CEO`s education and investments in R&D

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper evaluates influence of CEO`s education and her experience on amounts invested in R&D in pharmaceutical industry. The sample consists of 270 pharmaceutical high-tech companies from S&P BMI index in 1999-2018 from 23 countries, both developed and emerging. The pharmaceutical industry is of particular interest since the projects there require specialized education to understand and manage the process. Therefore, the payback period of investments is long. As a result, in pharmaceuticals there is a high rate of intangible assets comparing to other sectors.

At the first glance, according to the results of regression analysis, business education, financial, managerial and economic education has no significant impact on investments. However, education in specific sphere, like physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, has a significant positive impact on R&D expenses. We can see the similar effect for the CEO`s with two or more degrees in different fields. These results are in line with the findings of previous studies regarding CEO`s education.

At the next stage, educational level of CEO and its field are analyzed simultaneously. A degree obtained in the industry-specific field or a degree supplemented by a financial or managerial education has a positive impact on R&D expenses, while standalone financial degree, by contrast, has a negative effect.

So, we contribute to the academic literature with the idea that to get the unbiased results in similar studies we should account for not only degree but also the field. In practical sphere, the results can be useful for those who choose the educational track on their career path to CEO position as well as for HRs, Boards of directors, and other stakeholders while making decision on CEO turnover. Moreover, the results provide insights that could be useful for market analyst`s and investors` predictive models.

About the authors

P. Khmeleva

HSE University, Moscow, Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: phmeleva@hse.ru

References

  1. Bantel K.A., Jackson S.E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal. 1989;10(S1):107-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709
  2. Orens R., Reheul A.-M. Do CEO demographics explain cash holdings in SMEs? European Management Journal. 2013;31(6):549-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.01.003
  3. Lee W.S., Moon J. Determinants of CEO strategic risk-taking in the airline industry. Tourism Management Perspectives. 2016;18:111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.01.009
  4. Jing L., Moon J. Airline chief executive officer and corporate social responsibility. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158599
  5. Ting I., Azizan N., Kweh Q. Upper echelon theory revisited: The relationship between CEO personal characteristics and financial leverage decision. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;195:686-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.276
  6. King T., Srivastav A., Williams J. What's in an education? Implications of CEO education for bank performance. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2016;37:287-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.01.003
  7. Mammassis C.S., Kostopoulos K.C. CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs. European Management Journal. 2019;37(5):577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.08.012
  8. Yang C., Xia X., Li Y., Zhao Y., Liu S. CEO financial career and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2021;74:81-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.01.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.01.018
  9. Boubaker S., Clark E., Mefteh-Wali S. Does the CEO elite education affect firm hedging policies? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2020;77:340-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.11.004
  10. Manyushis A.Yu. Business-education as a factor of the new management culture. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific Works оf the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2015;192(3):266-312. (In Russ.).
  11. Chua M., Ab Razak N.H., Nassir A.M., Yahya M.H. Dynamic capital structure in Indonesia: Does the education and experience of CEOs matter? Asia-Pacific Management Review. 2022;27(1):58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.003
  12. Lin Y.S. Fostering creativity through education: A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education. 2011;2(3):149-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23021
  13. Hatoum K., Moussu C., Gillet R. CEO overconfidence: Towards a new measure. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2022;84:102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102367
  14. Kaplan S. N., Sørensen M. Are CEOs different? The Journal of Finance. 2021;76(4):1773-1811. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13019
  15. Daboub A.J., Rasheed A.M.A., Priem R.L., Gray D.A. Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. The Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(1):138-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/258890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258890
  16. Bertrand M., Schoar A. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2003;118(4):1169-1208. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552775
  17. Bhagat S., Bolton B., Subramanian A. CEO education, CEO turnover, and firm performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1670219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1670219
  18. Zaidi N., Mohamed Ali A., Sadraoui T. CEO financial education and bank performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 2021;24(2):1-20.
  19. Custódio C., Metzger D. Financial expert CEOs: CEO’s work experience and firm’s financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics. 2014;114(1):125-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.06.002
  20. Alderman J., Forsyth J., Griffy-Brown C., Walton R.C. The benefits of hiring a STEM CEO: Decision making under innovation and real options. Technology in Society. 2022;71:102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102064
  21. Ting H.-I., Wang M.-C., Yang J.J., Tuan K.-W. Technical expert CEOs and corporate innovation. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2021;68:101603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101603
  22. Gounopoulos D., Loukopoulos G., Loukopoulos P. CEO education and the ability to raise capital. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2021;29(1):67-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12338
  23. Wang L., Tian Z., Wang X., Peng T.CEO academic experience and firm sustainable growth. Economic Research = Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2022. https://doi. org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2135553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2135553
  24. Yuan R., Wen W. Managerial foreign experience and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2018;48:752-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.015
  25. Cao F., Sun J., Yuan R. Board directors with foreign experience and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2019;46(9-10):1144-1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12400
  26. Gu J. Do at home as Romans do? CEO overseas experience and financial misconduct risk of emerging market firms. Research in International Business and Finance. 2022;60:101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101624
  27. Gill S., Kaur P. Family involvement in business and financial performance: A panel data analysis. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers. 2015;40(4):395-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090915605756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090915605756
  28. Kim J., Koo K. Are founder CEOs effective innovators? Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies. 2018;47(3):426-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12217
  29. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., De Massis A., Frattini F., Wright M. The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2015;32(3):310-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Khmeleva P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.