The legislative and judicial framework for the administrative control authorities in Jordan: what are the risks of social networks on elements of public order?

The study analyzes the concept of administrative control and the distinction between administrative and judicial control authorities. That the objectives of administrative control have expanded to include other elements that fall within the moral aspect of the idea of public order will also be shown. The role of the administrative judiciary in distinguishing between administrative decision and judicial work, and the dangers of social networks on the elements of public order represented by public security, public health, public tranquility, ethics and public morality will be explained as well. The widespread use of social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp has led to a major revolution that has left its effects on all aspects of life, including the public order of countries, which is facing new challenges and threats. The study proved that the concept of administrative control according to jurisprudential trends differs from the legal and judicial concept. It was found that the jurisprudential definitions of administrative control were more comprehensive and general than the legislative and judicial definitions. However, there is a need to expressly stipulate the dangers of social networks that affect the elements of public order, represented by public security, public health, public tranquility, public morality and ethics.