Email this article THE PROBLEMS OF ORGAN DONORSHIP AND TRANSPLANTATION IN RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE SOCIAL NETWORKS
- Authors: Romanov S.V1, Abaeva O.P2
-
Affiliations:
- The Federal Budget Health Care Institution The Privolzhskiy Okrug Medical Center. of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
- The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education The I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. of Minzdrav of Russia
- Issue: Vol 18, No 1 (2019)
- Pages: 24-27
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1728-2810/article/view/44190
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18821/1728-2810-2019-18-1-24-27
- ID: 44190
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article considers issue of attitude of population of Russia to programs of donorship and transplantation of human organs. The content analysis was applied to messages about transplants of human organs in Russian-language social networks for one month of 2019. The attitude of Russian-speaking net surfers to this problem turned out to be as disinterested and neutral one. Only 11.5% of all messages were emotionally negative due to issues of insecurity of postmortem donorship of organs. The emphasis is made on necessity of more active promotion of humanity of work of transplantologists.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
S. V Romanov
The Federal Budget Health Care Institution The Privolzhskiy Okrug Medical Center. of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia603001, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
O. P Abaeva
The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education The I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. of Minzdrav of Russia
Email: abaevaop@inbox.ru
doctor of medical sciences, associate professor, professor of the Chair of Sociology of Medicine, Health Economics and Medical Insurance of Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «The I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University» of Minzdrav of Russia 119991, Moscow, Russia
References
- Rithalia A., McDaid C, Suekarran S., Myers L., Sowden A. Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: a systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2009; 338: а3162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3162 PMID: 19147479
- Boratyńska М., Patrzałek D. Transplantology: Challenges for Today. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentali. 2016; 64(1): 37-45. doi: 10.1007/s00005-016-0439-1
- Tasaki M., Saito K., Nakagawa Y., Ikeda M., Imai N., Ito Y. 20-Year Analysis of Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center in Japan. Transplantation Proceedings. 2014; 46: 437-41 doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.10.052.
- Fortin M.-C., Buchman D., Wright L., Chandler J., Delaney S., Fairhead T., Gallaher R. Public Solicitation of Anonymous Organ Donors: A Position Paper by the Canadian Society of Transplantation. Transplantation. 2017; 101(1): 17-20 doi: 10.1097/TP.000000000000151
- Murphy P.G., Smith M. Towards a framework for organ donation in the UK. British Journal of Anaesthesiа. 2012; 108 (1): i56-i67. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer402
- Kiani M., Abbasi M., Ahmadi M., Salehi B. Organ Transplantation in Iran; Current State and Challenges with a View on Ethical Consideration. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018; 7(3):45. doi: 10.3390/jcm7030045
- Донорство и пересадка органов в общественном мнении россиян. Трансплантология. 2014;(1):8-19.
- Fox C.S., Barry K., Colbert J. Importance of social media alongside traditional medical publications. Circulation. 2016; 133: 1978-83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020303
- Baan C.C., Dor F.J. The Transplantation Journal on Social Media: The @TransplantJrnl Journey From Impact Factor to Klout Score. Transplantation. 2017;101(1): 8-10 doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001581
- Johnson Ch.L., Hutchinson J.A. Promote Your Work in Transplantation. Transplantation. 2017; 101(7): 1512-3 doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001741
Supplementary files
