Potential Applications of Directed Acyclic Graphs in the Design and Interpretation of Biomedical Research
- Authors: Krieger E.A.1, Postoev V.A.1, Kudryavtsev A.V.1, Unguryanu T.N.1, Grjibovski A.M.1,2,3
-
Affiliations:
- Northern State Medical University
- North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov
- Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
- Issue: Vol 32, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 300-314
- Section: REVIEWS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1728-0869/article/view/314590
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco683466
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MXPLRC
- ID: 314590
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article presents an algorithm for constructing and applying directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in the planning of epidemiological and biomedical studies. DAGs are graphical tools for modeling complex relationships between variables, which is particularly relevant in biomedical science, where accurate assessment of causal relationships requires accounting for potential confounding factors. The importance of DAGs is emphasized for conceptualizing scientific hypotheses and understanding the structure of relationships between factors based on scientific data review and findings from previous studies. The use of DAGs enhances the quality of both study design and data analysis, providing a more grounded approach to selecting variables for inclusion in statistical models. DAGs make it possible to determine the minimal and sufficient set of factors for adjustment, with consideration of the roles of variables (confounders, mediators, colliders) in relation to the exposure (a probable risk factor) and the outcome (a disease or condition), thus reducing the likelihood of analytical errors. The article highlights the practical application of DAGs using available software and provides specific examples of their use in biomedical research. Finally, recommendations are offered for integrating DAGs into biomedical research practice, which may contribute to the broader adoption of modern multivariate statistical methods, improved interpretability, and enhanced reproducibility of scientific findings.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ekaterina A. Krieger
Northern State Medical University
Email: kate-krieger@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5179-5737
SPIN-code: 2686-7226
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), PhD, Associate Professor
Russian Federation, ArkhangelskVitaly A. Postoev
Northern State Medical University
Email: ispha@nsmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4982-4169
SPIN-code: 6070-2486
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), PhD, Associate Professor
Russian Federation, ArkhangelskAlexander V. Kudryavtsev
Northern State Medical University
Email: ispha09@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8902-8947
SPIN-code: 9296-2930
PhD
Russian Federation, ArkhangelskTatiana N. Unguryanu
Northern State Medical University
Email: unguryanu_tn@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8936-7324
SPIN-code: 7358-1674
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), PhD, Associate Professor
Russian Federation, ArkhangelskAndrey M. Grjibovski
Northern State Medical University; North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov; Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Author for correspondence.
Email: andrej.grjibovski@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5464-0498
SPIN-code: 5118-0081
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, Arkhangelsk; Yakutsk; ArkhangelskReferences
- Mitkin NA, Drachev SN, Krieger EA, et al. Sample size calculation for cross-sectional studies. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2023;30(7):509–522. doi: 10.17816/humeco569406 EDN: LOEJVM
- Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10(1):37–48.
- Shrier I, Platt RW. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-70
- VanderWeele TJ. Principles of confounder selection. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):211–219. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6
- Foraita R, Spallek J, Zeeb H. Directed acyclic graphs. In: Ahrens W, Pigeot I, editors. Handbook of Epidemiology. New York: Springer; 2014. P. 1481–1517. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09834-0_65
- Kornaropoulos EM, Tollis IG, DAG View: an approach for visualizing large graphs. In: Didimo W, Patrignani M, editors. Graph Drawing. GD 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 7704. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2013. P. 499–510. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-36763-2_44
- Textor J, Zander BVD, Gilthorpe MS, et al. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(6):1887–1894. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw341
- Porta MS, Greenland S, Hernánet M, et al. A dictionary of epidemiology. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. 343 p.
- Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics. 4th ed. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC; 2018. 489 p.
- Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, et al. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-3-17
- Textor J, Liśkiewicz M. Adjustment criteria in causal diagrams: an algorithmic perspective. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Barcelona, Spain: AUAI Press; 2011. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1202.3764
- Lee PH. Is a cutoff of 10% appropriate for the change-in-estimate criterion of confounder identification? J Epidemiol. 2014;24(2):161–167. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20130062
- Heinze G, Wallisch C, Dunkler D. Variable selection — A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biom J. 2018;60(3):431–449. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700067
- Bailey LC, Forrest CB, Zhang P, et al. Association of antibiotics in infancy with early childhood obesity. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(11):1063–1069. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1539
- Li DK, Chen H, Ferber J, et al. Infection and antibiotic use in infancy and risk of childhood obesity: a longitudinal birth cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(1):18–25. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30281-9
- Dekkers OM, Laugesen K, Groenwold RHH. Directed acyclic graphs in clinical research. Eur J Endocrinol. 2024;190(4):E5–E7.
- Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020;584(7821):430–436. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4
- Sattar N, McInnes IB, McMurray JJV. Obesity is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 infection: multiple potential mechanisms. Circulation. 2020;142(1):4–6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047659
- Hamer M, Kivimäki M, Gale CR, Batty GD. Lifestyle risk factors, inflammatory mechanisms, and COVID-19 hospitalization: A community-based cohort study of 387,109 adults in UK. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:184–187. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.059
- Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):e21. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8
- Griffith GJ, Morris TT, Tudball MJ, et al. Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5749. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19478-2
- Lash MP, Fink AK. Applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiologic data. New York: Springer; 2011. 192 р.
Supplementary files
