Problems of compliance with legal technology during the amendments to the Constitution of Russia in 2020 and the subsequent adoption of federal laws
- Authors: Stepkin S.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State Social University
- Issue: No 11 (2024)
- Pages: 200–203
- Section: Scientific reports
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1026-9452/article/view/276481
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224110181
- ID: 276481
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
In the article, the author analyzes the constitutional novelties of 2020, including the emergence of a unified system of public power, the replacement of members of the Federation Council with senators of the Russian Federation, the change in the status of these persons and the composition of the upper house of the Russian Parliament, and also notes the inconsistency of the Federal Law “On General Principles of the organization of public Power in the subjects of the Russian Federation” with the norms of Article 104 of the Constitution Of the Russian Federation in terms of the names of the legislative (representative) bodies of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Special attention is paid to the violation of legal technique in the text of the Basic Law of the country as a result of the changes made and the presence in the Constitution of the Russian Federation of both current senators of the Russian Federation and members of the Federation Council, who ceased to exist. As a change in the situation, it is proposed to resolve the existing contradictions with subsequent amendments to the Basic Law of the country and bring the Federal Law “On General Principles of the Organization of Public Power in the subjects of the Russian Federation” in accordance with the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
Full Text
About the authors
Stanislav P. Stepkin
Russian State Social University
Author for correspondence.
Email: stepkin.sciences@mail.ru
PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Faculty of Law and Legal Regulation
Russian Federation, 4, bld. 1 Vilgelma Pika str., 129226 Moscow.References
- Avakyan S. A. Constitutionalism. Constitutional law. Encyclopedic Dictionary. M., 2000. Pp. 304, 305 (in Russ.).
- Avakyan S. A. The Constitution of Russia: nature, evolution, modernity. 2nd ed. M., 2000. Pp. 228–232 (in Russ.).
- Avakyan S. A. Russian constitutionalism: reflections on jubilee results and prospects // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2024. No. 1. Pp. 10, 11 (in Russ.).
- Vinokurov V. A. Legislation on public authority in Russia: problems of concept and content // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 34–37 (in Russ.).
- Kobzar-Frolova M. N. The system of public authorities of the Russian Federation: concept, characteristic features, interaction // Siberian Legal Review. 2021. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 196 (in Russ.).
- Madaev E. O. Theoretical and legal problems of introducing the term “senator” into the Constitution of the Russian Federation // Prologue: Journal of Law. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 63–71 (in Russ.).
- Migushchenko O. N. The unified system of public authority as a factor of national security of the Russian Federation // Municipal Service: legal issues. 2022. No. 1. P. 7 (in Russ.).
- Sokolova M. A. Identification and elimination of defects in normative legal acts in the mechanism of law-making: dis. … PhD in Law. M., 2018. Pp. 69, 74 (in Russ.).
- Chirkin V. E. Public power in modern society // Journal of Russian law. 2009. No. 7. Pp. 3–13 (in Russ.).
- Ebzeev B. S. Constitution. The Rule of Law. The Constitutional Court. M., 1997. Pp. 30, 31 (in Russ.).
