Effect of the Modifier on the Catalytic Properties and Thermal Stability of Ru–Cs(Ba)/Sibunit Catalyst for Ammonia Decomposition
- Authors: Borisov V.A.1, Iost K.N.1, Petrunin D.A.2, Temerev V.L.1, Muromtsev I.V.1, Arbuzov A.B.1, Trenikhin M.V.1, Gulyaeva T.I.1, Smirnova N.S.3, Shlyapin D.A.1, Tsyrul’nikov P.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Omsk State Technical University
- Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 60, No 3 (2019)
- Pages: 372-379
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0023-1584/article/view/164262
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023158419030029
- ID: 164262
Cite item
Abstract
Based on the Sibunit carbon composite, Ru–Cs(Ba)/Sibunit catalysts with Cs(Ba) : Ru molar ratios of 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 were obtained. The catalytic activity of the obtained promoted catalysts in the decomposition of ammonia and their thermal resistance to methanation are compared. In the reaction of ammonia decomposition, the specific activity (Wsp) of barium-containing catalysts proved to be 2 times lower than the specific activity of cesium-containing samples with the same molar M : Ru ratio. Thus, Wsp at 500°С was 29.4 mmol H2 min–1 for 0.5Cs–Ru/Sibunit and 15.4 mmol H2 g–1cat min–1 for 0.5Ba–Ru/Sibunit. It was shown that the introduction of barium at molar ratios Ba : Ru = of 0.5–2.5 significantly increases the thermal stability of the samples defined as the ratio of the weight of hydrogen obtained on the catalyst to the weight of carbon subjected to methanation. There is 52 g H2 for nonpromoted Ru/Sibunit catalyst, 370 g H2 for the 0.5Ba–Ru/Sibunit sample, 200 g H2 for the 1.5Ba–Ru/Sibunit sample, and 150 g H2 for the 2.5Ba–Ru/Sibunit sample per 1 g of carbon loss.
About the authors
V. A. Borisov
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
K. N. Iost
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
D. A. Petrunin
Omsk State Technical University
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644050
V. L. Temerev
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
I. V. Muromtsev
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
A. B. Arbuzov
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
M. V. Trenikhin
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
T. I. Gulyaeva
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
N. S. Smirnova
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
D. A. Shlyapin
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
P. G. Tsyrul’nikov
Institute of Hydrocarbons Processing, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: borisovtiger86@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Omsk, 644040
Supplementary files
