Maintaining long-term outcomes after rehabilitation in stroke patients: literature review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The relevance of the stroke problem is determined by a significant increase in global morbidity and mortality, especially in developing regions of the world. Despite significant medical advances in recent decades, the burden of stroke continues to increase, posing a serious threat to the health of the planet’s population. Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability, having a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and the economy of countries. Over the past decades, a twofold increase in the number of cases of the disease has been noted, with the greatest number of fatalities and sufferers occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Separately, an alarming trend of increasing stroke rates among young population groups is emphasized, which indicates the need to expand preventive measures and improve the quality of specialized care. Russia also faces a high burden due to stroke: the annual number of new cases is increasing, and the mortality rate remains one of the highest among all diseases. The study confirms a significant difference in the incidence of strokes between men and women, reveals a high risk of early strokes in men and emphasizes the importance of taking into account the specifics of various population subgroups when developing a prevention and treatment strategy. International data confirm the trend of increasing strokes even in developed countries such as the United States and China, where there has been a significant increase in the number of fatalities and new cases. This circumstance requires the development of innovative approaches to the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of strokes, as well as intensified efforts to reduce lifestyle and environmental risks. Thus, the problem of combating stroke is of particular importance, since it affects almost all aspects of public health and has a significant impact on the development of national health systems.

About the authors

Almaz Kh. Islamgulov

Bashkir State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: aslmaz2000@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0567-7515
SPIN-code: 8701-3486

assistant

Russian Federation, 47 Zaki Validi st, Ufa, 450008

Robert R. Zinnatullin

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: robert_zinnatullin@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-3381-5446

student

Russian Federation, Ufa

Aiana A. Kabataeva

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: akabataeva01@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-9016-6444

student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Regina F. Khalikova

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: 89610492121@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-0027-3506

student

Russian Federation, Ufa

Vladislav A. Krasheninnikov

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: krashenvlad@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3478-7821

student

Russian Federation, Ufa

Askar N. Faritov

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: Faritov.askar@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1757-6471

student

Russian Federation, Ufa

Anastasia I. Sibikina

Ryazan State Medical University named after academician I.P. Pavlov

Email: aska906423@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-7738-0642

student

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Angelina M. Shekhtmester

Ryazan State Medical University named after academician I.P. Pavlov

Email: Angelina-mark33@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-9756-9291

student

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Shirvani R. Ramazanov

Dagestan State Medical University

Email: sirvaniramazanov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-1280-3341

student

Russian Federation, Makhachkala

Anastasia Narly

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University)

Email: nastya.narly@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-8295-787X

student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Patimat M. Tagirova

Dagestan State Medical University

Email: misspatya.02@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-1839-7952

student

Russian Federation, Makhachkala

Regina R. Akhmadieva

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: regina.ahmadieva.01@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-9545-4800

student

Russian Federation, Ufa

Diana S. Orlova

Rostov State Medical University

Email: diana_orlova18@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-2564-694X

student

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Irina V. Shakhnazarova

Rostov State Medical University

Email: shakhnazarova.02@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2511-0271

student

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
  2. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
  3. Scott CA, Li L, Rothwell PM. Diverging Temporal Trends in Stroke Incidence in Younger vs Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(10):1036–1048. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1520
  4. Ignatyeva VI, Voznyuk IA, Shamalov NA, et al. Social and economic burden of stroke in Russian Federation. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(8–2):5–15. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20231230825 EDN: QEIVCM
  5. Stakhovskaya LV, Klochikhina OA, Bogatyreva MD, Chugunova SA. Analysis of epidemiological indicators of recurrent strokes in the regions of the Russian Federation (based on the results of the territorial-population register 2009–2014). Consilium medicum. 2016;18(9):8–11. EDN: XYBMLD
  6. Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;149(8):e347–e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209
  7. Tu WJ, Zhao Z, Yin P, et al. Estimated Burden of Stroke in China in 2020. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(3):e231455. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1455
  8. Wafa HA, Wolfe CDA, Emmett E, et al. Burden of Stroke in Europe: Thirty-Year Projections of Incidence, Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years. Stroke. 2020;51(8):2418–2427. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029606
  9. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(4):394–398. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9
  10. Tanaka T, Hamaguchi T, Suzuki M, et al. Estimation of Motor Impairment and Usage of Upper Extremities during Daily Living Activities in Poststroke Hemiparesis Patients by Observation of Time Required to Accomplish Hand Dexterity Tasks. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9471921. doi: 10.1155/2019/9471921
  11. Lundström E, Smits A, Terént A, Borg J. Risk factors for stroke-related pain 1 year after first-ever stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(2):188–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02378.x
  12. Ringman JM, Saver JL, Woolson RF, Clarke WR, Adams HP. Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology. 2004;63(3):468–474. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000133011.10689.ce
  13. Medeiros GC, Roy D, Kontos N, Beach SR. Post-stroke depression: A 2020 updated review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020;66:70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.011
  14. Islamgulov AK, Pervakov MV, Fominova OO, et al. The role of rehabilitation aimed at improving bone function in cancer patients with bone tissue damage. Medical and Social Expert Evaluation and Rehabilitation. 2024;27(3):163–176. doi: 10.17816/MSER646532
  15. Teasell R, Rice D, Richardson M, et al. The next revolution in stroke care. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(11):1307–1314. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2014.968130
  16. Salbach NM, Mountain A, Lindsay MP, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Virtual Stroke Rehabilitation Interim Consensus Statement 2022. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(11):1076–1082. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002062
  17. Liao ZY, Haycock-Stuart E, Kean S. Biographical continuation: recovery of stroke survivors and their family caregivers in Taiwan. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024;25:e2. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000610
  18. Jee S, Jeong M, Paik NJ, et al. Early Supported Discharge and Transitional Care Management After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2022;13:755316. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.755316
  19. English C, Hill K, Cadilhac DA, et al. Living clinical guidelines for stroke: updates, challenges and opportunities. Med J Aust. 2022;216(10):510–514. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51520
  20. Kenah K, Tavener M, Bernhardt J, Spratt NJ, Janssen H. “Wasting time”: a qualitative study of stroke survivors’ experiences of boredom in non-therapy time during inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(13):2799–2807. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2230131
  21. Kutlubaev MA, Akhmetova AI, Ozerova AI. Emotional disorders after stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(12–2):30–35. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202312312230 EDN: ABNJKQ
  22. Kong Q, Wang J, Huang X, He J, Chang J. Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024;38(11–12):863–876. doi: 10.1177/15459683241274755
  23. Helbach J, Hoffmann F, Hecht N, et al. Information needs of people who have suffered a stroke or TIA and their preferred approaches of receiving health information: A scoping review. Eur Stroke J. 2024;10(1):23969873241272744. doi: 10.1177/23969873241272744
  24. Thompson S, Barber A, Fink J, et al. New Zealand hospital stroke service provision. N Z Med J. 2020;133(1526):18–30.
  25. Harwood MLN, Ranta A, Thompson SG, et al. Barriers to optimal stroke service care and solutions: a qualitative study engaging people with stroke and their whānau. N Z Med J. 2022;135(1556):81–93.
  26. Carey L, Walsh A, Adikari A, et al. Finding the Intersection of Neuroplasticity, Stroke Recovery, and Learning: Scope and Contributions to Stroke Rehabilitation. Neural Plast. 2019;2019:5232374. doi: 10.1155/2019/5232374
  27. Durand A, D’Amours L, Giroux A, et al. Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(10):jrm00113. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2746
  28. Kayes NM, Papadimitriou C. Reflecting on challenges and opportunities for the practice of person-centred rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2023;37(8):1026–1040. doi: 10.1177/02692155231152970
  29. Bright FAS, Ibell-Roberts C, Featherstone K, et al. “Physical well-being is our top priority”: Healthcare professionals’ challenges in supporting psychosocial well-being in stroke services. Health Expect. 2024;27(2):e14016. doi: 10.1111/hex.14016
  30. McNaughton H, Gommans J, McPherson K, Harwood M, Fu V. A cohesive, person-centric evidence-based model for successful rehabilitation after stroke and other disabling conditions. Clin Rehabil. 2023;37(7):975–985. doi: 10.1177/02692155221145433
  31. Egan MY, Laliberté-Rudman D, Rutkowski N, et al. The implications of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for design and allocation of rehabilitation after hospital discharge: a problematization. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(23):3403–3415. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1592244
  32. Mills JA, Cieza A, Short SD, Middleton JW. Development and Validation of the WHO Rehabilitation Competency Framework: A Mixed Methods Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(6):1113–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.129
  33. Lundquist CB, Nielsen JF, Arguissain FG, Brunner IC. Accuracy of the Upper Limb Prediction Algorithm PREP2 Applied 2 Weeks Poststroke: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(1):68–78. doi: 10.1177/1545968320971763
  34. Esenbaeva GT, Zhautikova SB, Mindubaeva FA, Kadyrova IA. A method for predicting probability of stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2014;114(3–2):51–54. EDN: SDIJOH
  35. Stinear CM, Smith MC, Byblow WD. Prediction Tools for Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke. 2019;50(11):3314–3322. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025696
  36. Hinckley J, Jayes M. Person-centered care for people with aphasia: tools for shared decision-making. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4:1236534. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1236534
  37. Bright FA, Kayes NM, Cummins C, Worrall LM, McPherson KM. Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(10):1396–1405. doi: 10.1177/0269215517694678
  38. Ranner M, Guidetti S, von Koch L, Tham K. Experiences of participating in a client-centred ADL intervention after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(25):3025-3033. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1483434
  39. Lens C, Demeestere J, Casolla B, et al. From guidelines to clinical practice in care for ischaemic stroke patients: A systematic review and expert opinion. Eur J Neurol. 2024;31(12):e16417. doi: 10.1111/ene.16417
  40. Chun HYY, Ford A, Kutlubaev MA, et al. Depression, anxiety, and suicide After stroke: A narrative review of the best available evidence. Stroke. 2022;53(4):1402–10. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035499
  41. de Graaf JA, Schepers VPM, Nijsse B, et al. The influence of psychological factors and mood on the course of participation up to four years after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(10):1855–1862. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1808089
  42. Guo Z, Zeng S, Ling K, et al. Experiences and needs of older patients with stroke in China involved in rehabilitation decision-making: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02735-5
  43. Kotov SV, Isakova EV, Sheregeshev VI. Possibility of treatment of emotional and behavioral disorders in patients with stroke during rehabilitation. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019;119(4):26–31. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201911904126 EDN: XFEZEB
  44. Heran M, Lindsay P, Gubitz G, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Acute Stroke Management, 7th Edition Practice Guidelines Update, 2022. Can J Neurol Sci. 2024;51(1):1–31. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2022.344
  45. Lu H, Tan X, Wang X, et al. Basic psychological needs satisfaction of stroke patients: a qualitative study. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01107-4
  46. Evans JJ. Positive psychology and brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Impair. 2011;12:117–27.
  47. Kidd L, Millar JD, Mason H, et al. Supported self-management in community stroke rehabilitation: what is it and how does it work? A protocol for a realist evaluation study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e055491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055491
  48. Duncan Millar J, Mason H, Kidd L; IMPETUS Research Team. What is important in supporting self-management in community stroke rehabilitation? A Q methodology study. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(14):2307–2315. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2087766
  49. Jones F, Pöstges H, Brimicombe L. Building Bridges between healthcare professionals, patients and families: A coproduced and integrated approach to self-management support in stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;39(4):471–480. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161379
  50. Rhoda A, Groenewald R, Altigani R, Jones F. Self-Management and Stroke. Self-Management Chronic Illness. Cham: Springer; 2021:63–73.
  51. Harwood M, Weatherall M, Talemaitoga A, et al. Taking charge after stroke: promoting self-directed rehabilitation to improve quality of life--a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(6):493–501. doi: 10.1177/0269215511426017
  52. Fu V, Weatherall M, McPherson K, et al. Taking Charge after Stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(9):954–964. doi: 10.1177/1747493020915144
  53. Gangwani R, Cain A, Collins A, Cassidy JM. Leveraging Factors of Self-Efficacy and Motivation to Optimize Stroke Recovery. Front Neurol. 2022;13:823202. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.823202
  54. Fu V, Fernando KM, Bright F, et al. Coming to my own wisdom: A qualitative study exploring the role of the Take Charge intervention in stroke recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2025;39(3):377–387. doi: 10.1177/02692155241310770
  55. May C, Bieber K, Chow D, Mortenson WB, Schmidt J. Experiences of adults with stroke attending a peer-led peer-support group. Brain Impair. 2023;24(3):443–455. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2023.3
  56. Wu D, Zhang H, Leng Y, et al. A bibliometric analysis of telerehabilitation services for patients with stroke. Front Neurol. 2023;13:1026867. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1026867
  57. Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1):CD010255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3
  58. Nikolaev VA. Telerehabilitation of stroke patients: current trends in the russian healthcare system. Healthcare Manager. 2022;(2):65–75. doi: 10.21045/1811-0185-2022-2-65-75 EDN: KXSWNB
  59. Nikolaev VA, Safonicheva OG, Nikolaev AA. SWOT analysis of telerehabilitation after stroke: synchronous format. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023;26(12):79–87. doi: 10.17116/profmed20232612179 EDN: ZBKEGY
  60. Aderinto N, Olatunji G, Abdulbasit MO, et al. Exploring the efficacy of virtual reality-based rehabilitation in stroke: a narrative review of current evidence. Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2285907. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2285907
  61. Hao J, He Z, Yu X, Remis A. Comparison of immersive and non-immersive virtual reality for upper extremity functional recovery in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2023;44(8):2679–2697. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06742-8
  62. Jarvis K, Thetford C, Turck E, Ogley K, Stockley RC. Understanding the Barriers and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology (DHT) Implementation in Neurological Rehabilitation: An Integrative Systematic Review. Health Serv Insights. 2024;17:11786329241229917. doi: 10.1177/11786329241229917
  63. Bally ELS, Cheng D, van Grieken A, et al. Patients’ Perspectives Regarding Digital Health Technology to Support Self-management and Improve Integrated Stroke Care: Qualitative Interview Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e42556. doi: 10.2196/42556
  64. Mou H, Lam SKK, Chien WT. Effects of a family-focused dyadic psychoeducational intervention for stroke survivors and their family caregivers: a pilot study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01145-0
  65. Choo PY, Shaik MA, Tan-Ho G, Lee J, Ho AHY. Living losses in stroke caregiving: A qualitative systematic review of systematic reviews on psycho-socio-emotional challenges and coping mechanisms. Int J Stroke. 2023;18(3):268–277. doi: 10.1177/17474930221104908
  66. Qureshi A, Hargest C, Swain N, Aldabe D, Hale L. Psychosocial interventions for building resilience of informal carers of people living with stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(9):1419–1432. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2063419
  67. Willen SS, Williamson AF, Walsh CC, Hyman M, Tootle W. Rethinking flourishing: Critical insights and qualitative perspectives from the U.S. Midwest. SSM Ment Health. 2022;2:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100057
  68. Skolarus LE, Sharrief A, Gardener H, Jenkins C, Boden-Albala B. Considerations in Addressing Social Determinants of Health to Reduce Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Outcomes in the United States. Stroke. 2020;51(11):3433–3439. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030426
  69. Levine DA, Duncan PW, Nguyen-Huynh MN, Ogedegbe OG. Interventions Targeting Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Prevention and Treatment. Stroke. 2020;51(11):3425–3432. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030427
  70. Evans E, Jacobs M, Ellis C. The Intersection of Social Determinants of Health and Post-stroke Aphasia Outcomes: A Need for Intersectional Analysis. Semin Speech Lang. 2024;45(1):84–98. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1774783
  71. Kuznetsova NV, Ivanova EN. Cultural characteristics and ethnic identity as a factor in the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients with cerebrovascular diseases. Bulletin of the North-Eastern Federal University. 2022;19(4):45–52.
  72. Brewer KM, Taki TW, Heays G, Purdy SC. Tino rangatiratanga — a rural Māori community’s response to stroke: “I’m an invalid but I’m not invalid”. J R Soc N Z. 2022;53(3):381–394. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2132964
  73. Lin I, Coffin J, Bullen J, Barnabe C. Opportunities and challenges for physical rehabilitation with indigenous populations. Pain Rep. 2020;5(5):e838. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000838
  74. Cochrane F, Singleton-Bray J, Canendo W, Cornwell P, Siyambalapitiya S. “Working together… I can’t stress how important it is”: Indigenous Health Liaison Officers’ insights into working with speech-language pathologists and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with stroke and TBI. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024;26(2):149–161. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2023.2181225
  75. Newport R, Grey C, Dicker B, et al. Upholding te mana o te wā: Māori patients and their families’ experiences of accessing care following an out-of-hospital cardiac event. Am Heart J Plus. 2023;36:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100341
  76. . Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, et al. Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health (The Lancet —Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. Lancet. 2016;388(10040):131–157. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00345-7
  77. Gone JP. Redressing First Nations historical trauma: theorizing mechanisms for indigenous culture as mental health treatment. Transcult Psychiatry. 2013;50(5):683–706. doi: 10.1177/1363461513487669
  78. Firestone M, McConkey S, Beaudoin E, Bourgeois C, Smylie J. Mental health and cultural continuity among an urban Indigenous population in Toronto, Canada. Can J Public Health. 2024;115(2):263–272. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00709-6

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The algorithm for selecting primary sources.

Download (251KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector



Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».