Mineral CuFe2S4 from sulfide Copper–Nickel ores of the Lovnoozero deposit, Kola Peninsula
- Authors: Orsoev D.A.1, Kanakin S.V.1, Pakhomovsky Y.A.2, Ushchapovskaya Z.F.3, Reznitsky L.Z.3
-
Affiliations:
- Geological Institute, Siberian Branch
- Geological Institute, Kola Scientific Center
- Institute of the Earth’s Crust Siberian Branch
- Issue: Vol 58, No 7 (2016)
- Pages: 579-585
- Section: New Minerals
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1075-7015/article/view/215107
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701516070072
- ID: 215107
Cite item
Abstract
The unnamed mineral CuFe2S4 has been found from sulfide Cu–Ni ores of the Lovnoozero deposit in the Kola Peninsula, Russia. It occurs in norite composed of orthopyroxene (bronzite), Ca-rich plagioclase (66% An), pargasite, and phlogopite. The last two minerals are replaced by talc, chlorite and carbonates. Monoclinic pyrrhotite, pentlandite, chalcopyrite, and pyrite are associated ore minerals. Phase CuFe2S4 is enclosed predominantly in chalcopyrite, probably replacing it, and occurs in later carbonate veinlets together with redeposited sulfides. It is light yellow with a brownish tint and metallic luster. The Mohs hardness is 5–5.5; VHN 654 ± 86 kgs/mm2. Density (calc.) = 4.524 g/cm3. The mineral is anisotropic, internal reflections are absent. Reflectance values (λ, nm R′g and R′p %) are: 440 30.3 29.5, 500 43.7 42.8, 560 50.9 49.6, 620 52.4 51.2, 640 52.6 51.4, 680 52.8 51.6, 700 52.7 51.4. CuFe2S4 is monoclinic, a = 6.260(4), b = 5.39(1), c = 13.19(1) Å, β = 94.88(7)°, V = 443(1) Å3, Z = 4. The strongest reflections in the powder diffraction pattern are [d, Å (I) (hkl)]: 4.150 (10) (012), 3.559 (4) (\(11\bar 2\)), 3.020 (4) (\(10\bar 4\)), 2.560 (3) (\(21\bar 2\)), 2.500 (3) (\(10\bar 5\)), 2.340 (3) (\(12\bar 2\)), 1.817 (3) (215), 1.489 (3) (402). The chemical composition is as follows, wt %: 20.44 Cu, 35.85 Fe, 0.65 Ni, 0.14 Co, 43.15 S, total is 100.23. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 7 atoms is Cu0.969(Fe1.934Ni0.034Co0.007)1.975S4.056. According to its mode of occurrence, the mineral was formed as a result of low temperature processes involving metamorphic hydrothermal solutions.
About the authors
D. A. Orsoev
Geological Institute, Siberian Branch
Author for correspondence.
Email: magma@gin.bscnet.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Sakh’yanovoi 6a, Ulan-Ude, 670046
S. V. Kanakin
Geological Institute, Siberian Branch
Email: magma@gin.bscnet.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Sakh’yanovoi 6a, Ulan-Ude, 670046
Ya. A. Pakhomovsky
Geological Institute, Kola Scientific Center
Email: magma@gin.bscnet.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Fersmana 14, Murmansk oblast, Apatity, 184209
Z. F. Ushchapovskaya
Institute of the Earth’s Crust Siberian Branch
Email: magma@gin.bscnet.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Lermontova 128, Irkutsk, 664033
L. Z. Reznitsky
Institute of the Earth’s Crust Siberian Branch
Email: magma@gin.bscnet.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Lermontova 128, Irkutsk, 664033
Supplementary files
