Email this article Indices for complete dentures after cleaning at home
- Authors: Serebrov K.D.1, Razumova S.N.1, Brago A.S.1, Serebrov D.V.1, Manvelyan A.S.1, Guryeva Z.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
- Issue: Vol 28, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 383-391
- Section: Clinical Investigation
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1728-2802/article/view/281603
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent623350
- ID: 281603
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
Background: According to experts, there are more than 350 million fully edentulous patients globally, accounting for 7% of the world population. Edentulous patients require dentures to maintain a good quality of life. Complete dentures need to be cleaned on a regular basis to prevent their microbial contamination and inflammatory complications.
Aim: To assess the efficacy of Anolit ANK Super solution for cleaning complete dentures at home.
Materials and Methods: The hygiene of complete dentures was assessed using the Ulitovsky–Leontiev index. The efficacy of cleaning complete dentures with Anolit ANK Super solution compared to 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate solution was assessed.
Moreover, statistical analysis methods were used: normality test; threshold value, or baseline significance level p=0.05; intragroup comparison (6 comparisons) with the Bonferroni correction (critical p=0.0083).
Results: When assessing the hygiene of dentures using the Ulitovsky–Leontiev index, the denture cleanliness index (DCI) changed from 4.65 points (poor denture hygiene) to 3.50 points (satisfactory denture hygiene) after one month of using Anolit ANK Super solution. After three months of using Anolit ANK Super solution, the DCI changed from 3.50 points (satisfactory denture hygiene) to 2.60 points (good denture hygiene). After six months of using Anolit ANK Super solution, the DCI changed from 2.60 points (good denture hygiene) to 1.55 points (very good denture hygiene).
After one month of using 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate solution, the DCI changed from 4.85 points (poor denture hygiene) to 4.40 points (poor denture hygiene) (p=0.0083). After three months of using 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate solution, the DCI changed from 4.40 points (poor denture hygiene) to 3.50 points (satisfactory denture hygiene) (p=0.0083). After six months of using 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate solution, the DCI changed from 3.50 points (satisfactory denture hygiene) to 2.60 points (good denture hygiene) (p=0.0083).
Conclusion: The follow-up revealed that, with similar duration of exposure to test solutions, Anolit ANK Super solution for cleaning dentures at home used for 6 months decreased the DCI threefold from baseline (p=0.000002) and improved denture hygiene from poor to good.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Kirill D. Serebrov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Author for correspondence.
Email: k.serebrov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0353-1339
SPIN-code: 8649-7284
Russian Federation, Moscow
Svetlana N. Razumova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Email: razumova-sn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3211-1357
SPIN-code: 6771-8507
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowAngela S. Brago
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Email: anzhela_bogdan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8826-470X
SPIN-code: 2437-8867
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowDmitrii V. Serebrov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Email: dserebrov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1030-1603
SPIN-code: 2161-9997
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowAshot S. Manvelyan
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Email: manvelyan-as@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5769-3843
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowZoya A. Guryeva
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Email: guryeva-za@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1384-8284
SPIN-code: 1368-4020
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Global burden of disease 2019 (GBD 2019) results [Internet]. Seattle: Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. (IHME); 2020. Available from: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2019
- Draft global strategy on oral health. In: Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 22–28 May 2022. Provisional agenda item 14.1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
- World population prospects 2019. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population. Division; 2022.
- Kunin VA, Duev RM, Sidorov Ya.Yu. The state of oral hygiene and denture using various hygiene products. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2015;22(2):77–82. EDN: UCHQUT doi: 10.12737/11840
- Coco BJ, Bagg J, Cross LJ, et al. Mixed Candida albicans and Candida glabrata populations associated with the pathogenesis of denture stomatitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008;23(5):377–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00439.x
- Offenbacher S, Barros SP, Bencharit S, et al. Differential mucosal gene expression patterns in Сandida-associated, chronic oral denture stomatitis. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):202–208. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13007
- Perić M, Živković R, Milić Lemić A, et al. The severity of denture stomatitis as related to risk factors and different Candida spp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.03.003
- Rajendran R, Sherry L, Nile CJ, et al. Biofilm formation is a risk factor for mortality in patients with Candida albicans bloodstream infection — Scotland, 2012–2013. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(1):87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.018
- Sherry L, Kean R, McKloud E, et al. Biofilms formed by isolates from recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis patients are heterogeneous and insensitive to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(9):e01065–17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01065-17
- Nunes ÉM, Policastro VB, Scavassin PM, et al. Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(4):462–468. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004
- O’Donnell LE, Robertson D, Nile CJ, et al. The oral microbiome of denture wearers is influenced by levels of natural dentition. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137717
- Shi B, Wu T, McLean J, et al. The denture-associated oral microbiome in health and stomatitis. mSphere. 2016;1(6):e00215–16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00215-16
- Mantzourani M, Gilbert SC, Fenlon M, Beighton D. Non-oral bifidobacteria and the aciduric microbiota of the denture plaque biofilm. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2010;25(3):190–199. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2009.00565.x
- Sachdeo A, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Biofilms in the edentulous oral cavity. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(5):348–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00301.x
- Ramage G, O’Donnell L, Sherry L, et al. Impact of frequency of denture cleaning on microbial and clinical parameters — a bench to chairside approach. J Oral Microbiol. 2018;11(1):1538437. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2018.1538437
- Ulitovsky S.B. Hygiene in dental prosthetics. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2009. 112 p. (In Russ.).
- Razumova SN, Brago AS, Razumov NM, et al. Methods of cleaning removable dentures. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2023;27(4):335–345. EDN: DQQMAC doi: 10.17816/dent409739
- Kalivradzhiyan EС, Golubeva LN, Golubev NА, et al. Сlinical and laboratory assessment of hygienic and microbiological effectiveness of the solution for cleaning and disinfection removable denture. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2013;(1):44. EDN: RSTTTR
- Chirkova NV, Vecherkina ZhV, Shalimova NA, et al. Analysis of the study of the index of assessment of the hygienic condition of removable dentures DHI. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2023;30(1):46–51. EDN: WYMGMJ doi: 10.24412/1609-2163-2023-1-46-51
- Mylonas P, Attrill DC, Walmsley AD. Evaluating denture cleanliness of patients in a regional dental hospital. Br Dent J. 2016;221(3):127–130. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.562
- Mylonas P, Milward P, McAndrew R. Denture cleanliness and hygiene: an overview. Br Dent J. 2022;233(1):20–26. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4397-1
Supplementary files
