Indications and contraindications to application of different distraction methods of the ankle in endoscopy
- 作者: Mironov S.P.1, Cherkes-Zade D.D.1, Orletskiy A.K.1, Cherkes-Zade T.D.1
-
隶属关系:
- Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
- 期: 卷 5, 编号 4 (1998)
- 页面: 40-44
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0869-8678/article/view/104854
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto104854
- ID: 104854
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
In 20 patients with sequelae of the ankle injuries arthroscopic operations were performed. Different methods of distraction were used depending upon patient’s age, joint size, pattern and localization of intra-articular pathology, type and planned duration of surgery. In 18 patients follow up ranged from 1 to 5 years. In 16 patients, significant improvement was achieved, 2 patients had pain in joint under prolonged load. Different types of the ankle distraction were described. On the base of publications and authors’ experience the advantages and disadvantages, indications and contraindications of those distraction types were presented.
作者简介
S. Mironov
Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
D. Cherkes-Zade
Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
A. Orletskiy
Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
T. Cherkes-Zade
Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
参考
补充文件
