Making sense of Hegel’s dialectic: what kind of method is it?
- Авторлар: Maslov D.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Institute of Philosophy and Law, SB RAS
- Шығарылым: Том 33, № 2 (2023)
- Беттер: 103-141
- Бөлім: THE SCIENCE OF LOGIC AS METAPHYSICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0869-5377/article/view/291827
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2023-2-103-141
- ID: 291827
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
The paper presents an interpretation of a central Hegelian concept “dialectic” reading him as a post-Kantian critical thinker. We can speak of objective dialectic as processes in the world and subjective dialectic conceived of as a method. I shortly discuss the correctness of the approach to dialectic as a special kind of logic and relation of dialectic to formal logic. (Subjective) dialectic is interpreted as a method of inquiry that is closely related to contemporary projects of abductive and interrogative logic. Such method reflects on our theoretical practices and formulates strategic rules that guide inquiry and aim at enhancing its productivity.
Further, the three familiar moments of dialectics are scrutinized and interpreted from “analytic” point of view. The abstract moment refers thematically to the object language (in different domains) that has no awareness of its own implicit presuppositions. It is a rigid and hence finite form of thinking. The negative-reasonable moment signifies the process of thinking coming into “motion” and is marked by noticing and reflecting on the presuppositions of the object speech. It tries to establish the connection between different domains and apprehend and bring the previously concealed presuppositions into a consistent system. This is a questioning of the concealed premises, which implies a resolution of conundrums emerged and a connection of it into a whole unified system of differentiated and articulated content with awareness of presuppositions. This allows to accomplish both semantic and conceptual progress as an increase of distinctions and nuances in our thinking. The resolution of the second negative moment is labeled as the positive-reasonable or speculative moment. It contains the results and contents of previous moments and also implies that the method itself and its actor comes to the fore. That actor is the collective epistemic agent in its different forms, Hegel calls it the Concept. Thus, dialectic is a reflective pragmatic approach or method of inquiry, which strives to be developed into a dynamic or genetic theory of categories.
Толық мәтін

Авторлар туралы
Denis Maslov
Institute of Philosophy and Law, SB RAS
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: denn.maslov@gmail.com
Ресей, Novosibirsk
Әдебиет тізімі
- Гегель Г. В. Ф. Раб. разн. лет: В 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1970.
- Еемерен Ф. Х., ван Гроотендорст Р. Систематическая теория аргументации: прагма-диалектический подход. М.: «Канон+» РООИ «Реабилитация», 2021.
- Кант И. Соч. на нем. и русс. яз.: В 4 т. / Под ред. Б. Бушлинга и Н. Мотрошиловой. М.: Мысль, 2006. Т. 2.
- Лисанюк Е. Н. Аргументация и убеждение. СПб.: Наука, 2015.
- Лисанюк Е. Н. Три взгляда на критику и поддержку в оценке аргументов // Дискурс. 2022. Т. 8. № 2. С. 5–16.
- Маслов Д. К. Понятие в субъективной логике Гегеля // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Серия Философия. Социология. Политология. 2022. № 70.
- Прист Г. За пределами мысли. М: «Канон+» РООИ «Реабилитация», 2022.
- Bencivenga E. Hegel’s Dialectical Logic. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Brandom R. A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.
- Brandom R. Holism and Idealism in Hegel’s Phenomenology // Hegel-Studien. 2001. Vol. 36. P. 61–96.
- Chalmers D. Why Isn’t There More Progress in Philosophy? // Being, Freedom and Method. Themes From the Philosophy of Peter van Inwagen / J. Keller (ed.). N.Y.: Oxford University Press, P. 277–298.
- Davidson D. Dialektik Und Dialog: Rede von Donald Davidson Anlässlich Der Verleihung Des Hegel-Preises 1992. Fr.a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1993.
- Demmerling C. Philosophie als Kritik. Grundprobleme der Dialektik Hegels und das Programm kritischer Theorie // C. Demmerling, F. Kambartel (Hg.). Vernunftkritik nach Hegel: Analytisch-Kritische Interpretationen Zur Dialektik. Fr.a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1992. S. 67–99.
- Düsing K. Aufhebung der Tradition im dialektischen Denken. Untersuchungen zu Hegels Logik, Ethik und Ästhetik. München; Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, 2013.
- Forster M. Hat jede wahre Philosophie eine skeptische Seite? // Skeptizismus und Metaphysik / M. Gabriel (ed.). B.: De Gruyter, 2011. S. 261–294.
- Forster M. Hegel and Skepticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
- Gabriel M. Skeptizismus und Idealismus in der Antike. Fr.a.M.: Suhrkamp, 2009.
- Hegel G. W. F. Dissertatio Philosophica de Orbitis Planetarum: Lateinisch-Deutsch. Hamburg: Meiner, 2022.
- Hegel G. W. F. Werke: In 20 Bd. Fr.a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1986.
- Hegel Und Die Antike Dialektik / H.-G. Gadamer et al. (Hg.). Fr.a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1990.
- Heidemann D. Der Begriff des Skeptizismus. Seine systematischen Formen, die pyrrhonische Skepsis und Hegels Herausforderung. B.: De Gruyter, 2007.
- Henrich D. Hegels Grundoperation // Der Idealismus Und Seine Gegenwart: Festschrift Für Werner Marx Zum 65. Geburtstag / W. Marx et al. (Hg.). Hamburg: Meiner, 1976. S. 208–230.
- Hintikka J. Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999.
- Koch A. Die Selbstbeziehung Der Negation in Hegels Logik // Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung. 1999. Bd. 53. H. 1. S. 1–29.
- Koch A. Metaphysik und speculative Logik // Metaphysik heute — Probleme und Perspektiven der Ontologie / Metaphysics Today — Problems and Prospects of Ontology / M. Lutz-Bachmann, T. M. Schmidt (Hg.). Freiburg; München: Karl Alber, 2007.
- Kreis G. Negative Dialektik Des Unendlichen: Kant, Hegel, Cantor. B.: Suhrkamp, 2015. S. 322–327.
- Menke Ch. Der „Wendungspunkt“ des Erkennens. Zu Begriff, Recht und Reichweite der Dialektik in Hegels Logik // Vernunftkritik nach Hegel: Analytisch-Kritische Interpretationen Zur Dialektik / C. Demmerling, F. Kambartel (Hg.). Fr.a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1992.
- Pinkard T. Hegel’s Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.
- Pippin R. Die Logik der Negation bei Hegel // Hegel — 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik: Beiträge zur internationalen Tagung “200 Jahre Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik”, Weimar, 26–29 September 2012 / A. F. Koch, F. Schick, K. Vieweg, C. Wirsing (Hg.). Hamburg: Meiner, 2014. S. 87–107.
- Pippin R. Hegel’s Realm of Shadows. Logic as Metaphysics in The Science of Logic. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2018.
- Rescher N. Dialectics: A Classical Approach to Inquiry. Fr.a.M.: Ontos, 2007.
- Rescher N. Philosophical Dialectics: An Essay on Metaphilosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2006.
- Schnädelbach H. Dialektik und Diskurs // Herbert Schnädelbach. Vernunft und Geschichte. Vorträge und Abhandlungen. Fr.a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1987. S. 151–176.
- Schnädelbach H. Was Philosophen wissen und was man von ihnen lernen kann. München: C. H. Beck, 2013.
- Schurz G. Patterns of Abduction // Synthese. 2008. Vol. 164. № 2. P. 201–234.
- Sextus Empiricus. Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes // Sextus Empiricus. Opera / H. Mutschmann (Hg.). Leipzig: Teubner, 1912. Vol. 1. P. 3–209.
- Stekeler-Weithofer P. Hegels Analytische Philosophie: Die Wissenschaft Der Logik Als Kritische Theorie Der Bedeutung. Paderborn: F. Schöningh, 1992.
- Stekeler-Weithofer P. Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik: ein dialogischer Kommentar: In 3 Bd. Hamburg: Meiner, 2019–2022.
- Wolff M. Hegels Dialektik // Hegel — 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik: Beiträge zur internationalen Tagung “200 Jahre Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik”, Weimar, 26–29 September 2012 / A. F. Koch, F. Schick, K. Vieweg, C. Wirsing (Hg.). Hamburg: Meiner, 2014.
Қосымша файлдар
