Institutions of Conscience: Beliefs and Experience in the Procedure of Substituting Military Service with Alternative Service

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article considers the role of the concept of conscience in the bureaucratic mechanisms of the institution of alternative civilian service in contemporary Russia. The field research was conducted in a St. Petersburg human rights organization in 2020–2024. The materials were methodological recommendations of human rights defenders, ego-documents of NCO clients, including statements with stated beliefs, and records of recruitment commissions. The analysis made it possible to describe the repertoire of means of ensuring the state’s access to the conscience of the conscript and to see how beliefs become an element of citizen-state communication and part of the formal procedure. Drawing on critical studies of human rights and the modern subject, I show how global ethical and legal doctrine is embodied in the actual work of the institution of military registration. The key thesis of the article is that the institutionalization of conscience inevitably leads to the delegation of the need to speak out on behalf of the subject to other people and institutions and the distribution of responsibility and authority among them.

About the authors

N. V Shevchenko

European University at St. Petersburg

Author for correspondence.
Email: nshevchenko@eu.spb.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3856-5467
St. Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Арендт Х. Истоки тоталитаризма. М.: ЦентрКом, 1996.
  2. Байбурин А. Советский паспорт: история – структура – практики. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского ун-та в Санкт-Петербурге, 2017.
  3. Брубейкер Р., Купер Ф. За пределами “идентичности” // Ab Imperio. 2002. № 3. С. 61–115. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2002.0025
  4. Дворкин Р. О правах всерьез. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2004.
  5. Зарецкий Ю. Моя жизнь для Государства: массовая практика составления делопроизводственных автобиографий советскими людьми // Новое литературное обозрение. 2019. №. 3 (157). С. 107–127.
  6. Пичичеро К. Военное просвещение. Война и культура во Французской империи от Людовика XIV до Наполеона. СПб.: Библиороссика, 2024.
  7. Раз Д. Авторитет права. Эссе о праве и морали. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара, 2021.
  8. Хант Л. Изобретение прав человека: история. М.: Новое литературное обозрение. 2023.
  9. Хонинева Е. Семиотическая бдительность и культивация искренности в католической практике распознавания призвания // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2019. Т. 37 (4). С. 102–129. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2019-37-4-102-129
  10. Шевченко Н. Бюрократические маршруты и документные темпоральности анкеты призывника в правозащитной организации // Антропологический форум. 2023. № 59. С. 73–102. https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-59-73-102
  11. Эльстер Ю. Локальная справедливость и межличностные сравнения // Логос. 2007. № 5. С. 134–161.
  12. Buitron N., Steinmüller H. State Legibility and Mind Legibility in the Original Political Society // Religion and Society. 2021. Vol. 12 (1). P. 39–55. https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2021.120104
  13. Douzinas C. The End of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart, 2000.
  14. Engelke M. Religion and the Media Turn: A Review Essay // American Ethnologist. 2010. Vol. 37 (2). P. 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01261.x
  15. Gergen K.J. Narrative, Moral Identity, and Historical Consciousness: A Social Constructionist Account // Narration, Identity, and Historical Consciousness / Ed. J. Straub. N.Y.: Berghahn Books, 2005. P. 99–119.
  16. Gergen K.J., Gergen M.M. Narratives of the Self // Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences / Eds. L.P. Hinchman, S.K. Hinchman. N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1997. P. 161–184.
  17. Haeri N. Unbundling Sincerity: Language, Mediation, and Interiority in Comparative Perspective // HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2017. Vol. 7 (1). P. 123–138. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.013
  18. Hopgood S. The Endtimes of Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013.
  19. Houston C. Conscientious Objection or Objecting to the Conscience? Notes Toward an Anthropology of the Conscience // Social Analysis. 2023. Vol. 67 (3). P. 26–44. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2023.670302
  20. Jancke G. Autobiography as Social Practice in Early Modern German-Speaking Areas: Historical, Methodological, and Theoretical Perspectives // Autobiographical Themes in Turkish Literature: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives / Eds. O. Akyildiz, K. Halim, B. Sagaster. Wurzburg: Ergon. 2007. P. 65–80.
  21. Katriel T. Defiant Discourse: Speech and Action in Grassroots Activism. L.: Routledge, 2020.
  22. Keane W. Sincerity, “Modernity”, and the Protestants // Cultural Anthropology. 2002. Vol. 17 (1). P. 65–92.
  23. Keane W. Christian Moderns: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
  24. Kelly M. Theories of Justice and Street-Level Discretion // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1994. Vol. 4 (2). P. 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037201
  25. Kelly T. Citizenship, Cowardice, and Freedom of Conscience: British Pacifists in the Second World War // Comparative Studies in Society and History. 2015. Vol. 57 (3). P. 694–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417515000250
  26. Kelly T. Beyond Ethics: Conscience, Pacifism, and the Political in Wartime Britain // HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2018a. Vol. 8 (1–2). P. 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1086/698431
  27. Kelly T. A Divided Conscience: The Lost Convictions of Human Rights // Public Culture. 2018b. Vol. 30 (3). P. 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-6912091
  28. Lambek M. The Continuous and Discontinuous Person: Two Dimensions of Ethical Life // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2013. Vol. 19 (4). P. 837–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12073
  29. MacIntyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, ID: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.
  30. Maclure J., Taylor C. Secularism and Freedom of Conscience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.
  31. Mattingly C. In Search of the Good: Narrative Reasoning in Clinical Practice // Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1998. Vol. 12 (3). P. 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1998.12.3.273
  32. Rawls J. Political Liberalism. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1993.
  33. Sandel M. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  34. Stasch R. Ritual and Oratory Revisited: The Semiotics of Effective Action // Annual Review of Anthropology. 2011. Vol. 40 (1). P. 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145623
  35. Walzer M. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.
  36. Weiss E. Best Practices for Besting the Bureaucracy: Avoiding Military Service in Israel // PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 2016. Vol. 39 (S1). P. 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12169
  37. Weiss E. Competing Ethical Regimes in a Diverse Society: Israeli Military Refusers // American Ethnologist. 2017. Vol. 44 (1). P. 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12425

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).