The diffusion of the social structure of modern capitalism as a reflection of the post-capitalist tendencies formation
- 作者: Kolganov A.I.1
-
隶属关系:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- 期: 编号 3 (2025)
- 页面: 132-144
- 栏目: DISCISSION. POLEMICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0132-1625/article/view/281094
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162525030119
- ID: 281094
详细
The processes of erosion (diffusion) of the social structure of late capitalism are considered in the article as symptoms of the post-capitalist tendencies development. The structure of the main classes of capitalist society is undergoing various structural shifts. There is a fragmentation of the main classes into increasingly narrow socio-professional groups. At the same time, there is an intertwining of different class characteristics within the same socio-professional group, as well as the performance of different socio-class functions by the same persons. There are also emerging trends that affect many socio-professional groups, giving them certain common properties. In this sense, the formation of the precariat is characteristic is based on the acquisition by representatives of various socio-professional groups of such a common property as instability of employment and income. But the most fundamental shifts in the social structure and in the social position of various social strata of capitalist society are associated with the increasing role of creative activity. This trend is brought to life by the spread of modern sophisticated technologies, the growing knowledge of the intensity of production, and the need for capital to maintain a high intensity of innovation processes. Such shifts lead to the formation of contradictions between the conditions of a person’s self-realization in creative activity and those narrow limits in which this activity is subordinated to the interests of self-growth of capital. At the same time, a significant part of a person’s creative potential is used within the framework of the so-called “useless sector” – a significant part of what is called “creative industries” is focused not on the goals of human development, but on manipulating market and consumer behavior in order to get more effectively appropriate profits.
作者简介
Andrey Kolganov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: onaglo@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2223-7538
SPIN 代码: 7231-9030
Scopus 作者 ID: 36620265400
Researcher ID: D-5827-2013
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Laboratory for Comparative Research of Socio-Economic Systems, Faculty of Economics
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Anisimov R. I. (2022) Working Hours and Social Guarantees of Precariums (Comparative Analysis Experience). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 100–111. (In Russ.)
- Bauman Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity, Blackwell.
- Bauman Z. (2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity, Blackwell.
- Beck U. (1986) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Franklfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (In German)
- Bell D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture of Social Forecasting. N.Y.: Basic Books.
- Berle A. A., Means G. C. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. N.Y.: The Macmillan Company.
- Bodrunov S. D. (2018) Noonomy. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya. (In Russ.)
- Brabham D. C. (2013) Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.
- Burnham J. (1941) Managerial Revolution. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.
- Buzgalin A. V. (2015) Objectification, Reification and Alienation: Relevance of Abstract Philosophical Discussions. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. No. 5: 124–130. (In Russ.)
- Buzgalin A. V. (2017) Creative Economy: Private Intellectual Property or Everyone’s Ownership of Everything? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 43–53. (In Russ.)
- Buzgalin A. V. (2023) Creative [Post]Economics: from Sociophilosophical to Political Economy Understanding. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. No. 6: 45–56. (In Russ.)
- Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2019) Social Structure Transformation of Late Capitalism: from Proletariat and Bourgeoisie towards Precariat and Creative Class? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 18–28. (In Russ.)
- Chase S. (1932) A New Deal. N.Y.: The Macmillan company.
- Estellés-Arolas E., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara F. (2012) Towards an Integrated Crowdsourcing Definition. Journal of Information Science. No. 38 (2): 189–200.
- Financial Investors: Saviours or Robber Barons. New Challenges by the International Capital Markets. (2007) Ed. by J. Huffschmid, M. Köppen, W. Rhode. Hamburg: VSA. (In German.)
- Florida R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
- Galbraith J. K. (1969) The New Industrial State. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
- Gershman M. A., Demyanova A. V., Polyakova E. Y. (2023) Creative class of Russia: portrait in numbers. Higher School of Economics. The Center for Interdisciplinary Research of Human Potential. Scientific digest. Special edition. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2023/01/09/2039229413/Human_Capital_NCMU_Digest_Special_Issue%202_Russia_Creative_Class_01–2023.pdf. (In Russ.)
- The Global Dispossession Economy. (2004) Ed. by C. Zeller. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot. (In German)
- Howkins J. (2001) The Creative Economy. How People Make Money from Ideas. L. and N.Y.: Penguin Press.
- Huffschmid J. (2002) Political economy of financial markets. Hamburg: VSA. (In German)
- Kalleberg A. L. (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s-2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Kolganov A. I. (2024) The Importance of Human Potential as a Factor and Criterion of Socio-Economic Development. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [The economic science of modern Russia]. No. 3 (106): 7–23. (In Russ.)
- Kondrashov P. N. (2021) From the Market Society to the Rent Society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 157–163. (In Russ.)
- Krätke S. (2010) ‘Creative Cities’ and the Rise of the Dealer Class: A Critique of Richard Florida’s Approach to Urban Theory. Journal of Urban and Regional Research. No. 34(4): 835–853.
- Marx K. (1961) Capital. Vol. III. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2 ed. Vol. 25 (I). Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russ.)
- Marx K. (1969) Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1859. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2 ed. Vol 46 (II). Moscow: IPL. (In Russ.)
- Martianov V. S. (2017) Our Rental Future: Global Contours of a society without labor? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 141–153. (In Russ.)
- Rashin A. G. (1956) The Population of Russia for 100 years (1813–1913). Statistical essays. Ed. by S. G. Strumilin. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe statisticheskoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russ.)
- Shaw-Taylor L. (2009) The Occupational Structure of England and Wales, c.1750–1911. Paper prepared for the INCHOS workshop held in Cambridge July 29th-31st. The Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure. URL: https://www.campop.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/occupations/britain19c/papers/paper5.pdf (assessed 21.02.2025).
- Shcherbakova E. M. (2020) Health protection costs in OECD countries, 2019. Demoskop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly]. No. 859–860, May 18–31. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2020/0859/barom02.php (assesed 29.09.2023). (In Russ.)
- Standing G. (2011) The Precariat: the New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Toshchenko J. T. (2015) The Precariat is a New Social Class. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 3–13. (In Russ.)
- Veblen T. (2001) The Engineers and the Price System [1921]. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
- Voronin G. L., Kramer A. D. (2023) The Precariat: a Sociological Analysis of a New Social Phenomenon. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Lobachevsky University. Series: Social Sciences]. No. 4 (72): 111–121. (In Russ.)
