Energy geodynamo parameters compatible with analytical, numerical, paleomagnetic models and observations

Abstract

A hydromagnetic dynamo is only possible at a sufficiently powerful convection. In the Earth’s core, it is probably the nonthermal convection very much in excess of its critical level with the molecular transporr coefficients. However, in the case of medium- or large-scale fields, the critical energy level caused by the turbulent tranport coefficients is likely to be slightly below the actual level. This probably explains both the 22-year success of this type of simplified geodynamo models and the energy scaling laws for hydromagnetic fields, which generalize these models. Also the review of energy-dependent analytical and observational estimates of vortex fields, hydromagnetic scale sizes, and velocities in the core is presented. These typical parameters are partly in a new way linked to the observed and more ancient magnetic variations. New, albeit, simplified and self-evident, substantiation is given to the paleomagnetic hypothesis about the predominance of the axial dipole under a certain time averaging. In (Pozzo et al., 2012) and more recent works, it is shown that the adiabatic heat flow and electrical conductivity in the Earth’s core are severalfold higher than the generally accepted estimates. Here, the dynamo supporting Braginsky’s convection (Braginsky, 1963) (under the crystallization of the heavy fraction of a liquid onto the solid core) started less than 1 Ga ago, whereas the more ancient geodynamo was supported by the compositional convection of another type. The known mechanisms implementing this convection, which differ by the scenarios of magnetic evolution, are reviewed. This may help identify the sought mechanism through the most ancient paleomagnetic estimates of the field’s intensity and through the numerical models. The probable mechanisms of generation and their absence for the primordial and recent magnetic field of the studied terrestrial planets are discussed.