Редакция саясаты

Журнал тақырыбы

Logos Journal will publish contributions of high quality in any area of philosophy, social and humansciences, as well as cross- and interdisciplinary fields.

Бөлімдер мен бағыттар

A NEW AGE OF SUSPICION

CRINGE

A RUPTURE AND AN EVENT

TOWARDS THE PROBLEM OF MIMETICISM

AN INNER EXPERIENCE

AFTER REPRESENTATION

EARTHLY MECHANICS OF MAPS

DIGITAL EARTH

THE RIGHT TO UTOPIA: THE INTERFACES OF COSINESS

DESPITE UTOPIA: BROKEN ALGORITHMSAND UNCOSY ENTITIES

THE “LAST” WAR AND THE DIGITAL WORLD

CRITIQUE

THE SCIENCE OF LOGIC AS METAPHYSICS

HEGEL IN AMERICA

LESSONS

PAVLOVSKY

Рецензиялау

The following regulations shall apply to review of any manuscript submitted for publishing in the Logos philosophical and literary journal (hereinafter referred to as Journal):

1. General Guidelines

All manuscripts submitted to Journal are subjected to double-blind peer reviewing (any information about Reviewer is confidential to Author and vice versa).

Only highly professional specialists recognized for their competence and scholarly background within the framework of the reviewed manuscript can act as Reviewers. Author/Co-author of the manuscript cannot take the responsibility of Reviewer.

2. Reviewing Arrangements

The secretary of Journal within 10 days notifies Authors of the manuscript receipt.

Once the manuscript has been received, the review process is limited to 2-4 months. However, the editorial board retains the right to set deadlines for reviewing on a case-by-case basis.

The process of reviewing is carried out in several stages: a) At the first stage, Reviewer evaluates the manuscript from the point of its compliance with the journal profile, scientificity, and formatting; b) At the second stage, the content of the manuscript is analyzed in relation to its compliance with the declared title, clear formulation of the objectives and methods used to achieve them, novelty and relevance of the obtained results, personal contribution of Author to solution of the research problem, correct interpretation of the obtained data and their relevance, sufficient validity of the presented conclusions. Furthermore, Reviewer notes all inaccuracies, errors, and technical mistakes, as well as thoroughly studies the abstract quality, completeness of the list of references and its compliance with the studied problem.

The results of reviewing are being described in a justified conclusion:

1. Recommended for publishing unaltered.
2. Recommended for publishing after correction of the deficiencies noted by Reviewer.
3. Recommended for publishing after correction of the deficiencies and repeated reviewing.
4. Not recommended for publishing.
5. Recommended for publishing in another journal.

The decision to publish the manuscript rests ultimately with the executive editor on the basis of the feedback provided by Reviewer. When stumbling upon the negative review, the manuscript is not published or returned to The decision to publish the manuscript rests ultimately with the executive editor on the basis of the feedback provided by Reviewer. When stumbling upon the negative review, the manuscript is not published or returned to Author. In case of the positive review, the final decision to publish the manuscript is made by the editorial board of Journal. The secretary is obligated to inform Author about the decision of Editor and provides them with a copy of the review.

3. Review Format

The review is written in free format or by filling in the form recommended by the editorial board. The review shall be signed by the person who performed it.

4. Storage and Handling of Reviews

The original versions of all reviews should be stored in the editorial office for 5 years from the date of publication of the manuscript. Their copies can be sent at request to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

Кезеңділігі

6 выпусков в год

Кейінге қалдырылған ашық рұқсат

Бұл журналдың мазмұны ашық қол жетімді болады 2 нөмір жарияланғаннан кейін бірнеше айдан кейін.

Journal Policy

Logos Journal will publish contributions of high quality in any area of philosophy, social and humansciences, as well as cross- and interdisciplinary fields. Papers submitted should display high degree of usual academic virtues (argument, structure, originality, consistency), but also be written in clear, enjoyable,elegant way, accessible to anyone not possessing detailed knowledge of its subjectmatter.

Logos is willing to consider submissions from coordinators of thematic clusters consisting of some/several closely-related papers (e.g. papers of a symposium). Written permission of individual authors for a joint submission of their work must be obtained.

Logos welcomes unsolicited contributions of three types: articles, book reviews and discussion notes.

Terms of publication

Authors should follow the formatting and citation style of recent issues of Logos.

An abstract of 200 to 250 words, and a list of keywords, should be added at the first page of paper, under the title.

Authors should indicate their current affiliation.

For book reviews, individuals should propose titles to be reviewed. No book reviews are to be submitted without a prior consent of a Book Review Editor. There is no guarantee of review of any book, even if a copy is supplied.

Publication ethics

Logos journal is committed to the highest ethical standards and takes all possible measures to make sure these standards are upheld in our publication practices. We expect the same from prospective authors and reserve the right to reject any submissions found to be in violation of the standards laid out below.

Submission Expectations and Copyright

Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in either their current form or a substantially similar form, and they should not be under consideration for publication with another journal. All authors submitting their works acknowledge that they have disclosed any and all actual or potential conflicts of interest regarding authorship and publication of the work and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.

Permission

Prior to article submission, authors should secure permission to use any content that has not been created by them. Failure to do so may lead to lengthy delays in publication. The editors of Logos are unable to publish any article which has permission pending. The rights we require are:

1. Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the article or book chapter.
2. Print and electronic rights.
3. The right to use the material for the life of the work (i.e. there should be no time restrictions on the re-use of material, e.g. a one-year license).

When reproducing tables, figures or excerpts (of more than 400 words) from another source, it is expected that:

1. Authors obtain the necessary written permission in advance from any third party owners of copyright for the use in print and electronic formats of any of their text, illustrations, graphics, or other material, in their manuscript. Permission must also be secured for any minor adaptations of any work not created by them.
2. If an author adapts significantly any material, the author must inform the copyright holder of the original work.
3. Authors must obtain any necessary proof of consent statements.
4. Authors must always acknowledge the source in figure captions and refer to the source in the reference list.
5. Authors should not assume that any content which is freely available on the web is free to use. Authors should check the website for details of the copyright holder to seek permission for re-use.

The following improper practices will result in automatic rejection and may have professional and/or legal repercussions:

1. Verbatim copying
2. Verbatim copying of another person's work without acknowledgement, references or the use of quotation marks.

Paraphrasing

Improper paraphrasing of another person's work is where more than one sentence within a paragraph or section of text has been changed or sentences have been rearranged without appropriate attribution. Significant improper paraphrasing (more than 10 percent of a work) without appropriate attribution is treated as seriously as verbatim copying.

Reusing parts of a work without attribution

Reuse of elements of another person's work, for example a figure, table or paragraph without acknowledgement, references or the use of quotation marks. It is incumbent on the author to obtain the necessary permission to reuse elements of another person's work from the copyright holder.

Self plagiarism

Our requirement is that all authors sign a copyright form that clearly states that their submitted work has not been published before. If elements of a work have been previously published in another publication, including an earlier publication in Logos, the author is required to acknowledge the earlier work and indicate how the subsequent work differs and builds upon the research and conclusions contained in the previous work. Verbatim copying of an author's own work and improper paraphrasing are not acceptable, and we recommend that previous research should only be mentioned to support new conclusions.

We recommend that authors acknowledge all previous stages of presentation of their ideas that have culminated in the final work, including conference papers, workshop presentations and listserv communications.

Handling allegations of plagiarism

The editors of Logos seek to uphold academic integrity and to protect authors' moral rights. We take all cases of plagiarism very seriously, being aware of the potential impact an allegation of plagiarism can have on a researcher's career. Therefore, we have procedures in place to deal with alleged cases of plagiarism.

In order for us to take an unbiased approach, we investigate each case thoroughly, seeking clarification from all affected parties.

If we are approached by a third party with an allegation of plagiarism, we will always seek a response from the original author(s) or copyright holder(s) before we decide on a course of action. We will not be influenced by other parties and will form our decisions in an unbiased and objective manner.

The editors are not obliged to discuss individual cases of alleged plagiarism with third parties. We reserve the right not to proceed with a case if the complainant presents a false name or affiliation or acts in an inappropriate or threatening manner toward the editorial staff.