Email this article Influence of the method of postoperative analgesia on the dynamics of intra-abdominal pressure in postpartum women with obesity
- Authors: Marshalov D.V.1, Shifman E.M2, Salov I.A1, Petrenko A.P1, Krutova A.A1
-
Affiliations:
- The V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
- The M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow regional Research Clinical Institute
- Issue: Vol 10, No 3 (2016)
- Pages: 173-178
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1993-6508/article/view/42821
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18821/19936508-2016-10-3-173-178
- ID: 42821
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction: It is assumed that one of the factors of high incidence of postoperative complications in postpartum women with obesity is intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). The aim of the work was to evaluate the dynamics of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in postpartum women with obesity, depending on the method of postoperative analgesia. The study involved 136 patients divided into 4 groups: control group - initial BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg / m2, II of group - patients with obesity I degree (n = 40); Group III - obesity II degree (n = 35); Group IV - III degree obesity (n = 21). All patients were divided into two subgroups - postoperative analgesia with opioids and epidural analgesia (EA). We investigated the timing of reversal of intestinal motility, passage of gas, nausea severity, dynamics IAP and compliance of the anterior abdominal wall. Postoperative dynamics IAP is associated with motor function of the intestine, which is dependent on the initial level of IAP. Paresis intestine often diagnosed at a rate of more than 95% of IAP percentile - for the control group of patients more than 20 mm Hg for patients with obesity more than 23 mm Hg., recorded before the operation. With the development of paresis bowel IAP dynamics within three postoperative days it was practically absent (Δ IAP = 2,55 ± 1,28 mm Hg). Postoperative EA, compared with the use of narcotic analgesics, significantly reduces IAP during the first postoperative day, which prevented the development of their intestinal paresis (RR 0.47; 95% CI: 0,24-0,83), reduced incidence of postoperative nausea (RR 0.47; 95% CI: 0,18-1,21), allows you to quickly reduce the level of IAP in the subsequent days of the postoperative period (59.7%, compared with the effect of opioids). The method of postoperative analgesia affects the dynamics of IAP. EA is the method of choice for postoperative analgesia in postpartum women with obesity and the initially high level of IAP.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Dmitriy V. Marshalov
The V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Email: marshald@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University 410017, Saratov, Russian Federation
E. M Shifman
The M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow regional Research Clinical Institute410017, Saratov, Russian Federation
I. A Salov
The V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University129110, Moscow, Russian Federation
A. P Petrenko
The V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University410017, Saratov, Russian Federation
A. A Krutova
The V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University410017, Saratov, Russian Federation
References
- Lutsiv O., Mah J., Beyene J., McDonald S.D. The effects of morbid obesity on maternal and neonatal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Obes Rev. 2015; 16(7): 531-46.
- Fennimore R., Fabbri S., Miranda-Seijo P. Panniculectomy at the Time of Cesarean Section and Postoperative Wound Complications in Morbidly Obese Women. J Reprod Med. 2015; 60(11-12): 535-9.
- Van Der Linden E.L., Browne J.L., Vissers K.M., Antwi E., Agyepong I.A., Grobbee D.E., Klipstein-Grobusch K. Maternal body mass index and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A ghanaian cohort study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016; 24(1): 215-22.
- Салов И.А., Шифман Е.М., Маршалов Д.В., Петренко А.П. Значение внутрибрюшной гипертензии в реализации акушерской и перинатальной патологии у беременных с ожирением. Акушерство и гинекология. 2012; 4(1): 99-102.
- Varela J., Hinojosa M., Nguyen N. Correlations between intra-abdominal pressure and obesity-related co-morbidities. Surg. for Obes. and Related Dis. 2009; 5: 524-8.
- Wilson A., Longhi J., Goldman C., McNatt S. Intra-abdominal pressure and the morbidly obese patients: the effect of body mass index. J. Trauma. 2010; 69 (1): 78-83.
- Malbrain M., De Waele J. Intra-abdominal hypertension (Core critical care). Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 2013.
- Balogh Z.J., Lumsdaine W., Moore E.E., Moore F.A. Postinjury abdominal compartment syndrome: from recognition to prevention. Lancet. 2014; 384(9952): 1466-75.
- Strang S.G., Van Imhoff D.L., Van Lieshout E.M., D’Amours S.K., Van Waes O.J. Identifying patients at risk for high-grade intra-abdominal hypertension following trauma laparotomy. Injury. 2015; 46(5): 843-8.
- Abdel-Razeq S.S., Campbell K., Funai E.F., Kaplan L.J., Ozan Bahtiyar M. Normative postpartum intra-abdominal pressure: potential implications in the diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 149e1-4.
- Cheatham M.L. Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. New Horiz. 1999; 7: 96-115.
- Theodossic S.P., Nick A.M., George M., Ioannis G.P., Isaak I.K., Spiros T.P. Abdominal compliance, linearity between abdominal pressure and ascitic fluid volume. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock. 2011; 4(2): 194-7.
- Kirkpatrick A.W., Roberts D.J., De Waele J., Jaeschke R., Malbrain M. L.N.G., De Keulenaer B. et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39: 1190-206.
Supplementary files
