Projection of cognitive technologies of values transformation on the sovereign russian statehood
- Authors: Vinogradova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 7 (2024)
- Pages: 40-49
- Section: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences: towards the centenary
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1026-9452/article/view/263827
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224070034
- ID: 263827
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the potential of cognitive technologies and their influence on the transformation of domestic historical and legal values. The objective of the study is to identify the need to analyze cognitive technologies as a means of influencing socio-political views that shape Russian sovereign statehood and deliberately distort the facts of historical and legal reality.
The study of sovereign Russian statehood is a task whose complexity is predetermined by many factors. First of all, it should be noted that it is very important to consider it as a system consisting of a number of elements (statehood, sovereignty, etc.). The study of this system presupposes the inevitability of its complex interdisciplinary research, in which it is difficult to do without legal, historical, philosophical, political science, sociological and other aspects. In addition, the analysis of the entire system and its individual elements does not imply conclusions with the proper degree of representativeness without the use of comparative and retrospective methods. The relevance of the study is predetermined by the transformations taking place in modern Russia, caused by both external factors and processes changing the modern political and legal reality, in particular constitutional reforms. The state of bifurcation of the system of international law creates new meanings of basic legal concepts that determine the independence of sovereign states. Scientific research on the topic of sovereignty and its positions in the context of globalization has intensified. The article analyzes the mechanisms aimed at the formation of distorted ideas about historical and legal reality. It is concluded that it is important to form verified, scientifically grounded approaches to the study of facts that have historical, legal, socio-political significance, based on material that is appropriate for doctrinal judgments and the degree of representativeness. This will make it possible to create tools to counter cognitive technologies for transforming traditional Russian values, the use of which can influence the concepts that determine the legal nature of state sovereignty.
Full Text
About the authors
Elena V. Vinogradova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: evsfrf@gmail.ru
Doctor of Law, Professor, Acting First Deputy Director, Chief Researcher, Sector of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Justice
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Baghdasaryan V. E. Learning to think in the paradigm of a new type of war: materials of the Round Table “Information war against the Russian Federation: institutionalization of information warfare in the context of the implementation of the National Security Strategy”. M., 2011. Pp. 95, 96 (in Russ.).
- Beck U. Risk society. On the way to another modern / transl. from German by V. Sedelnik and N. Fedorova; afterword by A. Filippov. M., 2000 (in Russ.).
- Belov P. G. How to assess and minimize the harmful influence of the Russian media: materials of the Round Table “Information war against the Russian Federation: institutionalization of information warfare in the context of the implementation of the National Security Strategy”. M., 2011. Pp. 73–76 (in Russ.).
- Belov P. G. On criteria for assessing and ensuring state sovereignty: materials of the All-Russian Scientific.-total. Conf. “The problem of sovereignty of modern Russia”. M., 2014. Pp. 75–80 (in Russ.).
- Bredikhin A. L. Legal sovereignty of the state: concept and content // Science. Theory. Practice. 2010. No. 1. P. 67 (in Russ.).
- Brubaker R. Ethnicity without groups. M., 2012. P. 69 (in Russ.).
- Bourdieu P. The Beginning. M., 1999. P. 25 (in Russ.).
- Vinogradova E. V. New ideas of domestic constitutionalism. Law as an element of the system of sacred and profane values // State and Law. 2023. No. 3. Pp. 24–31 (in Russ.).
- Vinogradova E. V. Against scrap. On the issue of the formation of the Russian legal identity // Law and management. 2022. No. 10. Pp. 46–49 (in Russ.).
- Vinogradova E. V. Retorsions, reprisals and sanctions. The counterforce of State sovereignty and interstate pressure measures // Law and the State: Theory and Practice. 2022. No. 9. Pp. 66–69 (in Russ.).
- Vinogradova E. V., Danilevskaya I. L., Rattur M. V. The Russian facet of Swedish constitutionalism. // Proceedings of the IGP RAS. 2023. Vol. 18. No. 5. Pp. 11–34 (in Russ.).
- Vinogradova E. V., Zakhartsev S. I. Sovereignty: state-personality-state // Legal policy and legal life. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 156–164 (in Russ.).
- Zhukov V. I. Sovereignty of Russia: national interests, demographic threats and challenges // Herald of the RUDN. Ser.: Economics. 2018. Vol. 26. No. 3. Pp. 335– 346 (in Russ.).
- Kiselyov I. Yu. The problem of the image of the state in international relations: a constructivist paradigm // Politex. 2007. Iss. 3. No. 3. Pp. 253–256 (in Russ.).
- Milusheva T. V., Gadisov S. R. The sovereignty of the state as the basic principle of the Russian Constitution // Legal culture. 2018. No. 4 (35). Pp. 21–27 (in Russ.).
- Mironova N. On the problem of ensuring cognitive security // Economics and management. 2021. No. 1 (157). Pp. 119–125 (in Russ.).
- Multilevel identity / [Z. A. Zhade et al.]. M. – Maikop, 2006. Pp. 8, 9 (in Russ.).
- Ramcharan B. New International Law in the field of protection and security // Chronicle of the United Nations. 2015. Vol. 52. No. 4 (in Russ.).
- Rudakova E. K. Ensuring the demographic security of Russia in the context of cognitive threats: dis. … Doctor of Political Science. N. Novgorod, 2023 (in Russ.).
- Smirnova A. G. Mechanisms of threat construction in interstate relations: abstract … Doctor of Social Sciences. SPb., 2013 (in Russ.).
- Social changes in Russian society in the context of the global crisis / ed. by V. I. Zhukov. M., 2010 (in Russ.).
- Sulakshin S. S. Information war against the Russian Federation: materials of the Round Table “Information war against the Russian Federation: institutionalization of information warfare in the context of the implementation of the National Security Strategy”. M., 2011. Pp. 6–43 (in Russ.).
- Tishkov V. A. Historical culture and identity // Ural Historical Herald. 2011. No. 2 (31). P. 7 (in Russ.).
- Tonkonogov A. V. Limited sovereignty of the Russian Federation as a pseudo-state? // Law and Law. 2019. No. 2. P. 25 (in Russ.).
- Trukhachev V. V. National interests: theoretical discourse of the problem // Herald of the RUDN. 2010. No. 1. Pp. 53– 65 (in Russ.).
- Foucault M. The will to truth. Beyond knowledge, power and sexuality. M., 1996. P. 149 (in Russ.).
- Khalidov D. Sh. About the information war in the West and something about geopolitics: materials of the Round Table “Information war against the Russian Federation: institutionalization of information warfare in the context of the implementation of the National Security Strategy”. M., 2011. P. 45 (in Russ.).
