电邮这篇文章 The success of treatment and survival of dental implants in different approaches to the treatment of patients using dental implants in conditions of limited bone volume
- 作者: Tsitsiashvili A.M.1, Panin A.M.1, Volosova E.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
- 期: 卷 24, 编号 1 (2020)
- 页面: 32-38
- 栏目: Clinical Investigation
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1728-2802/article/view/42314
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18821/1728-2802-2020-24-1-32-38
- ID: 42314
如何引用文章
开放存取
##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
订阅存取
详细
The article presents the results of the analysis of the success of treatment and survival of dental implants in the treatment of patients with bone deficiency in the framework of multi-stage and single-stage approaches for bone grafting operations using standard-sized dental implants and in the framework of the approach using narrow/short dental implants without bone augmentation surgery. Based on the results obtained, the degree of expediency (p<0.05) of choosing an approach to treatment can be selected depending on the type, location of the defect and the number of missing teeth.
作者简介
A. Tsitsiashvili
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: amc777@yandex.ru
candidate medical sciences
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowA. Panin
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Email: amc777@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
E. Volosova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Email: amc777@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
参考
- Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 7: CD003815.
- Chiapasco M. Failures in jaw reconstructive surgery with autogenous onlay bone grafts for pre-implant purposes: incidence, prevention and management of complications. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2011; 23(1): 1—15.
- Shi J.Y., Xu F.Y., Zhuang L.F., Gu Y.X., Qiao S.C., Lai H.C. Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up. Clin. Oral Implants. 2018; 29(1): 76—81.
- Anitua E., Alkhraist M.H., Piñas L., Begoña L., Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed den-ture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2014; 29: 682—9.
- Салеева Г.Т. Результаты корреляционного анализа различных методов аугментации альвеолярных отделов челюстей. Российский вестник дентальной имплантологии. 2015; 1(31): 65—8.
- Romeo E., Storelli S., Casano G., Scanferla M., Botticelli D. Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014; 7(4): 371—81.
- Felice P., Cannizzaro G., Barausse C., Pistilli R., Esposito M. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014; 7(4): 359—69.
补充文件
