной экологической экспертизы материалов по обоснованию строительства “Трубопроводной системы первого пускового комплекса Восточная Сибирь–Тихий океан (ВСТО)” /ТЭО (проект)/по оценке сейсмической опасности О сейсмической опасности участка трассы нефтепровода ВСТО "Тайшет-Сковородино”. 2005. http://seismos-u.ifz.ru/personal/control.htm
- Abrahamson N.A., Silva W.J., Kamai R. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions // Earthquake Spectra. 2014. V. 30. № 3. P. 1025–1055.
- Abubakirov I.R., Gusev A.A. Estimation of scattering properties of lithosphere of Kamchatka based on Monte-Carlo simulation of record envelope of a near earthquake // Phys Earth Planet Inter. 1990. V. 64. P. 52–67.
- Akkar S., Bommer J.J. Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East // Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2007. V. 36. P. 1275–1301.
- Boore D.M., Joyner W.B. Site amplifications for Generic Rock Sites // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1997. V. 87. P. 327–341.
- Boore D.M. Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method // Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2003. V. 160. P. 635–676.
- Boore D.M., Atkinson G.M. Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s // Earthquake Spectra. 2008. V. 24. № 1. P. 99–138.
- Boore D.M. Ground-motion models for very-hard-rock sites in eastern North America: An update // Seismological Research Letters. 2018. V. 89. № 3. P. 1172–1184.
- Budnitz R.J., Apostolakis G., Boore D.M., Cluff L.S., Coppersmith K.J., Cornell C.A., Morris P.A. Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-6372. 1997.
- Campbell K.W., Bozorgnia Y. NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s // Earthquake Spectra. 2008. V. 24. № 1. P. 139–171.
- Cauzzi C., Faccioli E. Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records // J. Seismology. 2008. V. 12. P. 453–475.
- Chiou B.S.-J., Youngs R.R. An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra // Earthquake Spectra. 2008. V. 24. № 1. P. 173–215.
- Douglas J. Ground-motion prediction equations 1964–2010. Final Rept. RP-59356-FR, Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres (BRGM), Orleans, France. 2011. 444 p.
- Douglas J. Ground motion prediction equations 1964-2017. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Strathclyde. 2017. http://www.gmpe.org.uk/gmpereport2014.pdf
- Graizer V. Ground-motion prediction equations for central and eastern North America // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2016. V. 106. № 4. P. 1600–1612.
- Hanks T.C., McGuire R.K. The character of high frequency strong ground motion // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1981. V. 71. P. 2071–2095.
- Joyner W.B., Boore D.M. Methods of regression analysis of strong motion data // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1993. V. 83. № 2. P. 469–487.
- Konovalov A.V., Manaychev K.A., Stepnov A.A., Gavrilov A.V. Regional ground motion prediction equation for Sakhalin island // Seismic Instruments. 2019. V. 55. № 1. P. 70–77.
- Pavlenko O.V. Simulation of Ground Motion from Strong Earthquakes of Kamchatka Region (1992–1993) at Rock and Soil Sites // Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2013. V. 170. № 4. P. 571–595.
- Zhao J.X., Liang X., Jiang F., Xing H., Zhu M., Hou R., Zhang Y., Lan X., Rhoades D.A., Irikura K., Fukushima Y., Somerville P.G. Ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes in Japan using site class and simple geometric attenuation functions // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2016. V. 106. № 4. P. 1518–1534.
Supplementary files
