Reproductive decisions in family: abortion, contraception, IVF
- Authors: Rusanova N.E.1, Erofeeva L.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of the FCTAS RAS
- Moscow University for Industry and Finance «Sinergy»
- Issue: Vol 27, No S1 (2024)
- Pages: 120-131
- Section: YOUTH’S ATTITUDE TO FAMILY AND CHILDREN
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1561-7785/article/view/272826
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-S1-120-131
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MKZIDX
- ID: 272826
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
About the authors
Nina E. Rusanova
Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of the FCTAS RAS
Email: ner238@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1859-2345
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher Moscow, Russia
Lubov V. Erofeeva
Moscow University for Industry and Finance «Sinergy»
Email: LVErofeeva@synergy.ru
Senior Lecturer Moscow, Russia
References
- Heinemann, K. Attitudes toward male fertility control: results of a multinational survey on four continents. / K. Heinemann, F. Saad, M. Wiesemes, S. White, L. Heinemann // Human Reproduction. — 2005. — Vol. 20. — No. 2. — P. 549–556.
- Martin, C. W. Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: cross-cultural implications for development of novel preparations. / C. W. Martin, R. A. Anderson, L. Cheng [и др.] // Human Reproduction. — 2000. — Vol. 15. — No. 3. — P. 637–645. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.637
- Griffin, T. How little is enough? The evidence for post-vasectomy testing. / T. Griffin, R. Tooher, K. Nowakowski, M. Lloyd, G. J. Maddern // The Journal of Urology. — 2005. — Vol. 174. — No. 1. — P. 29–36. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161595.82642.fc
- Sharma, V. Vasectomy demographics and postvasectomy desire for future children: results from a contemporary national survey. / V. Sharma, B. V. Le, K. R. Sheth [и др.] // Fertility and Sterility. — 2013. — Vol. 99. — No. 7. — P. 1880–1885.
- Hsieh, M. H. Markov modeling of vasectomy reversal and ART for infertility: how do obstructive interval and female partner age influence cost effectiveness? / M. H. Hsieh, M. V. Meng, P. J. Turek // Fertility and Sterility. — 2007. — Vol. 88. — No. 4. — P. 840–846. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.199
- Meng, M. V. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. / M. V. Meng, K. L. Greene, P. J. Turek // The Journal of Urology. — 2005. — Vol. 174. — No. 5. — P. 1926–1931. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000176736.74328.1a
- Gerrard, E. R. Jr. Effect of female partner age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal. / E. R. Jr. Gerrard, J. I. Sandlow, R. A. Oster [и др.] // Fertility and Sterility. — 2007. — Vol. 87. — No. 6. — P. 1340–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.038
- Wang, C. Progress in male contraception: A brief summary of the Third International Congress on Male Contraception, May 2022. / C. Wang, D. Blithe, S. Page, D. Serfaty, R. Sitruk Ware // Аndrology. — 2022. — Vol. 10. — No. 8. — P. 1460–1462. doi: 10.1111/andr.13261
- Шереметьева, Е. В. Индивидуальное консультирование молодых женщин по вопросам контрацепции в реальной клинической практике / Е. В. Шереметьева, Е. Н. Андреева // Проблемы репродукции. — 2022. — Т. 28. — № 4. — С. 89–96. doi: 10.17116/repro20222804189; EDN: DYDXON
- Marshall, C. Young Women’s Contraceptive Decision Making: Do Preferences for Contraceptive Attributes Align with Method Choice? / C. Marshall, S. Guendelman, J. Mauldon, A. Nuru-Jeter // Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. — 2016. — Vol. 48. — No. 3. — P. 119–127. doi: 10.1363/48e10116
- Армашевская, О. В. Современные приоритеты контрацептивного поведения российских женщин трудоспособного возраста (по данным выборочного исследования) / О. В. Армашевская, Т. А. Соколовская, А. Ш. Сененко // Акушерство и гинекология. — 2021 — № 1. — С. 164–169. doi: 10.18565/aig.2021.l.164-169; EDN: IPBJBZ
- Barnett, C. Unintended pregnancy rates differ according to combined oral contraceptive — results from the INAS-SCORE study. / C. Barnett, J. Dinger, T. D. Minh, K. Heinemann // The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. — 2019. — Vol. 24. — No. 4. — P. 247–250. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1629412
- Dinger, J. Impact of estrogen type on cardiovascular safety of combined oral contraceptives. / J. Dinger, T. Do Minh, K. Heinemann // Contraception. — 2016. — Vol. 94. — No. 4. — P. 328–339. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.010
- Wang, C. Hormonal approaches to male contraception / C. Wang, R. S. Swerdloff // Current Opinion of Urology. — 2010. — Vol. 20. — No. 6. — P. 520–524. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833f1b4a
- Nieschlag, E. The struggle for male hormonal contraception / E. Nieschlag // Best Practice and Research. Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. — 2011. — Vol. 25. — No. 2. — P. 369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.08.008
- Zhang, L. The acceptability of an injectable, once-a-month male contraceptive in China / L. Zhang, L. H. Shah, Y. Liu, K. M. Vogelsong // Contraception. — 2006. — Vol. 73. — No. 5. — P. 548–553.
- Martin, C. W. Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: cross-cultural implications for development of novel preparations / C. W. Martin, R. A. Anderson, L. Cheng [и др.] // Human Reproduction. — 2000. — Vol. 15. — No. 3. — P. 637–645. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.637
Supplementary files
