Impact of ESG Activities on the Innovation Development and Financial Performance of Firms

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the technology-driven economy, a firm’s sustainable financial performance is significantly influenced by its efficiency in research and development (R&D) and broader innovation initiatives. Conversely, while embracing ESG-related activities can potentially open up a broader spectrum of funding, it may also impose challenges on companies as they strive to meet the escalating demands for sus tainability practices and contend with increasing ESG-related risks. Hence, businesses are confronted with the imperative of making prudent ESG-related investments while simultaneously maintaining a strong track record in innovation performance. The findings of numerous studies suggest that investments in ESG projects can yield both positive and negative outcomes for innovation performance. However, recent trends within the ESG industry have amplified concerns regarding the trade-offs between ESG considerations, innovation endeavors, and overall financial performance.

About the authors

Y. Dranev

Author for correspondence.
Email: ydranev@hse.ru

References

  1. Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profitability. The New York Times Magazine. 1970 September 13. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html (accessed on 15.06.2023)
  2. Gillan S.L., Koch A., Starks L.T. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2021;66:101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
  3. Derwall J., Koedijk К., Ter Horst J.R. A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking and Finance. 2011;35(8):2137-2147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.009
  4. Margolis J.D., Elfenbein H.A., Walsh. J.P. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2009:1-68. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866371
  5. Salim N., Ab Rahman N.M, Abd Wahab D. A systematic literature review of internal capabilities for enhancing eco-innovation performance of manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;209:1445-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.105
  6. Ryszko A. Proactive environmental strategy, technological eco-innovation and firm performance—Case of Poland. Sustainability. 2016;8(2):156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020156
  7. Epstein M.J., Buhovac A.R., Yuthas K. Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning. 2015;48(1):35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.11.001
  8. Mithani M.A. Innovation and CSR—Do they go well together? Long Range Planning. 2017;50(6):699-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.002
  9. Bae K.H., El Ghoul S., Gong Z.J., et al. Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2021;67:101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876
  10. Halbritter G., Dorfleitner G. The wages of social responsibility—where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics. 2015;26:25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.004
  11. Revelli C. Socially responsible investing (SRI): From mainstream to margin? Research in International Business and Finance. 2017;39(Part B):711–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.003
  12. Borgers A., Derwall J., Koedijk K., et al. Do social factors influence investment behavior and performance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2015;60:112-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.001
  13. Fifka M. Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2013;22(1):1-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.729
  14. Fama E.F., French K.R. Disagreement, tastes, and asset prices. Journal of Financial Economics. 2007;83(3):667-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003
  15. Baker M., Bergstresser D., Serafeim G., et al. Financing the response to climate change: The pricing and ownership of US green bonds. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2018;25194. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25194
  16. Auer B.R., Schuhmacher F. Do socially (ir) responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance.2016;59:51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002
  17. Krüger P. Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics. 2015;115(2):304-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008
  18. Capelle-Blancard G., Petit A. Every Little Helps? ESG News and Stock Market Reaction. Journal of Business Ethics.2019;157:543-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3
  19. Cornell B., Damodaran A. Valuing ESG: Doing good or sounding good? The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing.2020;1(1):76-93. https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2020.1.1.076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2020.1.1.076
  20. Serafeim G., Yoon A. Stock price reactions to ESG news: The role of ESG ratings and disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies. 2022;28:1500-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3
  21. Serafeim G., Yoon A. Which corporate ESG news does the market react to? Financial Analysts Journal. 2022;78(1):59-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1973879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1973879
  22. Tsai K.H., Huang C.T., Chen Z.H. Understanding variation in the relationship between environmental management practices and firm performance across studies: A meta-analytic review. Business Strategy and the Environment.2020;29(2):547-565. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2386
  23. Friede G., Busch T., Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2015;5(4):210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  24. Lins K.V., Servaes H., Tamayo A. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance. 2017;72(4):1785-1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  25. Flammer C. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science. 2015;61(11):2549-2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038
  26. Flammer C. Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics. 2021;142(2):499-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
  27. Borghesi R., Houston J.F., Naranjo A. Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;26:164-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.008
  28. Cornett M.M., Erhemjamts O., Tehranian H. Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of US commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2016;70:137-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.024
  29. Ghanbarpour T., Gustafsson A. How do corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovativeness increase financial gains? A customer perspective analysis. Journal of Business Research. 2022;140:471-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.016
  30. Burke J.J. Do boards take environmental, social, and governance issues seriously? Evidence from Media Coverage and CEO Dismissals. Journal of Business Ethics.2022;176:647–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04715-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04715-x
  31. Hartzmark S.M., Sussman A.B. Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance. 2019;74(6):2789-2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841
  32. Chiang J. Growing the US Green Bond Market -Volume 1: The Barriers and Challenges. California Treasury; 2017. URL: https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/greenbonds/publications/reports/green_bond_market_01.pdf (accessed on 15.06.2023)
  33. Banga J. The green bond market: a potential source of climate finance for developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2019;9(1):17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2018.1498617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2018.1498617
  34. Partridge C., Medda F.R. The evolution of pricing performance of green municipal bonds. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2020;10(1):44-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2019.1661187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2019.1661187
  35. Darroch J. Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2005;9(3):101-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809
  36. Chaudhary S., Batra S. Absorptive capacity and small family firm performance: exploring the mediation processes. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2018;22(6):1201-1216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0047
  37. Galindo M.Á., Méndez M.T. Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research. 2014;67(5):825-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.052
  38. Pece A.M., Simona O.E.O., Salisteanu F. Innovation and economic growth: An empirical analysis for CEE countries. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;26:461-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00874-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00874-6
  39. Katz J.A., Aldrich H.E., Welbourne T.M., et al. Guest editor’s comments special issue on human resource management and the SME: Toward a new synthesis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2000;25(1):7–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870002500102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870002500102
  40. Audretsch D.B., Segarra A., Teruel M. Why don’t all young firms invest in R&D? Small Business Economics.2014;43:751-766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9561-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9561-9
  41. Pellegrino G., Piva M. Innovation, industry and firm age: are there new knowledge production functions? Eurasian Business Review. 2020;10:65-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-019-00129-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-019-00129-6
  42. Lee M.T., Raschke R.L., Krishen A.S. Understanding ESG scores and firm performance: Are high-performing firms E, S, and G-balanced? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023;195:122779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122779
  43. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F.L., Rynes S.L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies. 2003;24(3):403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
  44. Aguinis H., Glavas A. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management. 2012;38(4):932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
  45. Skordoulis M., Ntanos S., Kyriakopoulos G.L., et al. Environmental innovation, open innovation dynamics and competitive advantage of medium and large-sized firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2020;6(4):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040195
  46. Delmas M., Hoffmann V.H., Kuss M. Under the tip of the iceberg: Absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Business & Society. 2011;50(1):116-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394400
  47. Hart L.S. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(4):986-1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
  48. Munodawafa R.T., Johl S.K. A systematic review of eco-innovation and performance from the resource-based and stakeholder perspectives. Sustainability. 2019;11(21):6067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216067
  49. Zheng J., Khurram M.U., Chen L. Can green innovation affect ESG ratings and financial performance? evidence from Chinese GEM listed companies. Sustainability. 2022;14(14):8677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148677
  50. Ringel M., Schlomann B., Krail M., et al. Towards a green economy in Germany? The role of energy efficiency policies. Applied Energy. 2016;179:1293-1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.063
  51. Zhang D., Meng L., Zhang J. Environmental subsidy disruption, skill premiums and ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2023;90:102862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102862
  52. Zhou S., Rashid M.H.U., Mohd. Zobair S.A., et al. Does ESG impact firms’ sustainability performance? The mediating effect of innovation performance. Sustainability.2023;15(6):5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065586
  53. Fu L, Boehe D, Orlitzky M. Are R&D-Intensive firms also corporate social responsibility specialists? A multicountry study. Research Polic y. 2020;49(8):104082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104082
  54. Xu J., Liu F., Shang Y. R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China. Kybernetes. 2021;50(3):737-756. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0793
  55. Dicuonzo G., Donofrio F., Ranaldo S., et al. The effect of innovation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2022;30(4):1191-1209. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2020-1120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2020-1120
  56. Margolis J.D., Walsh J.P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2003;48(2):268-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/35566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659
  57. Huang Z., Liao G., Li Z. Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019;144:148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023
  58. Vinding A.L. Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2006;15(4-5):507-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500513057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500513057
  59. Gong Y., Zhou J., Chang S. Core knowledge employee creativity and firm performance: The moderating role of riskiness orientation, firm size, and realized absorptive capacity. Personnel psychology. 2013;66(2):443-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12024
  60. Schweisfurth T.G., Raasch C. Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: Antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness. Research Polic y. 2018;47(4):687-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.017
  61. Akhavan P., Hosseini M. Social capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: an empirical study of R&D teams in Iran. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.2016;28(1):96-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1072622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1072622
  62. Kim S., Li Z. Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073746
  63. Miroshnychenko I., De Massis A. Three decades of research on corporate governance and R&D investments: a systematic review and research agenda. R&D Management. 2020;50(5):648-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12432
  64. Ivashkovskaya I., Evdokimov S. Does the Corporate Financial Architecture of Innovative Companies Differ? The Evidence From the USA. Korporativnye Finansy = Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2018;12(4):7-28. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.12.4.2018.7-28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.12.4.2018.7-28
  65. David P., Hitt M.A., Gimeno J. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. The Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44(1):144-157. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069342
  66. Hvidkjær S. ESG investing: a literature review. 2017. URL: https://dansif.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Litterature-review-UK-Sep-2017.pdf (accessed on 29.07.2023)
  67. Khan M. Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world. Financial Analysts Journal.2019;75(4):103-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
  68. Mohammad W.M.W., Wasiuzzaman S. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems. 2021;2:100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015
  69. Park S.R., Jang J.Y. The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2021;9(3):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030048
  70. Ge G., Xiao X., Li Z., et al. Does ESG performance promote high-quality development of enterprises in China? The mediating role of innovation inpu. Sustainability.2022;14(7):3843. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073843
  71. Christensen H.B., Hail L., Leuz C. Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies. 2021;26(3):1176-1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  72. Hockerts K., Moir L. Communicating corporate responsibility to investors: The changing role of the investor relations function. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004;52:85-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033109.35980.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033109.35980.16
  73. Gyönyörová L., Stachoň M., Stašek D. ESG ratings: relevant information or misleading clue? Evidence from the S&P Global 1200. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment.2023;13(2):1075-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062
  74. Chatterji A.K., Levine D.I., Toffel M.W. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.2009;18(1):125-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.x
  75. Avramov D., Cheng S., Lioui A., et al. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics.2022;145(2 Part B):642-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
  76. Berg F., Koelbel J.F., Rigobon R. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance.2022;26(6):1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
  77. Drempetic S., Klein C., Zwergel B. The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics. 2020;167:333-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
  78. Crespi F., Migliavacca M. The determinants of ESG rating in the financial industry: The same old story or a different tale? Sustainability. 2020;12(16):6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166398
  79. Capelle-Blancard G., Petit A. The weighting of CSR dimensions: One size does not fit all. Business & Society. 2017;56(6):919-943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315620118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315620118
  80. Dupuy P., Garibal J.C. Cross-dispersion bias-adjusted ESG rankings. Journal of Asset Management. 2022;23(7):631-643. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-022-00293-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-022-00293-x
  81. Widyawati L. A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment.2020;29(2):619-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393
  82. Cerqueti R., Ciciretti R., Dalò A., et al. ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability.2021;54:100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100887
  83. Ferriani F., Natoli F. ESG risks in times of Covid-19. Applied Economics Letters. 2021;28(18): 1537-1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1830932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1830932
  84. Demers E., Hendrikse J., Joos P., et al. ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2021;48(3-4):433-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12523
  85. Sun L., Small G. Has sustainable investing made an impact in the period of COVID-19?: evidence from Australian exchange traded funds. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2022;12(1):251-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1977577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1977577
  86. Singh A. COVID‐19 and ESG preferences: Corporate bonds versus equities. International Review of Finance.2022;22(2):298–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12351
  87. Folger-Laronde Z., Pashang S., Feor L., et al. ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2022;12(2):490-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1782814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1782814
  88. Takahashi H., Yamada K. When the Japanese stock market meets COVID-19: Impact of ownership, China and US exposure, and ESG channels. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2021;74:101670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101670

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Dranev Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.