Email this article HEMODYNAMIC EFFICACY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF CRURAL MUSCLES
- Authors: Laberko L.A1, Barinov V.E1, Lobastov K.V1, Barmotin N.A2
-
Affiliations:
- РНИМУ им. Пирогова
- Городская клиническая больница № 13, Москва
- Issue: Vol 11, No 6 (2012)
- Pages: 12-15
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1681-3456/article/view/41303
- ID: 41303
Cite item
Abstract
Ultrasound duplex angioscanning with colour mapping of the blood low and construction of the Doppler curve were employed to study characteristics of regional venous hemodynamics in the popliteal vein during active muscle contraction (AMC)/relaxation and electromyostimulation (EMS) of crural muscles using a Veinoplus device. It was shown that peak blood flow velocity at rest equaled 15.9 cm/s and substantially increased by 3.5 and 4.8 times in case of AMC and EMS respectively. The volumetric blood flow at rest was 223 ml/min and increased by 1.6 and 1.2 times in case of AMC and EMS respectively (the difference is significant). Scanning of sural sinuses revealed a decrease of their diameter up to complete occlusion under effect of AMC. Regression analysis showed that the hemodynamic response to EMS depends largely on anatomic features of crural muscles but not their functional state.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
L. A Laberko
РНИМУ им. Пирогова
Email: laberko@list.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф. каф. общей хирургии лечебного факультета
V. E Barinov
РНИМУ им. Пирогова
K. V Lobastov
РНИМУ им. Пирогова
N. A Barmotin
Городская клиническая больница № 13, Москва
References
- Лаберко Л. А., Баринов В. Е., Лобастое К. В. и др. // Физиотер., бальнеол. и реабил. - 2012. - № 1. - С. 13-17.
- Broderick B. J., O’Briain D. E., Breen P. P. et al. // Med. Engineer. Phys. - 2010. - Vol. 32, N 4. - P. 349-355.
- Clarke Moloney M., Lyons G. M., Breen P. et al. // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 31. - P. 300-305.
- Faghri P. D., Van Meerdervort H. F., Glaser R. M., Figoni S. F. // EEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. - 1997. - Vol. 5, N 1. - P. 62-69.
- Griffin M., Nicolaides A. N., Bond D. et al. // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. - 2010. - Vol. 40, N 6. - P. 766-771.
- Janssen T. W., Hopman M. T. // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. - 2003. -Vol. 84, N 7. - P. 982-987.
- Laverick M. D., McGivern R. C., Crone M. D., Mollan R. A. B. // Phlebology. - 1990. - Vol. 5. - P. 285-290.
- Lindström B., Holmdahl C., Jonsson O. et al. // Br. J. Surg. - 1982. -Vol. 69, N 11. - P. 633-637.
- Lyons G. M., Leane G. E., Grace P. A. // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. - 2002. - Vol. 23, N 6. - P. 564-566.
- Nicolaides N., Kakkar V. V., Field E. S., Fish P. // Br. Med. J. - 1972. - Vol. 3, N 5829. - P. 756-758.
- Papaioannou T. G., Stefanadis C. // Hellenic. J. Cardiol. - 2005. -Vol. 46, N 1. - P. 9-15.
- Reed B. // Pediatr. Phys. Ther. - 1997. - Vol. 9. - P. 96-102.
Supplementary files
