Three-trocar partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma compared with the standard four-trocar technique: a prospective cohort study
- Authors: Kurbanov А.А.1, Kryukov S.R.1, Chernov Y.N.1, Chinenov D.V.1, Shpot E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health of FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
- Issue: No 5 (2023)
- Pages: 63-68
- Section: ONCOUROLOGY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1728-2985/article/view/275405
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2023.5.63-68
- ID: 275405
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
Introduction. Since the first report of laparoscopic nephrectomy by R.V. Clayman in 1991, laparoscopic techniques have become widespread in renal procedures. H.N. Winfield et al. performed the first transperitoneal partial nephrectomy in 1993, while I. Gill et al. described the first retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy one year later. All of the above techniques involved the use of four or more trocars. The fourth (additional) trocar is put for the assistant. There is an opinion that in most cases it is possible to perform partial nephrectomy without an assistant trocar, while maintaining the safety and efficiency of the procedure.
Aim. To compare the safety and efficiency of three-trocar and four-trocar partial nephrectomy.
Materials and methods. Between 2021 and 2023, a total of 200 patients were randomized to three- or four-trocar partial nephrectomy.
Results. There was no difference in the rate of achieving renal trifecta between the two groups. In the three-trocar group, 94 cases of renal trifecta were found, while in the four-trocar group, there were 95 patients with renal trifecta.
Conclusions. The three-trocar technique is not inferior in safety and efficiency to the standard four-trocar technique. The main advantages of the three-trocar technique are less pain, cost and post-operative scarring.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
А. А. Kurbanov
Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health of FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: asadulla10@mail.ru
Ph.D. student
Russian Federation, MoscowS. R. Kryukov
Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health of FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: s.krukov78@gmail.com
6-year student
Russian Federation, MoscowYa. N. Chernov
Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health of FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: chinenovdv@rambler.ru
Ph.D., urologist
Russian Federation, MoscowD. V. Chinenov
Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health of FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: chinenovdv@rambler.ru
Ph.D., associate professor
Russian Federation, MoscowE. V. Shpot
Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health of FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: shpot@inbox.ru
Ph.D., MD, professor
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492.
- Howlander N. et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2015.
- Vos T. et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
- Olweny E., Faiena I., Han C. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: state of the art review. Open Access Surgery. 2014;59. doi: 10.2147/OAS.S40275.
- Krishnakumar S., Tambe P. Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009;1(1):4. doi: 10.4103/0974-1216.51902.
- Asfour V., Smythe E., Attia R. Vascular injury at laparoscopy: a guide to management. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2018;38(5):598–606. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1410120.
- Krishnakumar S., Tambe P. Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009;1(1):4. doi: 10.4103/0974-1216.51902.
- Manno S., Dell’Atti L., Cicione A., Spasari A. Safety and efficacy of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Urologia Journal. 2021;88(1):14–20. doi: 10.1177/0391560320921728.
- Clayman R.V. et al. Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Initial Case Report. Journal of Urology. 1991;146(2 Part 1):278–282. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37770-4.
- Bianchi A., Cianflone F., Migliorini F., Cerruto M.A., Tafuri A., Antonelli A. Retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a step-by-step description of surgical technique. Mini-invasive Surgery. 2021. doi: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.64.
- Baio R. et al. Incidence rate and management of diaphragmatic injury during laparoscopic nephrectomies: single-center experience. J Surg Case Rep. 2022;6. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac127.
- Al-Azawi D., Houssein N., Rayis A.B., McMahon D., Hehir D.J. Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and chronic cholecystitis. BMC Surg. 2007;7(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-7-8.
- Schulze L., Dubeux V.T., Milfont J.C.A., Peçanha G., Ferrer P., Cavalcanti A.G. Analysis of surgical and histopathological results of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with use of three or four robotic arms: an early series results. International Braz J Urol. 2022;48(3):493–500. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0495.
- Mir M.C., Pavan N., Parekh D.J. Current Paradigm for Ischemia in Kidney Surgery. Journal of Urology. 2016;195(6):1655–1663. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.099.
- Crocerossa F. et al. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline at 1 Year After Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: A Multimodel Comparison of Predictors. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;38:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.005.
- Makevičius J., Čekauskas A., Želvys A., Ulys A., Jankevičius F., Miglinas M. Evaluation of Renal Function after Partial Nephrectomy and Detection of Clinically Significant Acute Kidney Injury. Medicina (B Aires). 2022;58(5):667. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050667.
- de Beaux A.C., East B. Thoughts on Trocar Site Hernia Prevention. A Narrative Review. Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery. 2022;1. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2022.11034.
- Nofal M.N., Yousef A.J., Hamdan F.F., Oudat A.H. Characteristics of Trocar Site Hernia after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2868. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59721-w.
- Ciscar A., Badia J.M., Novell F., Bolívar S., Mans E. Incidence and risk factors for trocar-site incisional hernia detected by clinical and ultrasound examination: a prospective observational study. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-01000-6.
- Raakow J., Klein D., Barutcu A.G., Biebl M., Pratschke J., Raakow R. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery comparing long-term patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(12):5533–5539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07351-3.
- Ozbasli E., Takmaz O., Albayrak N., Gungor M. Cosmetic Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared to Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Gynecologic Disease. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 2022;26(2):e2021.00081. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00081.
- Nip L., Tong K.-S., Borg C.M. Three-port versus four-port technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2022;6(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac013.
- Floyd T., Seok D., Jacobs M. Three-Port Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy with Splenic Vessel Preservation. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 2022;26(2):e2021.00087. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00087.
Supplementary files
