Ceramics of the Cs2O–Al2O3 System Prepared by Solid-Phase Technology and the Glycine–Nitrate Combustion Process

A. V. Fedorova; Федорова А. В.; V. A. Stolyarov; Столяров В. А.; M. E. Pavelina; Павелина М. Е.; P. D. Kolonitskii; Колоницкий П. Д.; S. O. Kirichenko; Кириченко С. О.; A. V. Timchuk; Тимчук А. В.; V. L. Stolyarova; Столярова В. Л.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X23600275

Ceramics of the Cs2O–Al2O3 System Prepared by Solid-Phase Technology and the Glycine–Nitrate Combustion Process

Authors: Fedorova A.V.¹, Stolyarov V.A.¹, Pavelina M.E.¹, Kolonitskii P.D.¹, Kirichenko S.O.¹, Timchuk A.V.², Stolyarova V.L.¹
Affiliations:
1. St. Petersburg State University
2. St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University “LETI” named after V.I. Ul’yanov (Lenin)
Issue: Vol 68, No 7 (2023)
Pages: 975-987
Section: НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ И НАНОМАТЕРИАЛЫ
URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0044-457X/article/view/136378
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600275
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RIKGEI
ID: 136378

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Cs2O–Al2O3 ceramic samples containing 20 and 33 mol % cesium oxide were prepared by сeramic technique and by the glycine–nitrate combustion process. The prepared samples were identified and characterized by X-ray powder diffraction and X-ray fluorescence analyses, scanning electron microscopy, and differential thermal analysis. X-ray powder diffraction and scanning electron microscopy showed that the phase composition and surface of the samples change significantly and nonmonotonically depending on the synthetic method used and the heat treatment parameters of the batch. Optimal synthetic conditions and heat treatment parameters for preparing Cs2O–Al2O3 samples were elucidated.

References

Prins R. // J. Catal. 2020. V. 392. P. 336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.10.010
Busca G. // Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019. V. 104. P. 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.04.003
Meephoka C., Chaisuk C., Samparnpiboon P., Praserthdam P. // Catal. Commun. 2008. V. 9. P. 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11060690
Shreyas P.S., Mahesh B.P., Rajanna S., Rajesh N. // Mat. Tood. Proc. 2021. V. 45. P. 429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1012
Подзорова Л.И., Ильичёва А.А., Пенькова О.И. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2019. Т. 55. С. 671. https://doi.org/0.1134/S0002337X19060125
Chaitree W., Jiemsirilers S., Mekasuwandumrong O. et al. // Catal. Today. 2011. V. 164. P. 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.004
Tsybulya S.V., Kryukova G.N. // Phys. Rev. B. 2008. V. 77. P. 024112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.024112
Paglia G., Buckley C.E., Rohl A.L. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2003. V. 68. P. 144110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.144110
Rudolph M., Motylenko M., Rafaja D. // IUCrJ. 2019. V. 6. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252518015786
Marí B., Singh K.C., Moya M. et al. // Opt. Quant. Electr. 2015. V. 47. P. 1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-014-9997-9
Saeed Adel M.N., Al-Gunaid Murad Q.A., Subramani N.K. et al. // Pol.-Plast. Tech. Eng. 2018. V. 57. P. 1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2017.1373402
McMillan P.F., Grzechnik A., Chotalla H. // J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1998. V. 226. № 3. P. 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00416-5
Fukumi K., Sakka S., Kokubo T. // J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1987. V. 93. P. 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(87)80038-8
Macleod N., Keel J.M., Lambert R.M. // Catal. Lett. 2003. V. 86. P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022602807322
Ansari A.A., Khan M.A.M., Khan M.N., Alrokayan S.A. // J. Semicond. 2011. V. 32. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/32/4/043001
Guéneau C., Flèche J.L. // Calphad. 2015. V. 49. P. 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2015.02.002
Stolyarova V.L., Vorozhtcov V.A., Lopatin S.I. et al. // Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2021. V. 35. P. e9079. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9079
Stolyarova V.L., Vorozhtcov V.A., Lopatin S.I. et al. // Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2021. V. 35. P. e9097. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9097
Каймиева О.С., Сабирова И.Э., Буянова Е.С., Петрова С.А. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 9. С. 1211. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22090057
Медведева А.Е., Махонина Е.В., Печень Л.С. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 7. С. 896. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22070157
Babaev E.V. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2010. V. 80. P. 2590. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363210120261
O’Donnell M.J., Zhou C., Scott W.L. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996. V. 118. P. 6070. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9601245
Симоненко Т.Л., Симоненко Н.П., Симоненко Е.П., Кузнецов Н.Т. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 10. С. 1359. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22600736
Томилин О.Б., Мурюмин Е.Е., Фадин М.В., Щипакин С.Ю. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 4. С. 457. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22040195
Wang J., Zhao H., Wen Y. // Electrochim. Acta. 2013. V. 113. P. 679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.086
Журавлев В.Д., Васильев В Г., Владимирова Е.В. и др. // Физ. хим. стекла. 2010. Т. 36. № 4. С. 632. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659610040164
Cardarelli F. Materials handbook. London: Springer-Verlag, 2008. P. 600.
Zhou R.-S., Snyder R. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 1991. V. 47. P. 617. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768191002719
Langlet G. // C. R. Acad. Sci. 1964. V. 259. P. 3769.