Email this article Approaches to the formation of the communicative personality of the future teacher in the classroom of the course «Academic eloquence»
- Authors: Filippova O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogarev
- Issue: Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 49-64
- Section: Higher school education
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1991-8569/article/view/71257
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2022.1.4
- ID: 71257
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper attempts to develop a set of approaches to the formation of the communicative personality of the future teacher in the classroom of the course «Academic eloquence» in the magistracy, to systematize and summarize the experience of using rhetorization technology in order to teach strategies and tactics of professional speech in the academic field. To teach undergraduate students academic eloquence, it is necessary to take into account the structure and characteristics of the teacher’s communicative personality, the leading strategies and tactics of academic discourse, genre features of academic speech and productive technologies used in the field of professional education of future teachers. In this regard, the author tried to formulate approaches to the formation of the communicative personality of the future teacher, reflecting the traditions of academic eloquence and modern trends in the field of professional rhetorical education, to identify and substantiate the didactic potential of the textbook of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences T.A. Ladyzhenskaya. The author reveals the concept of «the communicative personality of a teacher» and describes a set of basic pedagogical approaches to organizing the effective work of students in the classroom of the course «Academic eloquence». The conditions are discussed that determine the effectiveness of organizing classes, enriching students with communicative experience in the field of professional communication and rhetorical practice, forming value attitudes and the ability to select the optimal language means when creating academic speech as a means of solving professional problems. Within the framework of considering the value-axiological, genre-oriented, personal-professional and problem-praxeological approaches to the formation of the communicative personality of the future teacher, the methods of rhetorization technology at the level of teaching the subject are described: rhetorical analysis, rhetorical task and rhetorical game. The introduction of the considered approaches and techniques into the educational process made it possible to bring training closer to the needs of modern academic practice and showed its effectiveness in the formation of general cultural and general professional competencies necessary for a future teacher.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Olga V. Filippova
National Research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogarev
Author for correspondence.
Email: filippovaov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9829-4451
SPIN-code: 4694-3952
Doc. of Ped. Sci., Head of Russian as a Foreign Language Department
Russian Federation, Saransk, the Republic of MordoviaReferences
- Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya po napravleniyu podgotovki 45.04.01 Filologiya (uroven’ magistratury) / Prikaz Minobrnauki RF ot 12.08.2020 № 980 // Sayt: Portal Federal’nykh gosudarstvennykh standartov vysshego obrazovaniya [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education in the field of training 45.04.01 Philology (Master’s level)]. http://fgosvo.ru (accessed November 23, 2020).
- Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya po napravleniyu podgotovki 37.04.01 Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye (uroven’ magistratury) / Prikaz Minobrnauki RF ot 22.02.2018 № 126 // Sayt: Portal Federal’nykh gosudarstvennykh standartov vysshego obrazovaniya [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education in the field of training 37.04.01 Pedagogical education (master’s level)]. http://fgosvo.ru (accessed November 23, 2020).
- Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya po napravleniyu podgotovki 45.04.02 Lingvistika (uroven’ magistratury) / Prikaz Minobrnauki RF ot 12.08.2020 № 992 // Sayt: Portal Federal’nykh gosudarstvennykh standartov vysshego obrazovaniya [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education in the field of training 45.04.02 Linguistics (master’s level)]. http://fgosvo.ru (accessed November 23, 2020).
- Sukhomlinova M.A. Akademicheskiy diskurs kak odin iz vidov institutsional’nogo obshcheniya: priznaki i kriterii vydeleniya [Academic discourse as one of the types of institutional communication: signs and criteria for allocation]. Sovremennyye paradigmy lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy: metody i podkhody. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 23–24 noyabrya 2017 g. Sterlitamak: Sterlitamakskiy filial FGBOU VO «Bashkirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet», 2017. Рр. 164–171.
- Bennet K. English academic discourse: its hegemonic status and implications for translation: doutoramento em Estudos de Cultura. Especialidade: Estudos de Tradução. Lisboa, 2008. 325 p.
- Afanas’yeva Yu.A., Fedotova M.G. Ponyatiye kommunikativnoy lichnosti i eye sushchnost’ v kontekste kommunikativnogo obrazovaniya [The concept of a communicative personality and its essence in the context of communicative education]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2016. No. 5. Рр. 14–19.
- Ariskina O.L., Dryangina E.A. Expressiveness in the structure of the teacher’s linguistic personality (a case study of K.D. Ushinsky). Vol. 7. Número Especial / Julio – Septiembre 2020. Pp. 153–165.
- Sivtsova N.V., Ariskina O.L. Yazykovyye sredstva vyrazheniya znaniya v lektsionnoy rechi M.M. Bakhtina [Language means of expressing knowledge in M.M. Bakhtin’s lecture speech]. Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2013. No. 91 (07). Рр. 1759–1769. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20678997 (accessed Marсh 20, 2020).
- Voronova N.G. Tip yazykovoy sposobnosti A.S. Makarenko [Type of language ability A.S. Makarenko]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya. 2014. No. 4 (47). Рр. 247–249.
- Kopnina G.A., Lukashevich E.V. Ritorika akademicheskoy sfery: o soderzhanii razdela uchebnoy knigi «Ritorika» (dlya magistratury po napravleniyu «Filologiya» v vuzakh Rossii i Kazakhstana) [Rhetoric of the academic sphere: on the content of the section of the educational book «Rhetoric» (for the master’s degree in the direction of «Philology» in the universities of Russia and Kazakhstan)]. Filologo-kommunikativnyye issledovaniya. 2016. No. 3. Рр. 57–73.
- Dzyubko G.Yu. Mekhanizmy realizatsii tekhnologii vitagennogo obucheniya v vuze (na primere distsipliny «Akademicheskaya ritorika» [Mechanisms for the implementation of vitagenic learning technology at a university (on the example of the discipline «Academic rhetoric»]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii. 2018. No. 6. Рр. 81–86.
- Vershinina N.V. Ritoricheskiye umeniya kak osnova formirovaniya kommunikativno-rechevoy kul’tury budushchikh pedagogov [Rhetorical skills as the basis for the formation of the communicative-speech culture of future teachers]. Kontsept. 2015. No. 04 (April). Рр. 41–45. http://e-koncept.ru/2015/15097.htm (accessed December 15, 2020).
- Zvorygina O.I. Ritorizatsiya uchebnogo protsessa v pedagogicheskom vuze v usloviyakh novykh obrazovatel’nykh standartov [Rhetorization of the educational process in a pedagogical university in the context of new educational standards]. Lingvoritoricheskaya paradigma: teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye aspekty. 2016. No. 21. Рр. 111–115.
- Ladyzhenskaya T.A. Zhivoye slovo. Ustnaya rech’ kak sredstvo i predmet obucheniya: Ucheb. posobiye [Living word. Oral speech as a means and subject of learning]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 1986. 127 p.
- Gogol’ N.V. O prepodavanii vseobshchey istorii (1833 g.) [Ob akademicheskom krasnorechii] [About teaching general history]. Russkaya ritorika: Khrestomatiya. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 1996. Рр. 307–308.
- Bakhtin M.M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov [The problem of speech genres]. Literaturno-kriticheskiye stat’i / Sost. S. Bocharov, V. Kozhinov. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1986. Рр. 428–472.
- Zubkova Ya.V. Konstitutivnyye priznaki akademicheskogo diskursa [Constitutive features of academic discourse]. Izvestiya VGPU. Ser. Filologicheskiye nauki. Sovremennyye teorii yazyka. 2009. No. 5. Рр. 28–32.
- Karasik V.I. Kommunikativnyy podkhod k izucheniyu pedagogicheskogo diskursa [A communicative approach to the study of pedagogical discourse]. Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom. 2017. No. 5 (264). Рр. 4–8.
- Kravchenko A.V. Kommunikatsiya i yazyk: nekotoryye soobrazheniya o predmetnoy oblasti kommunikativistiki [Communication and language: some thoughts on the subject area of communication science]. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika. 2013. No. 2. Рр. 4–9.
- Hyland K. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London and New York: Continuum, 2009. 215 p.
- Lobacheva N.A. Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki akademicheskogo diskursa: prepodavatel’ – student [Communication strategies and tactics of academic discourse: teacher – student]. Sovremennyye problemy sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh nauk: Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy zaochnoy konferentsii 29 aprelya 2016 g. Nauchno-obrazovatel’nyy tsentr «Znaniye». Kazan: Roketa Soyuz Publ., 2016. Рр. 137–143.
- Maron A.E., Monakhova L.Yu., Fedotova V.S. Pedagogicheskaya prakseologiya: struktura znaniya i modeli realizatsii v professional’nom obuchenii [Pedagogical praxeology: the structure of knowledge and models of implementation in vocational training]. Chelovek i obrazovaniye. 2012. No. 2 (31). Рр. 27–31.
Supplementary files
