1970–2020年全球恐怖活动分析
- 作者: Evdokimov V.I.1, Chernov K.A.2, Shulenin N.S.3
-
隶属关系:
- Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine
- Civil Defense Academy of the EMERCOM of Russia
- Saint Petersburg Medico-Social Institute
- 期: 卷 31, 编号 3 (2024)
- 页面: 191-199
- 栏目: ORIGINAL STUDY ARTICLES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1728-0869/article/view/316091
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco629531
- ID: 316091
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
背景。近年来,武装冲突、恐怖袭击(ТА)及其对医疗和生物方面的后果数量不断增加。
研究目的。分析1970年至2020年全球恐怖活动的指标,以优化反恐措施的实施。
材料和方法。研究对象为全球恐怖主义数据库(Global Terrorism Database, GTD)中的指标。计算了每百万人口中在恐怖袭击中死亡和受伤的个体风险,结果以均值、中位数、四分位数(Me [Q25; Q75])表示。
结果。在51年内(1970–2020年),全球发生了约21.5万起恐怖袭击,造成49.85万人死亡,59.78万人受伤。恐怖活动的年均发生率为4200起(3100 [1400; 4800] 起),年均死亡人数为9600人(7100 [4400; 10300] 人),年均受伤人数为11700人(7600 [3600; 15900] 人)。对恐怖袭击按世界地区、类型、使用的武器及目标进行了分析。全球人口在排除恐怖分子的情况下,个体死亡风险为1.25×10–6(1.16 [0.64; 1.73]×10–6)/(人年),受伤风险为1.71×10–6(1.32 [0.80; 2.28]×10–6)/(人年)。风险呈现增长趋势。
结论。在恐怖袭击中最常使用的是爆炸物和火器,因此预防人员伤亡极为困难。约一半的恐怖袭击没有导致医疗生物后果,但恐怖活动中的死亡风险依然存在。尽管完全消除恐怖主义的可能性较低,但通过反恐措施可以将其影响降至最低。
作者简介
Vladimir I. Evdokimov
Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: 9334616@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0771-2102
SPIN 代码: 1692-4593
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgKirill A. Chernov
Civil Defense Academy of the EMERCOM of Russia
Email: kchernovmd@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7625-4432
SPIN 代码: 9224-7846
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, KhimkiNikolay S. Shulenin
Saint Petersburg Medico-Social Institute
Email: shulenin.ns@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-4567-9279
SPIN 代码: 3497-2982
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg参考
- Acosta B, Ramos K. Introducing the 1993 terrorism and political violence dataset. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 2016;40(3): 1–34. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2016.1184061
- GTD Global Terrorism Database. Codebook: methodology, inclusion criteria, and variables. College Park: START; 2021.
- Miller E, Wingenroth B. Global Terrorism Database: real-time data collection pilot evaluation. College Park: START; 2023.
- Ryazanov DS, Okhrimenko AV. Use of electronic data bases in investigation of terrorism. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2015;(11-2):172–176. EDN: UMESVJ
- Besenyő J, Barten DG, De Cauwer HG, et al. Review of ambulance terrorism on the African continent. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023;38(2):237–242. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23000213
- Cavaliere GA, Alfalasi R, Jasani GN, et al. Terrorist attacks against healthcare facilities: a review. Health Secur. 2021;19(5):546–550. doi: 10.1089/ hs.2021.0004
- Hoth P, Roth J, Bieler D, et al. Education and training as a key enabler of successful patient care in mass-casualty terrorist incidents. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023;49(2):595–605. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02232-w
- Wirken B, Barten DG, De Cauwer H et al Primary care as primary target: a review of terrorist attacks against primary care providers and their offices. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022;37(4):451–454. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000954
- Grjibovski AM, Unguryanu TN. Analysis of biomedical data using a statistical software package SPSS. Arkhangelsk: Izd-vo SGMU; 2017. EDN: YQUSOF
- Kholmatova KK, Grjibovski AM. Panel- and trend studies in medicine and public health. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2016;(10):57–63. EDN: WQSIDR doi: 10.33396/1728-0869-2016-9-57-64
补充文件
