Email this article Intercultural communication competence development through student mobility programmes and through internationalisation at home
- Authors: Makeeva E.Y.1, Gousseva N.2
-
Affiliations:
- Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
- Faculty of International Business and Communication, Maastricht University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 4 (2018)
- Pages: 130-141
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1991-8569/article/view/52402
- ID: 52402
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This paper assumes that internationalisation of higher education demands a variety of pedagogical approaches to facilitate every student’s acquisition of intercultural competencies. Drawing from two existing internationalisation approaches, it is argued that intercultural communication - both as a field of study and a discipline - can also play a key role in this process. Only graduates who possess intercultural communication competence as well asknowledge and such skills as cultural awareness, second language acquisition, and interaction across cultures will be able to live and work more effectively in a diverse and global environment.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Elena Yu. Makeeva
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Email: helenmckey2205@gmail.com
Cand. Phil. Sci., Associate Professor, Head of English Philology and Intercultural Communication Department. 65/67, M. Gorkiy str., Samara, Russian Federation, 443099
Natasha Gousseva
Faculty of International Business and Communication, Maastricht University
Email: natasha.gousseva@zuyd.nl
Associate Professor of European Studies Department. Brusselsweg 150, 6217 HB Maastricht, Postbus 634, 6200 AP Maastricht
References
- Arum S. & van de Water J. (1992). The need for a definition of international education in U.S. universities // In C. Klasek (Ed.), Bridges to the futures: Strategies for internationalizing higher education. pp. 191-203.
- Knight J. (2003). Internationalisation of higher education: Practices and Priorities. IAU: Survey Report.
- Knight J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 8, pp. 5-31.
- Deardorff D.K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of studies in international education, vol. 10, pp. 241-266.
- Knight J. (2003). Updated definition of internationalisation. International Higher Education.The Boston College Center for International High Education. № 33.
- Nilsson B. (1999). Internationalisation at home: Theory and practice. EAIE Forum, 12.
- McGrath D. (2016). Internationalization at Home: Intercultural competency assessment at a regional university campus in British Columbia. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Accessed: 10/01/2018. URL: https://www.sfu.ca/content/sfu/crie/conference---internationalizing- higher-education/presentations.pdf
- Красильникова Н.В. Управление интернационализацией высшего образования: стратегическое планирование и оценка // Журнал Сибирского федерального университета. Сер. Гуманитарные науки. - 2015. - Т. 8. - № 8. - С. 1635-1641.
- Стенина Т.Л., Чамчиян А.О. Анализ содержания понятия «интернационализация высшего образования» в контексте педагогики // Наука и школа. - 2016. - № 2. - С. 69-75.
- Aulakh G., Brady P., Dunwoodie K., Perry J., Roff G. & Stewart M. (1997). Internationalising the Curriculum across RMIT University. Melbourne: RMIT.
- Crichton J., Paige M., Papademetre L. & Scarino A. (2004). Integrated resources for intercultural teaching and learning in the context of internationalisation in higher education // Research Centre for Languages and Cultures Education, University of South Australia. 216 p.
- Stier J. (2006). Intercultural communication and intercultural competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication, Issue 11.
- Gudykunst W. & Kim Y. (2003). Communicating with Strangers. An approach to intercultural communication (4th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Kiss G. (2008). A theoretical approach to intercultural communication, AARMS, Volume 7, Number 3, p. 435-443.
- Deardorff D.K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New directions for institutional research, vol. 2011, pp. 65-79.
- Makeeva E., Lopukhova Y. (2018). Cross-cultural communication course as a form of internationalisation at home within Russian higher education institutions // Society, Integration, Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume I, Higher Education. Rezekne, Rezekne Academy of Technologies, pp. 361-372.
- Altbach P.G. & Teichler U. (2001). Internationalization and Exchanges in a globalized university, Journal of Studies in International Education 5(1), pp. 5-25.
- Kwiek M. (2000). The nation-state, globalization and the modern institution of the university. Theoria 96 (December), pp. 72-98.
- Enders J. & Fulton O. (eds.) (2002): Higher Education in a Globalising World. International Trends and Mutual Observations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Teichler U. (ed.). (2002). ERASMUS in the SOCRATES programme: Findings of an evaluation study. Bonn: Lemmens.
- Maiworm F., Sosa W. & Teichler U. (1996). The context of ERASMUS. A survey of institutional management and infrastructure in support of mobility and co-operation. Werkstattberichte, 49; ERASMUS Monographs, 22.
- Teichler U. & Maiworm F. (1997). The ERASMUS experience: Major findings of the ERASMUS evaluation research project. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- Nuffic (2017). Incoming student mobility in Dutch higher education.
- VSNU (2017-2018). Factsheet on language policies at research universities in the Netherlands.
- Study at Zuyd: Why the Netherlands. Accessed: 19/11/2018. URL: https://www.zuyd.nl/en/ study-at-zuyd/why-the-netherlands
- The Dutch way of teaching. Accessed: 19/11/2018. URL: https://www.studyinholland.nl/why- holland/the-dutch-way-of-teaching
Supplementary files
