Clinical and biological efficacy of microfluidic chips for sperm selection in infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technologies
- Authors: Makarova N.P.1, Sysoeva A.P.1, Chernyshev V.S.1, Lobanova N.N.1, Kulakova E.V.1, Kalinina E.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Issue: No 11 (2024)
- Pages: 138-145
- Section: Original Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0300-9092/article/view/279271
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.172
- ID: 279271
Cite item
Abstract
Relevance: In modern assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories, two primary methods are widely used to process ejaculates and isolate a fraction of morphologically normal motile sperm: density gradient centrifugation and the swim-up method. Both techniques involve high-speed centrifugation (300 g), which can negatively impact DNA integrity in male germ cells and promote the formation of reactive oxygen species, potentially reducing sperm fertilization capacity by causing DNA fragmentation. Microfluidic systems have attracted attention as a promising alternative for male germ cell selection in infertility treatment due to their ability to select sperm with enhanced reproductive potential.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of microfluidic chips for sperm selection in ART-based infertility treatment and analyze the morpho-functional characteristics of male gametes selected using microfluidics.
Materials and methods: This study included 94 married couples undergoing ART infertility treatment, divided into two groups: the study group (n=47), in which fertilization was performed using sperm isolated on microfluidic chips, and the control group (n=47), in which standard ejaculate sample preparation was conducted using density gradient centrifugation. The clinical and embryological outcomes were assessed. In the second phase, the ejaculate from men in the study group was divided into three samples: native (unprocessed) group, study group (processed using Fertile Plus microfluidic chips, Turkey), and control group (processed by density gradient centrifugation at 300 g per the manufacturer’s protocol, PanECO, Russia). Sperm concentration (C), progressive motility (PR%), morphology (N%), and chromatin maturity (%) were also assessed. Nuclear protein analysis (for chromatin maturity/condensation) was performed using aniline blue staining (Sperm Processor; India). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics (USA), and the Mann–Whitney U test was used to identify group differences. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: ART programs using microfluidic technology resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of high-quality blastocysts on culture days 5–6. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate, or early pregnancy loss (up to 12 weeks gestation). In the second phase, the biological assessment of male gametes indicated no differences in sperm concentration and motility among the groups. However, statistically significant differences were noted in the percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa (p<0.05): native – 2 (2; 3); microfluidic chip group – 3 (3; 4); and gradient centrifugation group – 3 (3; 3). Chromatin quality in the isolated spermatozoa also differed significantly: the percentage of immature spermatozoa was 14 (8; 20) in the native sample, 3 (5.5; 12) in the microfluidic chip group, and 8 (5; 10) in the gradient group, with a normal range of ≤15%.
Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest that microfluidic chips not only enhance the selection of morphologically normal spermatozoa but also increase the proportion of male germ cells with well-packed chromatin, which is a crucial factor for sustained pregnancies achieved through ART. Moreover, sperm selection without centrifugation using solely microfluidic devices (including passive ones) may improve embryological outcomes. Further studies are required to confirm the clinical effectiveness of this approach.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Natalya P. Makarova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: np_makarova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1396-7272
PhD, Leading Researcher at the Prof. B.V. Leonov Department for Assisted Technologies in Infertility Treatment
Russian Federation, MoscowAnastasia P. Sysoeva
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: a_sysoeva@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6502-4498
PhD, Clinical Embryologist at the Prof. B.V. Leonov Department for Assisted Technologies in Infertility Treatment
Russian Federation, MoscowVasily S. Chernyshev
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: v_chernyshev@oparina4.ru
PhD, Head of the Biophotonics Laboratory
Russian Federation, MoscowNatalia N. Lobanova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: n_lobanova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0818-4073
Clinical Embryologist at the Prof. B.V. Leonov Department for Assisted Technologies in Infertility Treatment
Russian Federation, MoscowElena V. Kulakova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: e_kulakova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4433-4163
Dr. Med. Sci., Senior Researcher at the Prof. B.V. Leonov Department for Assisted Technologies in Infertility Treatment
Russian Federation, MoscowElena A. Kalinina
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: e_kalinina@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8922-2878
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Prof. B.V. Leonov Department for Assisted Technologies in Infertility Treatment
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Назаренко Р.В., Здановский В.М. Методы селекции сперматозоидов для процедуры интрацитоплазматической инъекции сперматозоида в программах экстракорпорального оплодотворения (обзор литературы). Проблемы репродукции. 2019; 25(2): 83-9. [Nazarenko R.V., Zdanovskiĭ V.M. Sperm selection methods in IVF programs (literature review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2019; 25(2): 83-9. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/repro20192502183.
- Aydin S., Eflatun Deniz M. Utilization of a fertile chip in cases of male infertility. IVF Technologies and infertility - current practices and new perspectives. IntechOpen; 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.107108.
- Huang C.H., Chen C.H., Huang T.K., Lu F., Jen Huang J.Y., Li B.R. Design of a gradient-rheotaxis microfluidic chip for sorting of high-quality Sperm with progressive motility. iScience. 2023; 26(8): 107356. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.isci.2023.107356.
- Sheibak N., Amjadi F., Shamloo A., Zarei F., Zandieh Z. Microfluidic sperm sorting selects a subpopulation of high-quality sperm with a higher potential for fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 2024; 39(5): 902-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae045.
- Беляева Л.А., Шурыгина О.В., Тугушев М.Т., Миронов С.Ю. Опыт применения микрожидкостных чипов для сортировки спермы у пациентов с лечением бесплодия. Ульяновский медико-биологический журнал. 2024; 1: 82-90. [Belyaeva L.A., Shurygina O.V., Tugushev M.T., Mironov S.Yu. Using microfluidic sperm sorting chips in patients with infertility. Ulyanovsk Medico-Biological Journal. 2024; (1): 82-90. (in Russian)]. https:// dx.doi.org/10.34014/2227-1848-2024-1-82-90.
- Ma J., Xie Q., Zhang Y., Xiao Q., Liu X., Qiao C. et al. Advances in microfluidic technology for sperm screening and in vitro fertilization. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2024; 416(16): 3717-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-05120-9.
- Quinn M.M., Ribeiro S., Juarez-Hernandez F., Simbulan R.K., Jalalian L., Cedars M.I. et al. Microfluidic preparation of spermatozoa for ICSI produces similar embryo quality to density-gradient centrifugation: a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 2022; 37(7): 1406-13. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac099.
- Godiwala P., Kwieraga J., Almanza E., Neuber E., Grow D., Benadiva C. et al. The impact of microfluidics sperm processing on blastocyst euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation: a sibling oocyte double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial. Fertil. Steril. 2024; 122(1): 85-94. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.021.
- Banti M., Van Zyl E., Kafetzis D. Sperm preparation with microfluidic sperm sorting chip may improve intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes compared to density gradient centrifugation. Reprod. Sci. 2024; 31(6): 1695-704. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01483-1.
- Jahangiri A.R., Ziarati N., Dadkhah E., Bucak M.N., Rahimizadeh P., Shahverdi A. et al. Microfluidics: The future of sperm selection in assisted reproduction. Andrology. 2024; 12(6): 1236-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13578.
- Zeaei S., Zabetian Targhi M., Halvaei I., Nosrati R. High-DNA integrity sperm selection using rheotaxis and boundary following behavior in a microfluidic chip. Lab. Chip. 2023; 23(9): 2241-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ d2lc01190e.
- Гамидова П.С., Смольникова В.Ю., Макарова Н.П., Лобанова Н.Н. Методы улучшения исходов программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий путем инновационных подходов к селекции мужских половых клеток. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022; 7: 34-42. [Gamidova P.S., Smolnikova V.Yu., Makarova N.P., Lobanova N.N. Methods for improving the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs through innovative approaches to selecting male germ cells. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; (7): 34-42. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.7.34-42.
- Shukla S.K., Gaudriault P., Corbera A. Lab-on-chip (LoC) application for quality sperm selection: An undelivered promise? Open Res. Eur. 2023; 3:188. https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16671.1.
- Meseguer F., Giménez Rodríguez C., Rivera Egea R., Carrión Sisternas L., Remohí J.A., Meseguer M. Can microfluidics improve sperm quality? A prospective functional study. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(5): 1131. https:// dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12051131.
- Ma J., Xie Q., Zhang Y., Xiao Q., Liu X., Qiao C. et al. Advances in microfluidic technology for sperm screening and in vitro fertilization. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2024; 416(16): 3717-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-05120-9.
Supplementary files
