Repositioning People in Creative Futures: A Method to Create Sound Advice with Exploratory Scenarios

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Foresight scenarios are not only useful presentational devices to show that many aspects of the future are open. Scenarios are means for generating advice that helps policymakers initiate actions in the present or near future that will be of long-term significance. Despite the influence that such advice may have on policy decisions, the Foresight literature has paid very little attention to the creation of policy recommendations. Though reports of scenario exercises frequently conclude with lists of recommendations that follow from the study, there is very little explication of the process whereby advice is elicited from the examination of these future scenarios. This paper addresses this gap, examining how the generation of recommendations is related to the development of scenarios within multiple future repositioning workshop settings. It focuses on the fluency and originality of these recommendations, and how this is influenced by repositioning participants in highly transformational scenarios. Repositioning is the process whereby participants are invited to imagine themselves playing roles in hypothetical future contexts, and on that basis to make decisions or devise strategies as if they actually were immersed in these circumstances. The method proposed and the findings of the case study have implications for why and how this future repositioning approach can be incorporated as a ‘key feature’ in the design of Foresight activities. The aim is also to raise awareness of the need for more exploration of Foresight recommendation methodology.

About the authors

Guillermo Velasco

Polytechnic University of Madrid; University of Manchester

Email: guillermo.velasco@upm.es
28040 Madrid, Spain; Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Rafael Popper

Futures Diamond Ltd.; Raise Chartered Accountants; University of Manchester; VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

Email: rafael.popper@vtt.fi
Trimble House, 9 Bold Street, Warrington, WA1 1DN, Manchester, United Kingdom; Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK; P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland

Ian Miles

HSE University; University of Manchester

Author for correspondence.
Email: i.d.miles@manchester.ac.uk

References

  1. Alvarez A. Ritchey T. (2015) Applications of General Morphological Analysis: From Engineering Design to Policy Analysis. Acta Morphologica Generalis, 4(1), 1-40. http://www.amg.swemorph.com/pdf/amg-4-1-2015.pdf, accessed 19.08.2020.
  2. Amabile T.M. (1983) The social psychology of creativity, New York: Springer.
  3. Budescu D.V., Rantilla A.K., Yu H., Karelitz T.K. (2003) The effects of asymmetry among advisors on the aggregation of their opinions. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 178-194.
  4. Bussey M. (2014) Concepts and effects: Ordering and practice in foresight. Foresight, 16(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-04-2013-0017
  5. Caplan S.E., Samter W. (1999) The role of facework in younger and older adults' evaluations of social support messages. Communication Quarterly, 47, 245-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909385558
  6. Carleton T., Cockayne W., Tahvanainan A.-J. (2015) Playbook for Strategic Foresight and Innovation, Stanford, CA: DesignX Lab - Foresight, Center for Design Research, University of Stanford.
  7. Cross R., Borgatti S.P., Parker A. (2001) Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks, 23(3), 215-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00041-7
  8. Da Costa O., Warnke P., Scapolo F., Cagnin C. (2008) The impact of foresight on policy making: Insights from the FOR- LEARN mutual learning process. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(3), 369-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802000146
  9. Daimer S., Gheorghiu R., Ordonez-Matamoros H.G., Laredo P., Giesecke S., Popper R. Loikkanen T., Molas-Gallart J., Haegeman K., Degelsegger A. (2015) VERA Final Report. Report of the Forward Visions on the European Research Area (VERA) project, funded by the European Union's FP7 programme for research, technological development and demonstration, Brussels: European Commission. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/5135969/VERA_Final_Report_2015-06-30_public.pdf, accessed 28.08.2020.
  10. Dalal R.S., Bonaccio S. (2010) What types of advice do decision-makers prefer? Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 112, 11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.007
  11. Dator J. (2009) Alternative Futures at the Manoa School. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 1-18.
  12. Dator J., Rodgers S. (1991) Alternative futures for the state courts of 2020, Chicago, IL: American Judicature Society.
  13. De Jouvenel B. (1967) The Art of Conjecture, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  14. De Smedt P. (2013) Interactions between foresight and decision making. In: Participation and Interaction in Foresight: Dialogue, Dissemination and Visions (eds. K. Borch, S. Dingli, M.S. Jorgensen), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 17-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781956137.00008
  15. Dorfler V., Stierand M. (2020) (eds.) Handbook of Research Methods on Creativity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  16. Dufva M., Ahlqvist T. (2015) Knowledge creation dynamics in foresight: A knowledge typology and exploratory method to analyse foresight workshops. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 94, 251-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.007
  17. Eriksson A., Weber M. (2008) Adaptive foresight: navigating the complex landscape of policy strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(4), 462-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.02.006
  18. European Commission (2002) Thinking, debating and shaping the future: Foresight for Europe. Final report from a High Level Expert Group for the European Commission. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Research Unit RTD-K.2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262013061_Thinking_debating_and_shaping_the_future_Foresight_for_Europe, accessed 28.08.2020.
  19. Fergnani A. (2019) The future persona: A futures method to let your scenarios come to life. Foresight, 21(4), 445-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2018-0086
  20. Fisher J.D., Nadler A., Whitcher-Alagna S. (1982) Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91 (1), 27-54. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.27
  21. Flanagan K., Uyarra E., Laranja M. (2011) Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix' for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
  22. Gabina J. (1995) El futuro revisitado: La reflexion prospectiva como arma de estrategia y decision, Barcelona, Marcombo - Boixareu Editores.
  23. Georghiou L., Cassingena Harper J., Keenan M., Miles I., Popper R. (eds.) (2008) The Handbook of Technology Foresight. Concepts and Practice (PRIME Series on Research and Innovation Policy), Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited.
  24. Gibbons A.M. (2003) Alternative forms of advice in natural decision settings. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  25. Glover J.A., Ronning R.R., Reynolds C.R. (1989) (ed.) Handbook of Creativity. Boston, MA: Springer.
  26. Godet M. (1992) De l'Anticipation a' l'Action: Manuel de Prospective et de Strategie, Paris: Dunod.
  27. Goldsmith D.J. (1994) The role of facework in supportive communication. In: Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (eds. B.R. Burleson, T.L. Albrecht, I.G. Sarason), pp. 29-49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  28. Guilford J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
  29. Guilford J.P. (1967) The nature of human intelligence, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  30. Haegeman K., Perez S., Marinelli E., Warnke P., Teufel B., Degelsegger A., Weiss G. (2012) Communication Strategy, JRC/IPTS-Fraunhofer ISI-ZSI Report of the Forward Visions on the European Research Area (VERA) project. Brussels: European Commission.
  31. Harper J., Pace G. (2007) Creative processes in policy making: A case for context in foresight. In: Creative Thinking: Designing Future Possibilities (ed. M.S. Dingli.), pp. 1-11, Valetta: Malta University Press. http://www.cs.um.edu.mt/gordon.pace/Teaching/Foresight/Papers/context.pdf, accessed 19.04.2021.
  32. Havas A. (2005) Terminology and Methodology for Benchmarking Foresight Programmes (ForSociety Project, Tasks 1.4 and 3.1), Brussels: European Commission. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77791/, accessed 28.08.2020.
  33. Heath C., Gonzalez R. (1995) Interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: Evidence against information collection views of interactive decision-making. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 305-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1024
  34. Huang W.-C., Lee Y.-Y. (2016) Strategic Planning for Land Use under Extreme Climate Changes: A Case Study in Taiwan. Sustainability, 8(1), 53. , accessed 19.08.2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010053
  35. Inayatullah S. (2004) The causal layered analysis (CLA) reader: Theory and case studies of an integrative and transformative methodology. Taipei, Taiwan: Tamkang University Press.
  36. Johnson T.R., Budescu D.V., Wallsten T.S. (2001) Averaging probability judgments: Monte Carlo analyses of diagnostic value. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 123-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.369
  37. Kahane A. (2012) Transformative Scenario Planning: Working Together to Change the Future, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  38. Keenan M., Popper R. (2008) Comparing foresight ‘style' in six world regions. Foresight, 10(6), 16-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810918568
  39. Kincaid M., Duffus L. (2004) Learning, Thinking and Creativity, New York: IDES.
  40. Kuwahara T. (1996) Technology foresight in Japan: A new approach in methodology and analysis. STI Review, 11, 51-70.
  41. Ladkin D. (2004) Action research. In: Qualitative Research Practice (2004) (eds. C. Seale, G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium, D. Silverman.), London: Sage Publications, pp. 478-490.
  42. Malaska P. (2001) A Futures Research Outline of a Post-Modern Idea of Progress. Futures, 33, 225-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00069-0
  43. Mardani A., Jusoh A., Zavadskas E.K., Cavallaro F., Khalifah Z. (2015) Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An Overview of the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques and Approaches. Sustainability, 7(10), 13947-13984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013947
  44. Martin L., Wilson N. (2018) (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  45. Masini E. (1982) Reconceptualizing the Future: A Need and a Hope. World Futures Society Bulletin, 16(6), 1-8. http://master-foresight-innovation.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/EMasiniReconceptualizingFutures.pdf, accessed 19.04.2021.
  46. McKernan J. (1996) Curriculum Action Research: A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner (2nd ed.), London: Kogan Page.
  47. Medina J. (1999) The research on future images and visions: Need for a strategic alliance between the futures studies and social sciences. International Review of Sociology, 9(3), 333-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.1999.9971321
  48. Miles I. (2008) From Futures to Foresight. In: The Handbook of Technology Foresight. Concepts and Practice (PRIME Series on Research and Innovation Policy) (eds. L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, R. Popper), Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited, pp. 24-40.
  49. Miles I., Cassingena Harper J., Georghiou L., Keenan M., Popper R. (2008b) New Frontiers: Emerging Foresight. In: The Handbook of Technology Foresight. Concepts and Practice (PRIME Series on Research and Innovation Policy) (eds. L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, R. Popper), Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited, pp. 400-417.
  50. Miles I., Saritas O., Sokolov A. (eds.) (2016) Foresight for Science, Technology and Innovation, Berlin: Springer.
  51. Miles, I. Cassingena Harper, J., Georghiou, L., Keenan, M., and Popper, R. (2008a) The Many Faces of Foresight, In: The Handbook of Technology Foresight. Concepts and Practice (PRIME Series on Research and Innovation Policy) (eds. L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, R. Popper), Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited, pp. 3-23.
  52. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  53. Paulus P.B. (2000) Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(29), 237-262. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013
  54. Paulus P.B., Nijstad B.A. (2019) (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  55. Popper R. (2008a) How are foresight methods selected? Foresight, 10(6), 62-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810918586
  56. Popper R. (2008b) Foresight Methodology. In: The Handbook of Technology Foresight. Concepts and Practice (PRIME Series on Research and Innovation Policy) (eds. L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, R. Popper), Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited, pp. 44-90.
  57. Popper R. (2009) Mapping Foresight: Revealing how Europe and other world regions navigate into the future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission.
  58. Popper R., Edler J., Velasco G., Amanatidou E., Miles I. (2015b) ERA Strategy Map (Report for the EC funded project VERA on Visions for the European Research Area, funded by the European Union's FP7 programme for research, technological development and demonstration), Manchester: The University of Manchester. http://eravisions.archiv.zsi.at/page/22/attach/VERA_WP5_D5_2_ERA_Strategy_Map_26_6_2015.pdf, accessed 28.08.2020.
  59. Popper R., Keenan M., Miles I., Butter M., Saintz G. (2007) Global foresight outlook. Mapping foresight in Europe and the rest of the world, Brussels: European Commission.
  60. Popper R., Popper M., Velasco G. (2020) Sustainable Innovation Assessment and Management Framework: Principles, Methodology and Practice. In: Governance and Management of Sustainable Innovation: Learning from Experience to Shape the Future (eds. M. Martini, R. Holsgens, R. Popper), Cham: Springer, pp. 3-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46750-0_1
  61. Popper R., Velasco G., Edler J., Amanatidou E., Miles I. (2015a) ERA Open Advice: Forward Visions on the European Research Area (VERA project report, funded by the European Union's FP7 programme for research, technological development and demonstration), Manchester: The University of Manchester. http://eravisions.archiv.zsi.at/page/22/attach/ERA_Open_Advice.pdf, accessed 28.08.2020.
  62. Ramos J. (2017) Linking Foresight and Action: Toward a Futures Action Research. In: The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research (eds. L.L. Rowell, C.D. Bruce, J.M. Shosh, M.M. Riel), London: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 823-842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_48
  63. Rietzschel E., Nijstad B., Stroebe W. (2010) The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 47-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X414204
  64. Ringland G. (2006) Scenario Planning. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
  65. Salo A., Cuhls K. (2003) Technology Foresight - Past and Future. Journal of Forecasting, 22(2-3), 79-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.846
  66. Scapolo F., Miles I. (2006) Eliciting Experts' Knowledge: A Comparison of Two Methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(6), 679-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.001
  67. Schrah G.E., Dalal R.S., Sniezek J.A. (2006) No decision-maker is an island: Integrating expert advice with information search. Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making, 19, 43-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.514
  68. Slaughter R. (1995) The foresight principle, Westport, CT: Adamantine Press.
  69. Soll J. B. (1999) Intuitive theories of information: Beliefs about the value of redundancy. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 317-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0699
  70. Staton M. (2008) Monstrous foresight. In: (Eds. C. Cagnin, M. Keenan, R. Johnston, F. Scapolo, R. Barre), Future-oriented Technology Analysis. Strategic Intelligence for an Innovative Economy, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 53-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68811-2_5
  71. Sternberg R. (1998) (ed.) Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Sternberg R.J. (1985) Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Intelligence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  73. Teufel B., Erdmann L., Schirrmeister E., Daimer S., Laredo P., Schoen A., Robinson D.K.R., Loikkanen T. (2013) ERA Scenario Report (Report of the Forward Visions on the European Research Area (VERA) project). Brussels: European Commission. http://eravisions.archiv.zsi.at/page/22/attach/WP3_ERA_Scenario_report_final_28052015.pdf, accessed 28.08.2020.
  74. Torrance E.P. (1968) Education and The Creative Potential, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  75. Torrance E.P. (1974) Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Directions Manual and Scoring Guide (Verbal Test Booklet A), Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
  76. UK Government (2009) Multi-criteria analysis: A manual, Wetherby: Department for Communities and Local Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/191506/Mult-crisis_analysis_a_manual.pdf, accessed 18.08.2020.
  77. UK Government (2017) Futures Toolkit: Tools for strategic futures for policy-makers and analysts. London: Cabinet Office and Government Office for Science. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/futures-toolkit-for-policy-makers-and-analysts, accessed 18.08.2020.
  78. Uotila T., Melkas H., Harmaakorpi V. (2005) Incorporating futures research into regional knowledge creation and management. Futures, 37, 849-866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.001
  79. Velasco G. (2017) Understanding the generation of research and innovation policy advice with foresight processes (PhD Thesis), Manchester: The University of Manchester. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/57431200/FULL_TEXT.PDF, accessed 28.08.2020.
  80. Weisburg R.W. (1986) Creativity: Genius and Other Myths, New York: Freeman.
  81. Yaniv I. (2004) Receiving other people's advice: Influence and benefit. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002
  82. Yin R.K. (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.), London: SAGE.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».