Investigation of Characteristics of a Motor-Imagery Brain–Computer Interface with Quick-Response Tactile Feedback
- Authors: Lukoyanov M.V.1,2, Gordleeva S.Y.1, Grigorev N.A.1, Savosenkov A.O.1, Lotareva Y.A.1, Pimashkin A.S.1, Kaplan A.Y.1,3
-
Affiliations:
- Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
- Privolzhskiy Research Medical University
- Department of Biology
- Issue: Vol 73, No 4 (2018)
- Pages: 222-228
- Section: Physiology
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0096-3925/article/view/173959
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392518040053
- ID: 173959
Cite item
Abstract
One of the approaches in rehabilitation after a stroke is mental training by representation of movement using a brain-computer interface (BCI), which allows one to control the result of every attempt of imaginary movement. BCI technology is based on online analysis of an electroencephalogram (EEG), detecting moments of imaginary movement representation (reaction of sensorimotor rhythm desynchronization) and presenting these events in the form of changing scenes on a computer screen or triggering electro-mechanical devices, which essentially is feedback. Traditionally used visual feedback is not always optimal for poststroke patients. Earlier, the effectiveness of tactile feedback, triggered only after a long-time mental representation of the movement, for several seconds or more, was studied. In this work, the efficiency of quick tactile feedback with motor-imagery-based BCI was investigated during classification of short (0.5 s) EEG segments. It was shown that quick tactile feedback is not inferior to the visual feedback and that it is possible to create BCI with tactile feedback that allows a quick reward of physiologically effective attempts of motor imagery and operates with acceptable accuracy for practical use. Furthermore, under certain conditions, tactile feedback can lead to a greater degree of sensorimotor rhythm desynchronization in subjects in comparison with the visual feedback, which can serve as a basis for constructing an effective neurointerface training system.
About the authors
M. V. Lukoyanov
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; Privolzhskiy Research Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: lukoyanovm@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950; Nizhny Novgorod, 603005
S. Y. Gordleeva
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Email: lukoyanovm@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950
N. A. Grigorev
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Email: lukoyanovm@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950
A. O. Savosenkov
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Email: lukoyanovm@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950
Y. A. Lotareva
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Email: lukoyanovm@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950
A. S. Pimashkin
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Email: lukoyanovm@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950
A. Y. Kaplan
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; Department of Biology
Email: lukoyanovm@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950; Moscow, 119234
Supplementary files
