Imitation of the Explosion Effects in a Shock Tube with a Focusing Element

S. P. Medvedev; Медведев С. П.; S. V. Khomik; Хомик С. В.; O. G. Maximova; Максимова О. Г.; E. K. Anderzhanov; Андержанов Э. К.; A. N. Ivantsov; Иванцов А. Н.; V. N.  Mikhalkin; Михалкин В. Н.; A. M. Tereza; Тереза А. М.

doi:10.31857/S0207401X23080083

Imitation of the Explosion Effects in a Shock Tube with a Focusing Element

作者: Medvedev S.P.¹, Khomik S.V.¹, Maximova O.G.¹, Anderzhanov E.K.¹, Ivantsov A.N.¹, Mikhalkin V.N.¹^,2, Tereza A.M.¹
隶属关系:
1. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Academy of the State Fire Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia
期: 卷 42, 编号 8 (2023)
页面: 56-60
栏目: Combustion, explosion and shock waves
URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0207-401X/article/view/139942
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23080083
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IGUOVO
ID: 139942

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

The results of the experiments performed in a cylindrical shock tube (ST) equipped with a focusing element in the form of a truncated cone at the end are analyzed. It is found that the maximum pressure at the top of the cone is greater by several factors than the pressure when the shock wave is reflected from a flat wall. Close agreement is obtained between the measured pressure profiles and the results of numerical simulation of shock wave focusing using the GasDynamicsTool (GDT) package in a three-dimensional formulation. It is shown that the dependence of pressure on time during focusing is similar to that observed in the case of a normal reflection of a shock wave generated by an explosion of a trinitrotoluene (TNT) charge. The results obtained and the developed technique make it possible to imitate the high-explosive action of an explosion without the use of condensed explosives.

关键词

imitation, explosion action, shock wave, shock tube, focusing, numerical simulation

参考

Борисов А.А., Гельфанд Б.Е., Фролов С.М., Поленов А.Н., Цыганов С.А. // Физика горения и взрыва. 1986. № 4. С. 33.
Медведев С.П., Иванцов А.Н., Михайлин А.И., Сильников М.В., Тереза А.М., Хомик С.В. // Хим. физика. 2020. Т. 39. № 8. С. 3.
Хомик С.В., Гук И.В., Иванцов А.Н. и др. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 8. С. 63.
Хомик С.В., Иванцов А.Н., Медведев С.П. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 8. С. 88.
Медведев С.П., Иванцов А.Н., Андержанов Э.К., Тереза А.М., Хомик С.В., Черепанова Т.Т. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 12. С. 56.
Михалкин В.Н., Сумской С.И., Тереза А.М., Трошин К.Я., Хасаинов Б.А., Фролов С.М. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 8. С. 3.
Сумской С.И., Софьин А.С., Зайнетдинов С.Х., Лисанов М.В., Агапов А.А. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 3. С. 63.
Герасимов Г.Я., Козлов П.В., Забелинский И.Е., Быкова Н.Г., Левашов В.Ю. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 8. С. 17.
Забелинский И.Е., Козлов П.В., Акимов Ю.В. и др. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 11. С. 22.
Борисов А.А., Гельфанд Б.Е., Заманский В.М. и др. // Хим. физика. 1988. Т. 7. № 10. С. 1387.
Gelfand B.E., Khomik S.V., Bartenev A.M. et al. // Shock Waves. 2000. V. 10. № 3. P. 197; https://doi.org/10.1007/s001930050007
Smirnov N.N., Penyazkov O.G., Sevrouk K.L. et al. // Acta Astronaut. 2017. V. 135. P. 114; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.014
Zibarov A.V. // ASME PVP. 1999. V. 397. № 1. P. 117.
Медведев С.П., Максимова О.Г., Черепанова Т.Т., Агафонов Г.Л., Андержанов Э.К., Тереза А.М., Хомик С.В. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 11. С. 73.
Kingery C.N., Bulmash G. Air blast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory: MD, Aberdeen Proving Ground. Tech. rep. ARBL-TR-02555, 1984.
Hyde D. Microcomputer Programs CONWEP and FUNPRO, Applications of TM 5-855-1, 'Fundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons’. Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers: MS, Vicksburg. Report AD-A 195 867, 1988.