Class Litigation in Sweden

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is dedicated to group action and group proceedings in Sweden. This country is rather unique in that it was among the first countries of continental law that introduced group action. As a result Sweden model of group litigation received traits of equally continental law and common law. The research begins with the history of enactment of law on group proceedings in Sweden, discusses the amendments to the law, circulating in Swedish society. Then the author touches the legal scope of current law on group proceedings and classification of group actions, provided in Swedish law. Also the author raises the following questions: special preconditions for group proceedings and Swedish approach to the formation of the group, characterized by choosing opt-in model, because it is very popular in Europe. In the article Swedish approach to fee agreements is analyzed, special attention is devoted to risk agreements as an example of successful achievement of Swedish law. The author concludes that this approach is useful to introduce into Russian law.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nikita A. Sutormin

Institute of Law and National Security, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: nsutormin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1071-5029

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor of the Civil Law and Procedure Department.

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Sutormin, N. A. Advantages and disadvantages of class actions. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2020;(7):119-123. (In Russ.)
  2. Karlsgodt, P. G., ed. World class actions. A guide to group and representative actions around the globe. Oxford University Press; 2012. 854 р.
  3. Sutormin, N. A. Collective actions in the European Union: history of development and modern regulation. HSE University Journal of International Law. 2024;2(2):59-71. (In Russ.)
  4. Ervo, L. The impact of the Directive on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers on the East-Nordic countries’ legislation. Revista Italo-Española de Derecho Procesal. 2020;(2):143-163.
  5. Wrbka, S., Uytsel, S. van, Siems, M., eds. Collective actions: enhancing access to justice and reconciling multilayer interests? Cambridge University Press; 2012. 423 р.
  6. Falla, E. The role of the court in collective redress litigation. Larcier; 2014. 324 p.
  7. Klonoff, R. H. Class actions and other multi-party litigation in a nutshell. 4th ed. West Academic Publishing; 2012. 544 p.
  8. Cashman, P. К. Class action law and practice. Federation Press; 2007. 737 р.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).