Switching processes in ferroactive solid solution 0.725NaNbO 3 –0.20KNbO 3 –0.075CdNb 2 O 6

M. O. Moysa; Мойса М. О.; M. V. Talanov; Таланов М. В.; K. P. Andryushin; Андрюшин К. П.; N. A. Shvetsova; Швецова Н. А.; I. A. Shvetsov; Швецов И. А.; A. N. Rybyanets; Рыбянец А. Н.

doi:10.31857/S0367676523702265

Switching processes in ferroactive solid solution 0.725NaNbO₃–0.20KNbO₃–0.075CdNb₂O₆

Авторлар: Moysa M.O.¹, Talanov M.V.¹, Andryushin K.P.¹, Shvetsova N.A.¹, Shvetsov I.A.¹, Rybyanets A.N.¹
Мекемелер:
1. Institute of Physics, Southern Federal University
Шығарылым: Том 87, № 9 (2023)
Беттер: 1285-1288
Бөлім: Articles
URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0367-6765/article/view/135485
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0367676523702265
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KBAEMI
ID: 135485

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық

Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық

Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация
Авторлар туралы
Әдебиет тізімі
Қосымша файлдар
Статистика

Аннотация

The results of dielectric hysteresis loops and dielectric permittivity studying of 0.725NaNbO₃–0.20KNbO₃–0.075CdNb₂O₆ ceramics in strong (5–40 kV · cm^–1) and weak (0–0.3 kV · cm^–1) alternating electric field are presented. The parameters of the reversible and irreversible contributions to the dielectric permittivity are determined. Based on the Preisach model, a diagram of the density of domain switching is constructed. It is shown that the distribution function of domains over local coercive fields is characterized by a sharp peak, which indicates a high degree of homogeneity of the domain structure.

Әдебиет тізімі

Zhang S., Xia R., Shrout T.R. et al. // Solid State Commun. 2007. V. 141. No. 12. P. 675.
Wei H., Wang H., Xia Y. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2018. V. 6. P. 12446.
Wu J.G. Advances in lead-free piezoelectric materials. Singapore: Springer, 2018.
Lee M.H., Kim D.J., Park J.S. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2015. V. 27. P. 6976.
Papanikolaou N.C., Hatzidaki E.G., Belivanis S. et al. // Med. Sci. Monitor. 2005. V. 11. No. 10. P. RA329.
Marcus D.K., Fulton J.J., Clarke E.J. // J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2010. V. 39. No. 2. P. 234.
Mason L.H., Harp J.P., Han D.Y // BioMed Res. Int. 2014. V. 2014. Art. No. 840547.
Coondoo I., Panwar N., Kholkin A. // J. Adv. Dielectr. 2013. V. 3. No. 2. Art. No. 1330002.
Kim J., Ji J.-H., Shin D.-J., Koh J.-H. // Ceram. Int. 2018. V. 44. No. 18. P. 22219.
Egerton L., Dillon D.M. et al. // J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 1959. V. 42. P. 438.
Moysa M.O., Andryushin K.P., Kubrin S.P. et al. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021. V. 1942. No. 117. Art. No. 012027.
Andryushin K., Shilkina L., Andryushina I. et al. // Materials. 2021. V. 14. No. 14. Art. No. 4009.
Турик А.В. // ФТТ. 1963. Т. 5. № 10. С. 2922.
Taylor D.V., Damjanovic D. // J. Appl. Phys. 1997. V. 82. P. 1973.
Cima L., Laboure E., Muralt P. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2002. V. 73. No. 10. P. 3546.
Fujii I., Hong E., Trolier-McKinstry S. // IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2010. V. 57. No. 8. P. 1717.
Tsuji K., Fan Z. Bang S., Dursun S. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022. V. 42. No. 1. P. 105.
Piazza D., Stoleriu L., Mitoseriu L. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006. V. 26. No. 14. P. 2959.