Some Peculiarities in Application of Denaturating and Non-Denaturating In Situ Hybridization on Chromosomes of Cereals
- Authors: Kuznetsova V.M.1,2, Razumova O.V.1,3, Karlov G.I.1,2, Dang T.X.2, Kroupin P.Y.1,2, Divashuk M.G.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Crop Breeding, All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology
- Center for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University (MTAA)
- Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 74, No 2 (2019)
- Pages: 75-80
- Section: Research Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0096-3925/article/view/173801
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392519020056
- ID: 173801
Cite item
Abstract
Non-denaturing fluorescent in situ hybridization (ND FISH) is a convenient method of cytogenetic research. Compared to the standard method, ND FISH is fast and easy to perform and requires less time, reagents, and tools. Thus, it is gaining increasing popularity among different groups of scientists and is used to accomplish various scientific tasks. However, when using this method to visualize the chromosomes of wheat and its wild relatives, we faced some peculiarities of its application when oligonucleotide probes are used. In this paper, we compare the three following methods: two different versions of denaturating and non-denaturating FISH. In the standard procedure and its modifications, chromosomes are treated with formamide at high temperature that results in the denaturation of supercoiled DNA of plant chromosomes. In the non-denaturing FISH, this step is omitted, which makes it possible to keep the native chromosome structure and, thus, is more time and cost effective. In our work, all methods demonstrated their efficiency. Non-denaturing FISH is characterized by ease and convenience but less reproducibility in a series of experiments. The standard protocol and its modifications are most stable and reliable, but negatively affect chromosome morphology. In successive hybridizations on the same slide (sequential FISH), we recommend a combination of these methods, with primary testing using a standard protocol and subsequent hybridization using the ND-FISH method.
About the authors
V. M. Kuznetsova
Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Crop Breeding, All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology; Center for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University (MTAA)
Email: divashuk@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 127550; Moscow, 127550
O. V. Razumova
Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Crop Breeding, All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology; Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: divashuk@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 127550; Moscow, 127276
G. I. Karlov
Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Crop Breeding, All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology; Center for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University (MTAA)
Email: divashuk@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 127550; Moscow, 127550
T. X. Dang
Center for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University (MTAA)
Email: divashuk@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 127550
P. Yu. Kroupin
Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Crop Breeding, All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology; Center for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University (MTAA)
Email: divashuk@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 127550; Moscow, 127550
M. G. Divashuk
Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Crop Breeding, All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology; Center for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University (MTAA)
Author for correspondence.
Email: divashuk@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 127550; Moscow, 127550
Supplementary files
