Value foundations of the Philosophy of Law: Russia and Germany
- Authors: Krotkova N.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 7 (2025)
- Pages: 178-191
- Section: Scientific life
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1026-9452/article/view/306375
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945225070193
- ID: 306375
Cite item
Abstract
The participants of the Round Table pointed out the noticeable influence of German philosophy and Philosophy of Law on Russian philosophical and legal thought. Kant and Hegel had the greatest influence. In Russia, Kantianism and Hegelianism prevailed, neo-Kantianism and neo-Hegelianism are extremely fragmented. The influence of German philosophy was accompanied by its deep revision by Russian authors. By the end of the 19th century, a conceptual framework had been created in Russian philosophy and the Philosophy of Law that adequately reflected the richness of German metaphysics.
Keywords
About the authors
N. V. Krotkova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: krotkova2012@yandex.ru
10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow, Russia
References
- Berdyaev N. A. Collected works. Paris, 1989. Vol. 3. Pp. 185, 186 (in Russ.).
- Vvedensky A. I. Psychology without any metaphysics. Petrograd, 1917 (in Russ.).
- Weideman A. V. Thinking and being (logic of sufficient reason). Riga, 1927. Pp. 274–279 (in Russ.).
- Hartman N. Ethics. SPb., 2002 (in Russ.).
- Hegel G. Philosophy of Law. M., 1990. P. 279 (in Russ.).
- Gessen S. I. Stages of the scientific course, or the theory of universities // Fundamentals of Pedagogy. Introduction to Applied Ethics. M., 1995. Pp. 310–327 (in Russ.).
- Zenkovsky V. V. History of Russian Philosophy: in 2 vols. L., 1991. Vol. 2, part 2. P. 155 (Philosophical Heritage of Russia) (in Russ.).
- Klyuchevsky V. O. Russian history. Full course of lectures: in 3 books. M., 1997. Book 2. Pp. 355, 357 (in Russ.).
- Kushner S. N. Ethical and legal teachings in Russian Neo-Kantianism (P. I. Novgorodtsev and B. A. Kistyakovsky) // Transcendental Journal. 2021. Vol. 2. Iss. 3 (in Russ.).
- Malinov A. V. Foundations of sociology (fragments of the course “Scientific foundations of sociology in their historical development”) // The sociological legacy of A. S. Lappo-Danilevsky: research and materials. SPb., 2017. Pp. 260–303 (in Russ.).
- Paliyenko N. I. The doctrine of the essence of law and the legal connectedness of the state. Kharkov, 1908. P. 321 (in Russ.).
- Rubinshtein M. M. An essay on pedagogical psychology in connection with general pedagogy. M., 1920. Pp. 9–37 (in Russ.).
- Solovyov V. S. Essays: in 2 vols. Vol. I / comp., general ed. and introductory articles by A. F. Losev and A. V. Gulyga; notes by S. L. Kravets et al. M., 1988. P. 549 (in Russ.).
- Frolova E. A. History of political and legal theories. M., 2025. Pp. 469–474 (in Russ.).
- Frolova E. A. Rational foundations of law: Classics and Modernity (Dedicated to the 270th anniversary of Lomonosov Moscow State University). M., 2023. P. 27 (in Russ.).
- Khokhlov S. V. I. Kant’s views on the problem of the relationship between morality and law as a source of V. S. Solovyov’s philosophical views // Herald of Herzen RSPU. 2009. No. 97. P. 164 (in Russ.).
- Belov V., Lebedeva A. Post-Neo-Kantianism and/or Transcendental Idealism // Filosofija, Sociologija. 2022. Vol. 33. No. 1. Pp. 57–64.
- Boch M. Transzendentalphilosophie und Post- Neukantianismus. Zur Kontinuität der Problemgeschichte der Transzendentalen Systematik im 20. Jahrhundert // RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2024. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 707.
- Ebert Th. Soziale Gerechtigkeit. Ideen, Geschichte, Kontroversen. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Schriftenreihe Band 1571. Bonn, 2015. S. 178, 179.
- Krijnen Ch. Phänomenologie oder Kritizismus? // Revista de Estudios Kantianos. 2019. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 194.
- Krings H. Transzendentale Logik. München. 1964. S. 38.
- Ollig H.-L. Der Neukantianismus. Stuttgart, 1979. S. 4, 94–110.
- Zeidler K. Kritische Dialektik und Transzendentalontologie. Der Ausgang des Neukantianismus und die post-neukantianische Systematik. Bonn, 1995. S. 22–31, 73.
Supplementary files
