Deep Structure of the Anapa Flexural–Rupture Zone, Western Caucasus
- Authors: Rogozhin E.A.1,2, Gorbatikov A.V.1, Kharazova Y.V.1, Stepanova M.Y.1, Chen J.3, Ovsyuchenko A.N.1, Lar’kov A.S.1, Sysolin A.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Federal Research Center, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics
- Issue: Vol 53, No 5 (2019)
- Pages: 541-547
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0016-8521/article/view/156844
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852119050030
- ID: 156844
Cite item
Abstract
In the period from 2007 to 2017 complex geological and geophysical studies were carried out in the three largest flexural-rupture fault zones in the North-West Caucasus (Anapa, Akhtyrka, and Moldavansky). The microseismic sounding (MSM) was used as the main geophysical method. Studies with the help of MSM allowed us to identify the features of the deep structure of the earth's crust in the study area and to associate them with specific tectonic structures on the surface.The binding was carried out by harmonizing the results of the MSM and the parameters of the section of the sedimentary cover and crustal boundaries according to the drilling data and the work previously performed by the earthquake converted wave method (ECWM). It was found that the Anapa flexure and longitudinal tectonic zones have clear deep roots, and also separate the pericline of the North-Western Caucasus from the Taman Peninsula and from the lowered blocks of the Northern slope of the folded system.Faults in the study area are divided into: (1) deep faults of the Caucasian stretch, penetrating into the lower crust and even to the upper mantle, and (2) near-surface faults, do not extend to the depths beyond the thickness of the sedimentary cover. The seismogenic role of these tectonic disturbances in the studied seismically active region has been determined.
About the authors
E. A. Rogozhin
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences; Federal Research Center, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123242; Obninsk, 249035
A. V. Gorbatikov
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123242
Yu. V. Kharazova
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123242
M. Yu. Stepanova
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123242
J. Chen
Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
China, Beijing, 100029
A. N. Ovsyuchenko
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123242
A. S. Lar’kov
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123242
A. I. Sysolin
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eurog@ifz.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123242
Supplementary files
