


Vol 52, No 6 (2018)
- Year: 2018
- Articles: 6
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0016-8521/issue/view/9516
Article
Structure of the Laptev Sea Shelf–Eurasian Basin Transition Zone (Arctic Ocean)
Abstract
Based on obtained data, the paper considers the structure of the sedimentary cover and basement in the continent–ocean transition zone. We analyze the structure of modern tectonic activity zones in the Laptev Sea and structurally similar zones in the Novosibirsk Trough and the De Long Massif. Three sedimentary Anisin–Laptev, Amundsen, and West Laptev basins separated by basement uplifts are distinguished in sedimentary cover. The Anisin–Laptev Basin is separated from the West Laptev Basin by the North Laptev Horst and from the Amundsen Basin by an uplift stretching from the Lomonosov Ridge and covered by the Neogene–Quaternary deposits. The modern tectonic activity zone, marked by a rift valley and earthquakes, stretches across the continental slope from the Gakkel Ridge above a sedimentary rock sequence possessing many-kilometers thickness. The zone reached its present-day position in the Pliocene. Near the shelf boundary, the zone bifurcates, with one branch departing into the West Laptev Basin, and the other branch departing into grabens that developed to the west of New Siberian Islands forming the Laptev microplate.



Structural Evolution of the Elikanskiy Granite–Gneiss Swell (Western Transbaikalia)
Abstract
The Elikanskiy granite–gneiss swell represents a structure, similar to Late Mesozoic Cordilleran-type metamorphic core complexes allocated within the Eravninskiy terrane of the Yenisei-Transbaikal tectonic collage, the Mongolo-Okhotskiy orogenic belt and a northern part of the Argun–Idermeg superterrane of the Central Asian orogenic belt. The main elements of a geological structure of the Elikanskiy metamorphic core complex are the detachment zone, core and upper nappe. The detachment zone separating a core from the upper nappe is represented by a thick zone of blastomylonites and a zone of chlorite breccias. That zone was formed under the conditions of tangential stress and led to the exhumation and structural and metamorphic transformations of magmatic rocks of the Bukhtochinskiy Complex and metamorphic rocks of the Upper Olekma Complex, which compose the core of the considered structure. The upper nappe consists of Jurassic and Cretaceous stratified rocks of the Kyker–Akimin and Usuglinskiy basin and the Early Paleozoic–Mesozoic volcanoplutonic complexes in its southeastern framing. The Elikanskiy metamorphic core complex is a part of a huge belt of metamorphic core complexes which is traced along the northern border of the Mongolo-Okhotskiy orogenic belt on distance about 2000 km. The formation of the Elikanskiy metamorphic core complex as well as other similar complexes in the eastern part of the Central Asian orogenic belt is connected with collapse of the Late Mesozoic orogen which has resulted from the accretionary and collision events connected with closing of the Mongolo-Okhotskiy paleoocean basin and respectively formation of the Mongolo-Okhotskiy orogenic belt.



Seismotectonic Activation of Modern Structures of the Siberian Craton
Abstract
Our research of the modern structures of Siberian Craton aims to reveal regional regularities in the seismotectonic destruction of the Earth’s crust and to clarify the dynamics of the formation of the focal zones of strong earthquakes. Analysis of activated structures and marginal suture zones located in the study area was based on structural and geophysical data, the modern structural plan, and the quantitative characteristics of modern and recent tectonic movements, active faults, and tectonic stress fields identified by tectonophysical analysis of deformation and seismological parameters. Unambiguous correlation between the seismic activity level of modern structures and the rates of modern and recent tectonic movements were not determined in our study. The most active structures of the Siberian Craton located in zones of the dynamic influence of marginal sutures are contrasted against the gradient field of modern vertical tectonic movements and characterized by the mosaic field of the mean and low rates of modern movements. The kinematics of seismotectonic deformation and levels of seismic activation of suture zones of the Siberian Craton are governed by global geodynamic processes taking place at the boundaries between the Eurasian, North American and Amur lithospheric plates. The activated structures in the northern regions of Siberian platform, which are characterized by the highest rates of modern movements, are heterogeneous. Both fluid processes and glacioisostatic movements may have influenced the dynamics of the formation of these high-gradient deformation zones. In seismotectonic studies aimed at determining levels of the potential seismic hazard of modern structures, we find it important to take into account errors in geodetic data and ensure more correct reference to the rates of tectonic movements at the neotectonic stage. In order to correctly assess the degree of geodynamic activity of modern structures, special consideration should be given to the fluid-geodynamic factor that controls most geodynamic processes, including tectonic stress accumulation, the formation of earthquake focal zones, and the intensity of seismic events.



Constraining Age of Deformation Stages in the South-Western Part of Verkhoyansk Fold-and-Thrust Belt by Apatite and Zircon Fission-Track Analysis
Abstract
Abstract—Zircon fission track analysis was carried out for Mesoproterozoic to Lower Paleozoic sedimentary rocks of the South-Verkhoyansk sector of the Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt. The age of thrusting stages was constrained in this region. The early stage of deformations dated as 160 Ma, the main stage dated as from 70 to 90 Ma. Thermal history modeling on apatite allowed us to establish the youngest stage of erosion from 20 to 30 Ma, which indirectly indicates the reactivation of tectonic processes in the region at the boundary of Paleogene and Neogene. The degree of heating of the rocks increases in the east direction, and if in the frontal zone the fission tracks were annealed only in apatite, then in the Sette-Daban zone fission tracks were annealed both in apatite and in zircon.



Deep Structure, Volcanic and Seismic Activity Regime in Elbrus Region
Abstract
According to obtained results of profiling by microseismic sounding method along the line in submeridional direction crossing the eastern cone of the Elbrus volcano and a magmatic chamber was found under the Elbrus volcano in the range of depths of 7‒13 km below sea level with horizontal size of ≈ 7 km. At the depths of 18‒40 km, a narrow linear magmatic focus steeply dipping in the southern direction is deduced, its horizontal size in the cross section is ≈5 km underlain by another magmatic focus at the depths of 45‒55 km, penetrating the upper mantle. The found magmatic chamber and earthquake center in the crust section are formed by isometric and linear low-velocity bodies. The sections of two profiles show deep faults correlated with morphological features revealed on the surface. To the south of Tyrnyauz town at the depths of 17‒40 km below sea level, a low-speed steeply sinking in the northern direction linear body was found and interpreted as cool volcanic channel approximately at the size of Elbrus. Having carried out geophysical research we obtained data on 7 ancient earthquakes with magnitude M = 6.5‒7.0 occurred over past 7000 years in the vicinity of the volcano. In that historic period five strong eruptions of Elbrus volcano had happened. We settled the absence of time commonality in activations of volcanism and seismicity. Currently Elbrus volcano is in a phase of deep seismic abate. In 2004‒2017 we have fulfilled geological, geophysical and paleoseismological research that confirms Elbrus is not completely extinct volcano.



Chronicle
In Memory of Outstanding Geologist Professor He Gouqi (Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China)
Abstract
Abstract—We briefly review the geological research of Professor He Gouqi (1956‒2017), renowned geologist of Peking University in China, author of more than 200 publications, who directed or was responsible for the execution of several major regional projects in China, such as Upper Mantle of the Earth’s Crust of Northern China, Project for Mineral Resource Prospecting in Xinjiang, Formation and Evolution of the Paleozoic Lithosphere in Northern Xinjiang and Neighboring Regions of China, Study of the Relationship between the Cover Structure and Mineral Resources of the Western Tien Shan, and Structure and Evolution of the Earth’s Crust of Xinjiang. We shed light on the importance of Professor He Gouqi’s geological research in Russia, as well as his international scientific and close friendly ties with lecturers and professors at the Geological Faculty of Moscow State University.


