The Ciboney and the Taino in the Context of Craniometric Variation in Native American Population

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The article examines two cranial samples representing the pre-Columbian population of Cuba (the Ciboney and the Taino), in the general context of craniometric variation in the indigenous population of the American continent. Published craniometric data from various sources were used for comparison by the canonical discriminant analysis and calculation of pairwise squared Mahalanobis distances. The question is raised about the possibility of including artificially deformed crania (of which the Taino and many other American samples are entirely composed) in the analyses using only the metrics of the facial skeleton. When analyzing samples without artificial deformation, similarities were found between the Ciboney and South American groups, mainly from the West, which may indicate their origin from an ancient and less differentiated type that inhabited Central and northwestern South America in ancient times. The results of the analysis combining deformed and non-deformed samples are more difficult to interpret, which may indicate a significant influence of cranial vault deformation on the morphology of the facial skeleton, but they do not contradict the conclusions of studies of related sciences about the South American origin of the Taino.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Taisiya Syutkina

Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: syuttaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6222-4929

младший научный сотрудник центра антропоэкологии

Ресей, 32a Leninsky prospekt, Moscow, 119991

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Alexeev, V.P. 1985. O nekotorykh morfologicheskikh osobennostiakh aborigenov Ameriki, vazhnykh dlia rekonstruktsii protsessa ee zaseleniia [On Some Morphological Features of the American Aborigines Important for Reconstructing the Process of Its Settlement]. In Istoricheskie sud’by amerikanskikh indeitsev: problemy indeanistiki [Historical Destinies of American Indians: The Problems of Indian Studies], edited by V.A. Tishkov, 24–30. Moscow: Nauka.
  2. Alekseev, V.P. 1986. K kraniologicheskoi kharakteristike aborigennogo naseleniia Kuby [On the Craniological Characteristic of the Cuban Aboriginal Population]. In Arkheologiia Kuby [Archaeology of Cuba], edited by R.S. Vasilievskii, 15–22. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
  3. Alexeev, V.P., and G.F. Debetz. 1964. Kraniometriia. Metodika antropologicheskikh issledovanii [Craniometry: Methods of Anthropological Study]. Moscow: Nauka.
  4. Anton, S.C. 1989. Intentional Cranial Vault Deformation and Induced Changes of the Cranial Base and Face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 79 (2): 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330790213
  5. Björk, A., and L. Björk. 1964. Artificial Deformation and Cranio-Facial Asymmetry in Ancient Peruvians. Journal of Dental Research 43 (3): 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345640430030601
  6. Brace, C.L., A.R. Nelson, and P. Qifeng. 2004. A Comparative Craniofacial View. In The Settlement of the American Continents: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Human Biogeography, edited by C.M. Barton, G.A. Clark, D.R. Yesner, and G.A. Pearson, 28–38. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  7. Callaghan, R.T. 2001. Ceramic Age Seafaring and Interaction Potential in the Antilles: A Computer Simulation. Current Anthropology 42: 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/320012
  8. Callaghan, R.T. 2003. Comments on the Mainland Origins of the Preceramic Cultures of the Greater Antilles. Latin American Antiquity 14 (3): 323–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/3557564
  9. Castro Stepanova, A.A., and N.N. Goncharova. 2019. Kraniologicheskaia kharakteristika naseleniia Chili dokolumbovoi epokhi (na primere nekropolia Chunchuri): iskusstvennaia deformatsiia i morfometricheskie osobennosti [Craniological Characteristic of the Chilean Pre-Columbian Era Population (Based on the Chunchuri Necropolis): Artificial Cranial Deformation and Morphometric Features]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia XXIII. Antropologiia 1: 18–34. https://doi.org/10.32521/2074–8132.2019.1.018–034
  10. Cheverud, J.M., L.A.P. Kohn, L.W. Konigsberg, and S.R. Leigh. 1992. Effects of Fronto-Occipital Artificial Cranial Vault Modification on the Cranial Base and Face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 88 (3): 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330880307
  11. Cocilovo, J.A., H.H. Varela, and T.G. O’Brien. 2011. Effects of Artificial Deformation on Cranial Morphogenesis in the South Central Andes. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 21 (3): 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.1141
  12. Debetz, G.F. 1951. Antropologicheskie issledovaniia v Kamchatskoi oblasti [Anthropological Research in the Kamchatka Region]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.
  13. Dembo, A., and J. Imbelloni. 1938. Deformaciones Intencionales del Cuerpo Humano [Intentional Deformations of the Human Body]. Buenos Aires: Humanior.
  14. Evteev, A., A.L. Cardini, I. Morozova, and P. O’Higgins. 2014. Extreme Climate, Rather than Population History, Explains Mid‐Facial Morphology of Northern Asians. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 153 (3): 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22444
  15. Febles Dueñas, J. 1988. Manual para el Estudio de la Piedra Tallada de los Aborígenes de Cuba [Manual for the Study of the Carved Stone of the Aborigines of Cuba]. Havana: Editorial Academia.
  16. Febles Dueñas, J. 1991. Estudio Comparativo de las Industrias de la Piedra Tallada de Aguas Verdes (Baracoa) y Playitas (Matanzas): Probable Relación de Estas Industrias con Otras del S.E de los Estados Unidos [A Comparative Study of the Carved Stone Industries of Aguas Verdes (Baracoa) and Playitas (Matanzas): Probable Relationship of These Industries with Others in the S.E. of the United States]. In Arqueología de Cuba y otras Areas Antillanas [Archaeology of Cuba and Other Antillian Areas], edited by M.A. Rodríguez, 312–370. Havana: Editorial Academia.
  17. Febles, J. 1986. Kamennye orudiia kompleksa Seboruko [Stone Tools from the Seboruko Complex]. In Arkheologiia Kuby [Archaeology of Cuba], edited by R.S. Vasilievskii, 23–33. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
  18. Fernandes, D.M., et al. 2021. A Genetic History of the Pre-Contact Caribbean. Nature 590: 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586–020–03053–2
  19. Fuselli, S., et al. 2003. Mitochondrial DNA Diversity in South America and the Genetic History of Andean Highlanders. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20 (10): 1682–1691. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg188
  20. Galich, M. 1990. Istoriia dokolumbovykh tsivilizatsii [History of Pre-Columbian Civilizations]. Moscow: Mysl’.
  21. Ginzburg, V.V. 1967. Antropologicheskaia kharakteristika drevnikh aborigenov Kuby [Anthropological Characteristics of the Ancient Population of Cuba]. In Sbornik Muzeia antropologii i etnografii AN SSSR [Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of the USSR Academy of Sciences], edited by L.P. Potapov, XXIV: 180–278. Leningrad: Nauka.
  22. González-José, R. 2003. El Poblamiento de la Patagonia. Análisis de la Variación Craneofacial en el Contexto del Poblamiento Americano [The Settlement of Patagonia: Analysis of Craniofacial Variation in the Context of the American Population]. PhD diss., Universitat de Barcelona.
  23. Granberry, J. 1980. West Indian Languages: A Review and Commentary. Journal of the Virgin Islands Archaeological Society 10: 51–56.
  24. Guarch Delmonte, J.M. 1978. El Taíno de Cuba: Ensayo de Reconstrucción Etno-Histórica [The Taíno of Cuba: Essay on Ethno-Historical Reconstruction]. Habana: Academia de Ciencias de Cuba.
  25. Hammer, O., D.A.T. Harper, and P.D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4 (1): 1–9.
  26. Herrera Fritot, R. 1964. Craneotrigonometria [Craniotrigonometry]. La Habana: Comision Nacional de la Academia de Ciencias de la República de Cuba.
  27. Howells, W.W. 1989. Skull Shapes and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo. Cambridge: Harvard University.
  28. Hubbe, M., A. Strauss, A. Hubbe, and W.A. Neves. 2015. Early South Americans Cranial Morphological Variation and the Origin of American Biological Diversity. PLoS One 10 (10): e0138090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138090
  29. Hubbe, M., T. Hanihara, and K. Harvati. 2009. Climate Signatures in the Morphological Differentiation of Worldwide Modern Human Populations. The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology 292 (11): 1720–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20976
  30. Kohn, L.A.P., S.R. Leigh, S.C. Jacobs, and J.M. Cheverud. 1993. Effects of Annular Cranial Vault Modification on the Cranial Base and Face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 90 (2): 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330900203
  31. Kozintsev, A.G. 2007. Skify Severnogo Prichernomor’ia: mezhgruppovye razlichiia, vneshnie sviazi, proiskhozhdenie [Scythians of the Northern Black Sea Region: Intergroup Differences, External Relations, Origins]. Arkheologiia, etnografiia i antropologiia Evrazii 4 (32): 143–157.
  32. Lalueza‐Fox, C., et al. 2003. Mitochondrial DNA from Pre‐Columbian Ciboneys from Cuba and the Prehistoric Colonization of the Caribbean. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 121 (2): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10236
  33. Menéndez, L.P., K. Rademaker, and K. Harvati. 2019. Revisiting East–West Skull Patterns and the Role of Random Factors in South America: Cranial Reconstruction and Morphometric Analysis of the Facial Skeleton from Cuncaicha Rockshelter (Southern Peru). PaleoAmerica 5 (4): 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1703167
  34. Menéndez, L.P. 2018. Moderate Climate Signature in Cranial Anatomy of Late Holocene Human Populations from Southern South America. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 165 (2): 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23355
  35. Nägele, K., et al. 2020. Genomic Insights into the Early Peopling of the Caribbean. Science 369 (6502): 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba8697
  36. Napolitano, M.F., et al. 2019. Reevaluating Human Colonization of the Caribbean Using Chronometric Hygiene and Bayesian Modeling. Science Advances 5 (12): eaar7806. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar7806
  37. Perez Carratala, A., and G. Izquierdo Díaz. 2010. Cuba. Intercambios Socioculturales en el Periodo Aborigen con el Caribe [Cuba: Sociocultural Exchanges in the Aboriginal Period with the Caribbean]. Cuba Arqueológica 3 (2): 6–16.
  38. Pospisil, M., and M.F. Rivero de la Calle. 1964. Estudios de los Craneos Aborigenes de Cuba del Grupo no Ceramista [Studies of the Aboriginal Skulls of Cuba from the Non-Ceramic Group]. In VII Mezhdunarodnyi kongress antropologicheskikh i etnograficheskikh nauk (Moskva, avgust 1964) [VII International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnographic Science (Moscow, August 1964], 3: 87–98. Moscow: Nauka.
  39. Powell, J.F., and W.A. Neves. 1999. Craniofacial Morphology of the First Americans: Pattern and Process in the Peopling of the New World. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 110 (S29): 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096–8644(1999)110:29+<153:: AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-L
  40. Pucciarelli, H.M., et al. 2006. East-West Cranial Differentiation in Pre-Columbian Human Populations of South America. Homo 57 (2): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2005.12.003
  41. Pucciarelli, H.M., et al. 2008. East-West Cranial Differentiation in Pre-Columbian Populations from Central and North America. Journal of Human Evolution 54 (3): 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.08.011
  42. Pucciarelli, H.M. 2004. Migraciones y Variación Craneofacial Humana en América [Migrations and Craniofacial Variety in America]. Complutum 15: 225–247.
  43. Razhev, D.I. 2009. Bioantropologiia naseleniia sargatskoi obshchnosti [Biological Anthropology of the Sargat Community]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN.
  44. Rey Bettancourt, E., and F. García Rodríguez. 1988. Similitud Entre los Artefactos Liticos Del Lejano Oriente de Asia y de Cuba [Similarity between Lithic Artifacts from Far East Asia and Cuba]. In Anuario de Arqueología [Yearbook of Archaeology], edited by J. Febles et al., 1–13. Havana: Academia de Ciencias de Cuba.
  45. Rhode, M.P., and B.T. Arriaza. 2006. Influence of Cranial Deformation on Facial Morphology among Prehistoric South Central Andean Populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 130 (4): 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20333
  46. Rightmire, G.P. 1969. On the Computation of Mahalanobis’ Generalized Distance (D2). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 30 (1): 157–160 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330300121
  47. Rodríguez Cuenca, J.V. 2001. Los Chibchas: Adaptación y Diversidad en los Andes Orientales de Colombia [The Chibchas: Adaptation and Diversity in the Eastern Andes of Colombia]. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
  48. Rodríguez Flórez, C.D. 2019. A Brief History of Pre-Hispanic Skeletal Collections in the Northern Andes of Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador. In Biological Anthropology of Latin America: Historical Development and Recent Advances, edited by D.H. Ubelaker and S.E. Colantonio, 203–215. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
  49. Romano, A.P. 1956. Los Restos Óseos Humanos de la Cueva de la Candelaria, Coahuila: Craneología [Human Bone Remains from the Cueva de la Candelaria, Coahuila: Craneology]. PhD diss., Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
  50. Ross, A.H., and D.H. Ubelaker. 2009. Effect of Intentional Cranial Modification on Craniofacial Landmarks: A Three-Dimensional Perspective. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 20 (6): 2185–2187. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181bf038c
  51. Ross, A.H., D.H. Ubelaker, and A.B. Falsetti. 2002. Craniometric Variation in the Americas. Human Biology 74 (6): 807–818.
  52. Rothhammer, F., and C. Silva. 1990. Craniometrical Variation among South American Prehistoric Populations: Climatic, Altitudinal, Chronological, and Geographic Contributions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 82 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330820103
  53. Rothhammer, F., J.A. Cocilovo, S. Quevedo, and E. Llop. 1982. Microevolution in Prehistoric Andean Populations: I. Chronologic Craniometric Variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 58 (4): 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330580406
  54. Rouse, I. 1992. The Tainos: Rise and Decline of the People Who Greeted Columbus. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  55. Shirobokov, I.G. 2021. O primenenii usrednennoi matritsy korreliatsii v kraniometrii [On the Application of the Averaged Correlation Matrix in Craniometry]. Camera praehistorica 1 (6): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.31250/2658–3828–2021–1–63–141–149
  56. Stewart, T.D. 1943. Skeletal Remains with Cultural Associations from the Chicama, Moche, and Virú Valleys, Peru. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 93: 153–185.
  57. Stewart, T.D., and M.T. Newman. 1950. Anthropometry of South American Indian Skeletal Remains. In Handbook of South American Indians, edited by J.H. Steward, 19–42. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  58. Syutkina, T., et al. 2021. Intragroup Variation in the Pre-Columbian Cuba Population: A Perspective from Cranial Morphology. Anthropological Review 84 (3): 233–255. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021–0021
  59. Syutkina, T.A. 2017. Kraniometricheskaia kharakteristika drevnego naseleniia Kuby dokeramicheskoi kul’tury [A Craniometric Study of the Ancient Preceramic Population of Cuba]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 4: 65–82.
  60. Syutkina, T.A. 2018. Iskusstvennaia deformatsiia cherepa u aborigennogo naseleniia dokolumbovoi Kuby [Artificial Cranial Deformation Among the Aboriginal Population of Pre-Columbian Cuba]. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii 4 (43): 136–146. https://doi.org/10.20874/2071–0437–2018–43–4–136–146
  61. Syutkina, T.A. 2023. Paleopatologicheskii analiz kraniologicheskikh serii Kuby dokolumbovoi epokhi [Paleopathological Analysis of the Cranial Samples from Pre-Columbian Cuba]. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii 1 (60): 139–150. https://doi.org/10.20874/2071–0437–2023–60–1–12
  62. Tacoma, J. 1963. American Indians from Suriname, a Physical Anthropological Study. PhD diss., University of Utrecht.
  63. Tacoma, J. 1963. Studies on the Physical Anthropology of the Netherlands Antilles: III: Kunstmatige Schedeldeformatie in Aruba. Nieuwe West-Indische Gids/New West Indian Guide 43: 211–222.
  64. Torres Etayo, D.A. 2006. Taínos: Mitos y Realidades de un Pueblo sin Rostro [Taínos: Myths and Realities of a Faceless People]. México: Editorial Asesor Pedagógico.
  65. Ubelaker, D.H. 1981. The Ayalan Cemetery: A Late Integration Period Burial Site on the South Coast of Ecuador. In Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 29. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.29.1
  66. Valdés Bernal, S. 2003. Visión Lingüística del Caribe Insular Precolombino. Catauro. Revista Cubana de Antropología 5 (8): 159–177.
  67. Van Heekeren, H.R. 1963. Studies on the Archaeology of the Netherlands Antilles: III: Prehistorical Research on the Islands of Curaçao, Aruba and Bonaire in 1960. Nieuwe West-Indische Gids/New West Indian Guide 43: 1–24.
  68. Vasiliev, S.A., et al. 2015. Zaselenie chelovekom Novogo Sveta: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniia [Peopling of The New World: A Multidisciplinary Study]. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia.
  69. Vasilievskii, R.S., ed. 1986. Arkheologiia Kuby [Archaeology of Cuba]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
  70. Verano, J.W. 1987. Cranial Microvariation at Pacatnamú: A Study of Cemetery Population Variability (Peru). PhD diss., University of California.
  71. von Cramon-Taubadel, N. 2014. Evolutionary Insights into Global Patterns of Human Cranial Diversity: Population History, Climatic and Dietary Effects. Journal of Anthropological Science 92 (4): 43–77. https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.91010
  72. Waters, M.R. 2019. Late Pleistocene Exploration and Settlement of the Americas by Modern Humans. Science 365 (6449): eaat5447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat5447
  73. Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  74. Wilson, S.M., H.B. Iceland, and T.R. Hester. 1998. Preceramic Connections between Yucatan and the Caribbean. Latin American Antiquity 9 (4): 342–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/3537032
  75. Zubov, A.A. 1999. Biologo-antropologicheskaia kharakteristika korennogo doevropeiskogo naseleniia Ameriki [Biological and Anthropological Characteristics of the Indigenous Pre-European Population of America]. In Naselenie Novogo Sveta: problemy formirovaniia i sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiia [Population of the New World: Problems of Formation and Sociocultural Development], edited by A.A. Istomin, 11–66. Moscow: IEA RAN.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Geographical location of the places of origin of the series involved in the comparative analysis. A: North and Central America. B: South America

Жүктеу (181KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. The location of male series of undeformed skulls in the space of the first two canonical vectors. 1 - Central America; 2 - north and northeast of South America; 3 - Andes; 4 - Tierra del Fuego and Patagonia; 5 - subarctic and northwest coast of North America; 6 - central North America; 7 - southwest of North America; 8 - southeast of North America

Жүктеу (185KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. The arrangement of female series of undeformed skulls in the space of the first two canonical vectors. Territorial groups as in Fig. 2.

Жүктеу (181KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».