Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of the renal hilum tumor
- Authors: Sergeev V.P.1, Sergeeva A.A.1, Kochkin A.D.2, Martov A.G.1,3,4
-
Affiliations:
- A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia
- Faculty of Postgraduate Education “Privolzhskiy Research Medical University”
- Medical Scientific and Educational Center of Lomonosov Moscow State University
- FBU "Central Clinical Hospital of Civil Aviation"
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 17-21
- Section: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1728-2985/article/view/314209
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2025.1.17-21
- ID: 314209
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
Aim. To discuss the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for patients with renal hilar tumors.
Material and methods. A single-center retrospective comparative study of perioperative results included 166 patients who have undergone LPN. Patients were divided into two groups. In the group 1, there were 44 patients with hilar tumor of any R.E.N.A.L. index, while the control group consisted of 122 patients with cortical tumors of R.E.N.A.L. >7. Perioperative factors and results were studied and compared. The rate and structure of intra- and postoperative complications, reasons for conversion, volume of blood loss and ischemia time, duration of the procedure and length of stay, as well as changes of glomerular filtration rate and creatinine were assessed.
Results. There were no conversions to open approach or nephrectomy, as well as positive surgical margins. The RENAL score was higher for hilar tumor group (9 vs 8; p<0.001). No significant difference was obtained according to the frequency of complications, blood loss volume, warm ischemia time and length of stay (p>0.05 for all values). The average drop of hemoglobin level and glomerular filtration rate were also similar (p>0.05 for all values). Therefore, there were no any significant differences between groups except for three parameters. Among all patients with left-sided hilar tumors transmesocolic approach was used more often (31.6% vs 6.8%; p=0.025). Unlike standard procedures, about a third of hilar interventions were completed without renorrhaphy (8.2% vs 27.3% for the control and main groups, respectively; p=0.001). In the group 1, benign lesions were identified in 20.5%, while in the control group in 4.9% cases (p=0.002).
Conclusion. Our study showed that conventional LPN is safe and efficient procedure even in cases of “complex” renal hilar tumors.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Vladimir P. Sergeev
A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: garivas@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6063-6700
assistant at the Department of Urology and Andrology, Head of the Department of Oncourology
Russian Federation, MoscowAnastasia A. Sergeeva
A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia
Email: Kazhera@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4108-4066
urologist of the center of urology and andrology
Russian Federation, MoscowAlexey D. Kochkin
Faculty of Postgraduate Education “Privolzhskiy Research Medical University”
Email: kochman@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7242-377X
Ph.D., MD, Head of the Department of Urology
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodAlexey G. Martov
A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia; Medical Scientific and Educational Center of Lomonosov Moscow State University; FBU "Central Clinical Hospital of Civil Aviation"
Email: martovalex@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6324-6110
Ph.D., MD, professor, corresponding member of RAS, Head of the Department of Urology and Andrology, leading researcher at the Department of Urology and Andrology, Chief of Urologic Center
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; MoscowReferences
- Russian clinical recommendations. Kidney cancer. 2023; 34-36. Russian (Российские клинические рекомендации. Рак паренхимы почки. 2023; 34-36.)
- Van Poppel H., Da Pozzo L., Albrecht W., Matveev V., Bono A., Borkowski A., Colombel M., Klotz L., Skinner E., Keane T., Marreaud S., Collette S., Sylvester R.: A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;59:543–552. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013
- Kim S.P., Thompson R.H., Boorjian S.A., Weight C.J., Han L.C., Murad M.H., Shippee N.D., Erwin P.J., Costello B.A., Chow G.K., Leibovich B.C.: Comparative effectiveness for survival and renal function of partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012;188:51–57, doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.006
- Gritskevitch A., Il’in S., Timina I., Zotikov A., Karmazanovskiy G., Teplov A., Pokrovskiy A., Kubyshkin V. Technique of extracorporeal partial nephrectomy in terms of pharmaco-cold ischemia without crossing the ureter with renal vessels orthotopic replantation in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urology Herald. 2015;(3):3–33. Russian (Грицкевич А.А., Ильин С.А., Тимина И.Е., Зотиков А.Е., Кармазановский Г.Г., Теплов А.А., Покровский А.В., Кубышкин В.А. Резекция почки ex vivo в условиях фармако-холодовой ишемии без пересечения мочеточника с ортотопической реплантацией сосудов при почечно-клеточном раке. Вестник урологии. 2015;(3):3-33). doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2015-0-3-3-33.
- Matveev V.B., Volkova M.I., Sinitsyna O.R., Kuznetsov K.P., Perlin D.V. Outcomes of extracorporeal partial nephrectomy in patients with malignant tumors: a retrospective and prospective study. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2024;26(1):98–104. (Матвеев В.Б., Волкова М.И., Синицына О.Р., Кузнецов К.П., Перлин Д.В. Результаты экстракорпоральной резекции почки у больных со злокачественными опухолями. Современная онкология. 2024;26(1):98–104) doi: 10.26442/18151434.2024.1.202566
- Kutikov A., Fossett L.K., Ramchandani P., Tomaszewski J.E., Siegelman E.S., Banner M.P., Van Arsdalen K.N., Wein A.J., Malkowicz S.B. Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology. 2006;68:737–740. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.011
- Kieran K., Montgomery J.S., Daignault S. et al. Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients. J Endourol. 2007;21(7):754–759. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0337
- Kochkin A.D., Martov A.G., Sevryukov F.A., Gallyamov E.A., Sergeev V.P., Novikov A.B., Presnov K.S., Semenychev D.V., Knutov A.V., Sanzharov A.E., Orlov I.N., Meschankin I.V. Laparoscopic transmesenteric partial nephrectomy – first results. Pacific Medical Journal. 2016;(1):76–78. Russian (Кочкин А.Д., Мартов А.Г., Севрюков Ф.А., Галлямов Э.А., Сергеев В.П., Новиков А.Б., Преснов К.С., Семёнычев Д.В., Кнутов А.В., Санжаров А.Е., Орлов И.Н., Мещанкин И.В. Лапароскопическая трансмезентериальная резекция почки – первые результаты. Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. 2016;(1):76–78).
- Parekh D.J., Weinberg J.M., Ercole B. et al. Tolerance of the human kidney to isolated controlled ischemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(3):506–517. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012080786
- Bollens R., Rosenblatt A., Espinoza BP. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with “on-demand” clamping reduces warm ischemia time. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):804-809. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.011
Supplementary files
