Investigation of Factors Determining the Efficiency of Interaction of Aluminum Alloys Activated with the Ga–In Eutectic with Water in Hydrogen Cartridges

A. I. Nizovskii; Низовский А. И.; A. N. Shmakov; Шмаков А. Н.; A. V. Kulikov; Куликов А. В.; E. A. Suprun; Супрун Е. А.; V. I. Bukhtiyarov; Бухтияров В. И.

doi:10.31857/S102809602311016X

Investigation of Factors Determining the Efficiency of Interaction of Aluminum Alloys Activated with the Ga–In Eutectic with Water in Hydrogen Cartridges

Authors: Nizovskii A.I.¹, Shmakov A.N.¹^,2, Kulikov A.V.¹, Suprun E.A.¹, Bukhtiyarov V.I.¹
Affiliations:
1. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
2. SRF “SKIF”, Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
Issue: No 11 (2023)
Pages: 9-15
Section: Articles
URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1028-0960/article/view/232203
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S102809602311016X
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WMSITE
ID: 232203

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Using high-resolution X-ray diffraction and synchrotron radiation, as well as and scanning electron microscopy, it has been shown that the observed high reactivity of commercial aluminum alloys activated with the Ga–In eutectic is associated with the formation of the Al–Ga–In eutectic along grain boundaries in the entire material volume. The loss of material activity during storage under atmospheric conditions is due to the oxidation of the eutectic components. Activation with pure gallium leads to formation of AlGa_x solid solution, which has low activity in the reaction with water under neutral pH.

Keywords

high-resolution X-ray diffraction, synchrotron radiation, hydrogen energy, Ga–In eutectic, activated aluminum.

References

Deng Z.-Y., Ferreira J.M.F., Sakka Y. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008. V. 91. Iss. 12. P. 3825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02800.x
Wang H.Z., Leung D.Y.C., Leung M.K.H., Ni M. // Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2009. V. 13. Iss. 4. P. 845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.02.009
Sheindlin A.E., Zhuk A.Z. // Herald Russ. Academy Sci. 2010. V. 80. Iss. 2. P. 143. https://doi.org/10.1134/S101933161002005X
Sheindlin A.E., Zhuk A.Z. // Russ. J. General Chem. 2007. V. 77. P. 778. https://doi.org/10.1134/S107036320704038X
Shuo X.U., Jing L.I.U. // Front. Energy. 2019. V. 13. P. 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0603-x
Belitskus D. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 1970. V. 117. Iss. 8. P. 1097. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2407730
Kravchenko O.V., Semenenko K.N., Bulychev B.M., Kalmykov K.B. // J. Alloys Compd. 2005. V. 397. Iss. 1–2. P. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.11.065
Parmuzina A.V., Kravchenko O.V. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2008. V. 33. Iss. 12. P. 3073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.025
Du Preez S.P., Bessarabov D.G. // Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017. V. 12. Iss. 9. P. 8663. https://doi.org/10.20964/2017.09.22
Du B.D., Wang W., Chen W., Chen D.M., Yang K. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017. V. 42. Iss. 34. P. 21586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.105
Liang J., Gao L.J., Miao N.N., Chai Y.J., Wang N., Song X.Q. // Energy. 2016. V. 113. P. 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.013
Liu Y., Liu X., Chen X., Yang S., Wang C. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017. V. 42. Iss. 16. P. 10943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.205
Trenikhin M.V., Bubnov A.V., Nizovskii A.I., Duplyakin V.K. // Inorg. Mater. 2006. V. 42. Iss. 3. P. 256. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168506030083
Nizovskii A.I., Bukhtiyarov V.I., Veligzhanin A.A., Zubavichus Y.V., Murzin V.Y., Chernyshov A.A., Khlebnikov A.S., Senin R.A., Kazakov I.V., Vorobyov A.A. // Crystallogr. Rep. 2012. V. 57. Iss. 5. P. 693. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774512050112
Nizovskii A.I., Matvienko A.A., Rogozhnikov V.N., Tokarev M.M., Bukhtiyarov V.I. // Mater. Today: Proc. 2020. V. 25. Iss. 3. P. 505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.045
Wang H.Z., Leung D.Y.C., Leung M.K.H., Ni M. // Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2009. V. 13. Iss. 4. P. 845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.02.009
Wang W., Chen W., Zhao X.M., Chen D.M., Yang K. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2012. V. 37. Iss. 24. P. 18672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.164
Liang J., Gao L.J., Miao N.N., Chai Y.J., Wang N., Song X.Q. // Energy. 2016. V. 113. P. 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.013
Elitzur S., Rosenband V., Gany A. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2014. V. 39. Iss.12. P. 6328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.037
Nandakumar N., Arularasu M. // Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. (IRJET). 2015. V. 2. Iss. 6. P. 1245. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V2/i6/IRJET-V2I6187.pdf
Jayaraman K., Chauveau C., Gökalp I. // Energy Power Eng. 2015. V. 7. P. 426.
Liu S., Fan M.-Q., Wang C. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2012. V. 37. Iss. 1. P. 1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.029
Liu D., Gao Q., An Q. et al. // Crystals. 2020. V. 10. Iss. 3. P. 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10030167
Liu S., Fan M.-Q., Wang C. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2012. V. 37. Iss. 1. P. 1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.029
Шейндлин А.Е., Жук А.З. // Рос. хим. журн. 2006. Т. L. № 6. С. 105.
Rehbinder P.A., Shchukin E.D. // Progress Surf. Sci. 1972. V. 3. Iss. 2. P. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6816(72)90011-1
Nizovskii A.I., Kulikov A.V., Trenikhin M.V., Bukhtiyarov V.I. // Catal. Sustain. Energy. 2017. V. 4. Iss. 1. P. 62. https://doi.org/10.1515/cse-2017-0010
Hugo R.C., Hoagland R.G. // Acta Mater. 2000. V. 48. Iss. 8. P. 1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00463-2
Ziebarth J.T., Woodall J.M., Kramer R.A., Go C. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2011. V. 36. Iss. 9. P. 5271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.127
Мондольфо Л.Ф. Структура и свойства алюминиевых сплавов. М.: Металлургия, 1979. 640 с.