Comparative Analysis of Microbial Communities of Contrasting Soil Types in Different Plant Communities
- Authors: Ivanova E.A.1,2, Pershina E.V.1,3, Kutovaya O.V.2, Sergalieva N.K.1, Nagieva A.G.4, Zhiengaliev A.T.4, Provorov N.A.1, Andronov E.E.1,2,3
-
Affiliations:
- All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology
- Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
- St. Petersburg State University
- Zhangir khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University
- Issue: Vol 49, No 1 (2018)
- Pages: 30-39
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1067-4136/article/view/226528
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106741361801006X
- ID: 226528
Cite item
Abstract
Microbiomes were analyzed in samples of the major soil types of Russia and Western Kazakhstan region from different plant communities (fallow, forest, agrophytocenosis). The representatives of 42 bacterial and 2 archaeal phyla were identified in the samples, among which the dominant positions were occupied by representatives of ten phyla: nine bacterial (Actinobacteria (33.5%), Proteobacteria (28.4%), Acidobacteria (8.3%), Verrucomicrobia (7.7%), Bacteroidetes (4.2%), Chloroflexi (3.0%), Gemmatimonadetes (2.3%), Firmicutes (2.1%), Planctomycetes (2.0%)) and one archaeal Crenarchaeota (2.6%). Data analysis by the methods of multivariate statistics suggests that the taxonomic structure of microbiota is formed under the action of two main factors: the strongest factor is soil acidity, which determines the dynamics of the microbiome at the level of major taxa such as phylum, and the weaker factor is the type of vegetation, which determines the community structure at lower taxonomic level (order, family, genus). Detailed analysis of the samples of podzolic soil in Leningrad Region made it possible to identify bacterial taxa specifically associated both with the type of biome (fallow, forest, agrophytocenosis) and with the specific plant community (specific composition of plant synusia).
Keywords
About the authors
E. A. Ivanova
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology; Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Author for correspondence.
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 196608; Moscow, 119017
E. V. Pershina
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology; St. Petersburg State University
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 196608; St. Petersburg, 199034
O. V. Kutovaya
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119017
N. Kh. Sergalieva
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 196608
A. G. Nagieva
Zhangir khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Kazakhstan, Uralsk, West Kazakhstan Region, 090009
A. T. Zhiengaliev
Zhangir khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Kazakhstan, Uralsk, West Kazakhstan Region, 090009
N. A. Provorov
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 196608
E. E. Andronov
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology; Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; St. Petersburg State University
Email: ektrnivanova@gmail.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 196608; Moscow, 119017; St. Petersburg, 199034
Supplementary files
